Background. Since circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers clear advantages as a minimally invasive method for tumor monitoring compared with tumor tissue, we aimed to evaluate genotyping ctDNA using a next-generation sequencing- (NGS-) based panel to identify the prognostic value of mutation status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with primary tumor resected and with subsequent lines of treatment in this study. Methods. 76 mCRC patients treated in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from 2011 to 2017 were enrolled. Genotyping of RAS/BRAF in tumor tissue and ctDNA was determined by ARMS PCR and with a 40-gene panel using NGS, respectively. Patient clinicopathologic features and RAS/BRAF gene mutation status were evaluated by survival analysis for disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results. Among 76 patients, KRAS distributions were not significantly correlated with any clinicopathologic features. The concordance between tumor tissue and ctDNA KRAS mutation was 81.25%. Mutations of RAS/BRAF had no significant impact on DFS after surgery (hazard ratio (HR), 1.205; 95% CI, 0.618 to 2.349; P=0.5837) but prognosticated poorer PFS in subsequent first-line therapy (HR, 3.351; 95% CI, 1.172 to 9.576; P=0.024). Conclusion. ctDNA was comparable with tumor tissue for mutation detection. RAS/BRAF mutations detected in ctDNA predict a worse PFS in mCRC patients with first-line chemotherapy. Our results provide support for the prognostic value of RAS/BRAF ctDNA mutation detection in mCRC patients.

Background: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detection for non-invasive diagnosis requires higher sensitivity and accuracy due to the low circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) content. Many methods have been developed to improve detection of ctDNA, including ultra-deep sequencing or enrichment of shorter cfDNA fragments, such as those in the range of 90–150 bp. Methods: Here, we developed a method for single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) library preparation with a large proportion of magnetic beads to enrich the shorter cfDNA fragments. We aimed to determine if this could increase the ctDNA content and thus improve the sensitivity of ctDNA detection by testing the method in blood samples from patients with advanced cancers (non-small cell lung cancers, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal cancer and liver cancer). Results: This method was able to obtain shorter cfDNA both in commercial cfDNA references and real world clinical cfDNA samples. Plasmid simulation experiments showed that using a large proportion of magnetic beads to construct the library could obtain more ctDNA derived from shorter-fragment plasmids, which could significantly improve the detection of ctDNA especially in the low-variant allele frequency sample. In real-world clinical samples, this method may be able to increase the opportunity to obtain alteration reads from short fragments, which was important to low frequency detection. Conclusions: The ssDNA library preparation with large proportion of magnetic beads could increase the opportunity to obtain alteration reads from short fragments, which is crucial for low variant allele frequency detection.