James Antonini

Dr. James Antonini

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2003 in Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJames Antonini
James Antonini
Many of the epidemiology studies performed are difficult to compare because of differences in worker populations, industrial settings, welding techniques, duration of exposure, and other occupational exposures besides welding fumes. Some studies were conducted in carefully controlled work environments, others during actual workplace conditions, and some in laboratories. Epidemiology studies have shown that a large number of welders experience some type of respiratory illness. Respiratory effects seen in full-time welders have included bronchitis, airway irritation, lung function changes, and a possible increase in the incidence of lung cancer. Pulmonary infections are increased in terms of severity, duration, and frequency among welders. Although epidemiological studies have demonstrated an increase in pulmonary illness after exposure to welding fumes, little information of the causality, dose-response, and possible underlying mechanisms regarding the inhalation of welding fumes exists. Even less information is available about the neurological, reproductive, and dermal effects after welding fume exposure. Moreover, carcinogenicity and short-term and long-term toxicology studies of welding fumes in animals are lacking or incomplete. Therefore, an understanding of possible adverse health effects of exposure to welding fumes is essential to risk assessment and the development of prevention strategies and will impact a large population of workers.

13 March 2003 in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJames Antonini
James Antonini
ALAnthony B. Lewis
Anthony B. Lewis
JRJenny R. Roberts
Jenny R. Roberts
DWDavid A. Whaley
David A. Whaley

1 February 2004 in Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJames Antonini
James Antonini
MTMichael D. Taylor
Michael D. Taylor
AZAnthony T. Zimmer
Anthony T. Zimmer
JRJenny R. Roberts
Jenny R. Roberts
It is estimated that more than 1 million workers worldwide perform some type of welding as part of their work duties. Epidemiology studies have shown that a large number of welders experience some type of respiratory illness. Respiratory effects seen in full-time welders have included bronchitis, siderosis, asthma, and a possible increase in the incidence of lung cancer. Pulmonary infections are increased in terms of severity, duration, and frequency among welders. Inhalation exposure to welding fumes may vary due to differences in the materials used and methods employed. The chemical properties of welding fumes can be quite complex. Most welding materials are alloy mixtures of metals characterized by different steels that may contain iron, manganese, chromium, and nickel. Animal studies have indicated that the presence and combination of different metal constituents is an important determinant in the potential pneumotoxic responses associated with welding fumes. Animal models have demonstrated that stainless steel (SS) welding fumes, which contain significant levels of nickel and chromium, induce more lung injury and inflammation, and are retained in the lungs longer than mild steel (MS) welding fumes, which contain mostly iron. In addition, SS fumes generated from welding processes using fluxes to protect the resulting weld contain elevated levels of soluble metals, which may affect respiratory health. Recent animal studies have indicated that the lung injury and inflammation induced by SS welding fumes that contain water-soluble metals are dependent on both the soluble and insoluble fractions of the fume. This article reviews the role that metals play in the pulmonary effects associated with welding fume exposure in workers and laboratory animals.

1 January 2013 in Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAaron Erdely
Aaron Erdely
MDMatthew M. Dahm
Matthew M. Dahm
BCBean T Chen
Bean T Chen
PZPatti C Zeidler-Erdely
Patti C Zeidler-Erdely
JFJoseph E Fernback
Joseph E Fernback
MSMary K Schubauer-Berigan
Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Dosimetry for toxicology studies involving carbon nanotubes (CNT) is challenging because of a lack of detailed occupational exposure assessments. Therefore, exposure assessment findings, measuring the mass concentration of elemental carbon from personal breathing zone (PBZ) samples, from 8 U.S.-based multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) manufacturers and users were extrapolated to results of an inhalation study in mice.

1 May 2006 in NeuroToxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJames Antonini
James Antonini
ASAnnette B. Santamaria
Annette B. Santamaria
NJNeil T. Jenkins
Neil T. Jenkins
EAElisa Albini
Elisa Albini
Roberto G LucchiniRoberto G Lucchini
Roberto G Lucchini

1 January 2013 in Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJenny R Roberts
Jenny R Roberts
JAJames Antonini
James Antonini
DPDale W Porter
Dale W Porter
RCRebecca S Chapman
Rebecca S Chapman
JSJames F Scabilloni
James F Scabilloni
RMRobert R Mercer
Robert R Mercer
The potential use of quantum dots (QD) in biomedical applications, as well as in other systems that take advantage of their unique physiochemical properties, has led to concern regarding their toxicity, potential systemic distribution, and biopersistence. In addition, little is known about workplace exposure to QD in research, manufacturing, or medical settings. The goal of the present study was to assess pulmonary toxicity, clearance, and biodistribution of QD with different functional groups in rats after pulmonary exposure.