DONG SOO PARK

Prof. Dr. DONG SOO PARK

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 August 2011 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HJHwang Gyun Jeon
Hwang Gyun Jeon
IGIn Hyuck Gong
In Hyuck Gong
JHJin Ho Hwang
Jin Ho Hwang
DCDon Kyung Choi
Don Kyung Choi
SLSeung-ryeol Lee
Seung-ryeol Lee
DPDONG SOO PARK
DONG SOO PARK
Study Type – Prognosis (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? At present, many studies have been executed to identify predictors for chronic kidney disease or renal insufficiency after radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. We examined whether preoperative kidney volume is a predictor for renal function after radical or partial nephrectomies in RCC patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the relationship between preoperative kidney volume and changes in renal function in RCC patients who underwent radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy performed by one surgeon. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether preoperative kidney volume is a prognostic factor for predicting the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 133 patients who underwent radical ( n = 83) or partial ( n = 50) nephrectomy for RCC. Kidney parenchymal volume was measured using personal computer‐based software and GFR was estimated before and after surgery at 6 and 12 months. We evaluated the change in kidney volume after radical and partial nephrectomy and used regression analysis to identify predictors of lower post‐surgical GFR at 12 months. RESULTS: The mean volume of the normal side kidney for the radical nephrectomy group increased from 142.4 mL to 166.0 mL (17.2%) and 171.5 mL (21.2%) after surgery at 6 and 12 months, respectively. In the partial nephrectomy group, the volume of the normal side kidney increased from 127.2 mL to 138.8 mL (9.1%) and 140.6 mL (10.9%) after surgery at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The volume of the operated side kidney decreased from 128.5 mL to 102.3 mL (20.1%) and 101.8 (20.6%) after surgery at 6 and 12 months, respectively. In the radical nephrectomy group, older age ( P < 0.001), preoperative volume of the normal kidney ( P = 0.022) and preoperative GFR for the normal side kidney ( P = 0.045) were significant predictors of lower post‐surgical GFR at 12 months. In the partial nephrectomy group, older age ( P = 0.001) and preoperative volume for both kidneys ( P = 0.037) were significant predictors of lower post‐surgical GFR at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Preoperative kidney volume is an independent predictor of GFR in RCC patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy.

1 January 2006 in Yonsei Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDONG SOO PARK
DONG SOO PARK
TCTaek Woo Cho
Taek Woo Cho
YLYong Kyu Lee
Yong Kyu Lee
YLYoung Tae Lee
Young Tae Lee
YHYoung Kwon Hong
Young Kwon Hong
WJWoong Ki Jang
Woong Ki Jang
Park DS, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2006 Oct;47(5):706-714. http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.5.706

1 January 2016 in Chonnam Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCChang Il Choi
Chang Il Choi
YYYoung Dong Yu
Young Dong Yu
DPDONG SOO PARK
DONG SOO PARK
Choi CI, et al. Chonnam Med J. 2016 May;52(2):123-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2016.52.2.123

23 April 2009 in Advances in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDONG SOO PARK
DONG SOO PARK
JOJong Jin Oh
Jong Jin Oh
JLJin Ha Lee
Jin Ha Lee
WJWoong Ki Jang
Woong Ki Jang
YHYoung Kwon Hong
Young Kwon Hong
SHSung Keun Hong
Sung Keun Hong
Purpose. To determine the effect of simple use of suppository povidone-iodine on infectious complications after transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate.Methods. All 481 patients are included and received antibiotic prophylaxis. Among them, 360 patients received povidone-iodine suppository (Gynobetadine; 200 mg) immediately prior to biopsy and 121 patients did not. Infectious complications were classified. To evaluate bactericidal effects, we counted bacterial colonies in the rectum, harvested from a rectal swab before insertion of the suppository and after biopsy. Aliquots of the suspended bacterial strains were added to Mueller-Hinton agar medium for incubation. Colony counts were determined.Results. Infectious complications developed in 1 case (0.3%) in the rectal preparation group (Group 1) and in 8 cases (6.6%) in the nonrectal preparation group (Group 2). One in Group 1 had a fever without sepsis. Two patients had sepsis and six had fever without sepsis in Group 2. Rectal preparation was a statistically significant risk factor influencing the development of infectious complications. In vitro experiments, the mean number of colony-forming units decreased 99.9% after the rectal povidone-iodine preparation.Conclusions. All through the biopsy, povidone-iodine melted into the rectum and decreased the bacterial colony count. Simple use of povidone-iodine suppository before prostate biopsy minimizes the risk of infectious complications.

1 April 2002 in Journal of Endourology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDONG SOO PARK
DONG SOO PARK
JPJong Ho Park
Jong Ho Park
YLYoung Tae Lee
Young Tae Lee
We present five cases of bilateral extrinsic ureteral obstruction in advanced nongenitourinary abdominal malignancy. They show the superiority of percutaneous nephrostomy to indwelling ureteral stents in providing diversion. We suggest that percutaneous nephrostomy drainage should be the management of choice in extrinsic obstruction by advanced abdominal malignancies.

1 January 2020 in The World Journal of Men's Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YYYoung Eun Yoon
Young Eun Yoon
TKTae Yoon Kim
Tae Yoon Kim
TSTai Eun Shin
Tai Eun Shin
ELEunji Lee
Eunji Lee
KCKyung Hwa Choi
Kyung Hwa Choi
DKDae Keun Kim
Dae Keun Kim
Yoon YE, et al. World J Mens Health. 2019 Jan;37:e3. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.180095