Cholera increases the risk of harmful effects on foetuses. We prospectively followed pregnant women unaware of their pregnancy status who received a study agent in a clinical trial evaluating the association between exposure to an oral cholera vaccine (OCV) and foetal survival. Study participants were selected from a randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The vaccination campaign was conducted between January 10 and February 4, 2014. We enrolled women who were exposed to an OCV or placebo during pregnancy (Cohort 1) and women who were pregnant after the vaccination was completed (Cohort 2). Our primary endpoint was pregnancy loss (spontaneous miscarriage or stillbirth), and the secondary endpoints were preterm delivery and low birth weight. We employed a log-binomial regression to calculate the relative risk of having adverse outcomes among OCV recipients compared to that among placebo recipients. There were 231 OCV and 234 placebo recipients in Cohort 1 and 277 OCV and 299 placebo recipients in Cohort 2. In Cohort 1, the incidence of pregnancy loss was 113/1000 and 115/1000 among OCV and placebo recipients, respectively. The adjusted relative risk for pregnancy loss was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.58–1.61; p = 0.91) in Cohort 1. We did not observe any variation in the risk of pregnancy loss between the two cohorts. The risks for preterm delivery and low birth weight were not significantly different between the groups in both cohorts. Our study provides additional evidence that exposure to an OCV during pregnancy does not increase the risk of pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, or low birth weight, suggesting that pregnant women in cholera-affected regions should not be excluded in a mass vaccination campaign. The study is registered at ( http://clinicaltrials.gov ). Identifier: NCT02027207 .

Background: The dynamics of humoral immune responses following primary and booster COVID-19 vaccinations are crucial to understand in order to optimize vaccination strategies. This study evaluates the magnitude and durability of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibody responses across different vaccines in a large cohort of Bangladeshi adults. Methods: A total of 6300 adults from nine hospitals across eight divisions of Bangladesh were enrolled. Participants received two primary doses of either ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Covishield, Serum Institute of India, n = 2855), mRNA-1273 (Moderna, n = 578), BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech, n = 121), or Vero-cell-inactivated (Sinopharm, n = 2746) vaccines. Booster doses were administered at one-year intervals post-primary vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG antibody responses were measured by ELISA using serum from vaccinees at multiple time points after two primary and two booster doses. Results: A total of 3745 individuals received booster 1 (third dose), with 59% receiving heterologous boosters (a different vaccine regimen than the primary doses). Only 5.5% (n = 347) of participants received a second booster one year after the first booster (among them, 99% received BNT162b2). Our results suggest that heterologous boosters with the mRNA vaccine induced higher IgG levels than homologous boosters for individuals who received primary vaccination with adenovirus vector-based ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or a Vero-cell-inactivated vaccine. However, in those who initially received the mRNA-based vaccine, both homologous and heterologous boosters produced comparable IgG responses. Among all vaccine types, booster immunization with the Vero-cell-inactivated vaccine induced the lowest antibody responses. Longitudinal analysis demonstrated significantly high IgG levels over the 12 months following the first booster (p < 0.0001); however, IgG levels declined significantly after the second booster dose (fourth dose). Conclusions: Heterologous boosting strategies, particularly those involving mRNA vaccines, elicit stronger and more sustained IgG responses compared to a homologous booster. However, antibody waning after the second booster highlights the need for continued monitoring and potential additional vaccine strategies.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a rapidly growing public health crisis in Bangladesh, where an estimated 13.1 million adults were living with the condition in 2021, with projections suggesting this figure will nearly 22.3 million by 2045. Poor medication adherence and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are recognized consequences of long-term T2DM management, yet data from northwestern Bangladesh remain scarce. This study aimed to assess treatment adherence, HRQoL and identify their associated factors among T2DM patients in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study between January and December 2021 among 205 T2DM patients from two tertiary-level hospitals in Rajshahi. Treatment adherence was assessed using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), and HRQoL was measured using the EuroQol‐5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Results The mean age of participants was 54.43 (±10.75) years; 50.73% were female. The majority (85.85%) had HbA1c ≥6.5%, reflecting widespread poor glycaemic control. Regarding treatment adherence, 40.98% of patients had low adherence, 26.83% had medium adherence, and 32.19% had high adherence. In terms of HRQoL, only 6.83% were in perfect health state, while 52.68% had slight/moderate problems and 40.49% had severe/extreme problems across EQ-5D-5L domains. The association between treatment adherence and HRQoL was not statistically significant (p=0.265). Multiple regression analysis (Adjusted R²=0.620) identified diabetic complications, illiteracy, primary education, female gender, higher BMI, joint family type, treatment adherence, older age, and two antidiabetic medications as significant predictors of poorer HRQoL, while urban residence and family history of DM were independently associated with better HRQoL. Conclusions A substantial proportion of T2DM patients exhibited low treatment adherence and markedly impaired HRQoL. While adherence and HRQoL were not directly associated, diabetic complications emerged as the strongest independent predictor of poor quality of life. These findings highlight the urgent need for multidisciplinary interventions to prevent complications in this population.

Background and Objectives: The morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19 have burdened worldwide healthcare systems beyond their capacities, forcing them to promptly investigate the virus characteristics and its associated outcomes. This clinical analysis aimed to explore the key factors related to the fatal outcome of severe COVID-19 cases. Materials and Methods: Thirty-five adult severe COVID-19 patients were enrolled from two COVID-19 hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Clinical manifestation, comorbid conditions, medications, SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR related cycle threshold (CT) value, hematology, biochemical parameters with SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM responses at enrollment were compared between the survivors and deceased participants. Results: Total 27 patients survived and 8 patients died within 3 months of disease onset. Deceased patients suffered longer from shortness of breath than the survived (p = 0.049). Among the severe cases, 62% of the deceased patients had multiple comorbid condition compared to 48% of those who survived. Interestingly, the anti-viral was initiated earlier among the deceased patients [median day of 1 (IQR: 0, 1.5) versus 6.5 (IQR: 6.25, 6.75)]. Most of the survivors (55%) received a combination of anticoagulant (p = 0.034). Liver enzymes, creatinine kinase, and procalcitonin were higher among the deceased patients during enrollment. The median CT value among the deceased was significantly lower than the survivors (p = 0.025). A significant difference for initial IgG (p = 0.013) and IgM (p = 0.030) responses was found between the survivor and the deceased groups. Conclusions: The factors including older age, male gender, early onset of respiratory distress, multiple comorbidities, low CT value, and poor antibody response may contribute to the fatal outcome in severe COVID-19 patients. Early initiation of anti-viral and a combination of anticoagulant treatment may prevent or lower the fatality among severe COVID-19 cases.