Objective. To retrospectively analyse the features of calcinosis in a cohort of SSc patients. Methods. Charts of SSc patients attending the Ulcer Unit of the Rheumatology Department, University of Florence and presenting a clinical suspicion of calcinosis were considered in the study. Data on clinical history, including recent skin changes, and clinical examination of all areas with suspected calcinosis, radiological imaging of the calcinotic area, demographics and SSc-related organ involvement and pain measured by a visual analogue scale were recorded. Results. In 52 of 112 SSc patients, a total of 316 calcinoses were recorded and were divided into visible and palpable {154 [47.4%], clustered according to their macroscopic features as mousse [49 (31.8%)] and stone [ 105 (68.2%)]} and non-visible but palpable { 162 [52.6%]: net [5 (3%)], plate [22 (13.8%)] and stone [135 (83.2%)]}. The X-ray-based classification of all calcinoses, both visible and non-visible, was as follows: stone, 289 (91.4%); net, 12 (3.8%) and plate, 15 (4.8%). Skin ulcers complicated 154 of 316 calcinoses (48.7%). Mousse calcinosis was associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension, the stone subset was suggestive of pulmonary involvement and justified further investigation and the net subset was the slowest to heal. Conclusion. Our data indicate that calcinosis may be classified in SSc as mousse, stone, net and plate according to its clinical and X-ray features. This classification awaits validation for a possible use in clinical practice and to support early treatment and prevention of complications.

The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem of microorganisms residing in the human gastrointestinal tract, playing a crucial role in various biological processes and overall health maintenance. Dysbiosis, an imbalance in the composition and function of the gut microbiota, is linked to systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD). Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), especially butyrate, produced by the gut microbiota through the fermentation of dietary fibers, play a significant role in immunomodulation and maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Butyrate is essential for colonocyte energy, anti-inflammatory responses, and maintaining intestinal barrier integrity. Studies show reduced butyrate-producing bacteria in SAD patients, suggesting that increasing butyrate levels could have therapeutic benefits. Butyrate’s anti-inflammatory effects and its potential therapeutic role have been studied in rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren’s syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and Behçet’s disease. Despite promising in vitro and animal model results, human studies are limited, and the optimal strategies for modulating dysbiosis in SADs remain elusive. This review explores the current evidence on the immunoregulatory role of butyrate and its potential therapeutic effects in SAD.

Background: Filgotinib (FIL) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor with an affinity 30-fold higher than JAK2, approved to treat moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in adults with inadequate response or intolerance to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of FIL 200 mg daily therapy, after 3 and 6 months, in 120 patients affected by RA, managed in Tuscany and Umbria rheumatological centers. The following clinical records were analyzed: demographical data, smoking status, previous presence of comorbidities (Herpes zoster -HZ- infection, venous thromboembolism -VTE-, major adverse cardiovascular events -MACE-, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension), disease duration, presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), rheumatoid factor (RF), number of biological failures, and prior csDMARDs utilized. At baseline, and after 3 (T3) and 6 (T6) months of FIL therapy, we evaluated mean steroid dosage, csDMARDs intake, clinimetric indexes (DAS28, CDAI, HAQ, patient and doctor PGA, VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and body mass index (BMI). Results: At baseline, the mean disease duration was 9.4 ± 7.5 years; the prevalence of previous HZ infection, VTE, MACE, and cancer was respectively 4.12%, 0%, 7.21%, and 0.83%, respectively. In total, 76.3% of patients failed one or more biologics (one biological failure, 20.6%; two biological failures, 27.8%; three biological failures, 16.5%; four biological failures, 10.3%; five biological failures, 1.1%). After 3 months of FIL therapy, all clinimetric index results significantly improved from baseline, as well as after 6 months. Also, ESR and CRP significatively decreased at T3 and T6. Two cases of HZ were recorded, while no new MACE, VTE, or cancer were recorded during the observation time. Conclusion: Despite the limitations of the retrospective study and of the observational period of only 6 months, real-life data on the treatment of RA patients with FIL demonstrate that this Jak inhibitor therapy is safe in terms of CV, VTE events, and occurrence of cancer, and is also effective in a population identified as “difficult to treat” due to failure of previous b-DMARD therapy.

Introduction: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is well-known for its pro-inflammatory properties, has been proven to target a wide range of cells in the joint, and has been implicated in extra-articular and articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tocilizumab (TCZ) is now widely used in patients with active RA and a number of additional agents that target the IL-6 pathways are under development, including sirukumab (SRK). Areas covered: SRK is an IgG1κ human anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody which binds to IL-6 and prevents IL-6-mediated downstream effects. Initial trial results in phase-III studies in patients with RA seemed promising, showing improved results in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. Data derive from the phase-II study and the various SIRROUND studies (phase III). Expert commentary: The available data show that SRK50 mg every 4 weeks or 100 mg every 2 weeks will be effective in treating the RA population, with clinical improvements as early as week 2 and sustained over time. The adverse-event profile seems to be similar to TCZ, except for an increased mortality post open-label studies due to infections and cardiovascular events, our knowledge of which will be deepened with post-marketing surveillance and registry data.