Polat Polat

Dr. Polat Polat


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2018 in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FTFusun Taskin
Fusun Taskin
PPPolat Polat
Polat Polat
IEIbrahim halil Erdogdu
Ibrahim halil Erdogdu
FTfigen tunalı turkdogan
figen tunalı turkdogan
VÖVeli Süha Öztürk
Veli Süha Öztürk
SOSerdar Ozbas
Serdar Ozbas
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

20 May 2018 in The Breast Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPolat Polat
Polat Polat
FTFüsun Taşkın
Füsun Taşkın
MÇMehmet Burak Çildağ
Mehmet Burak Çildağ
ATAhmet Tanyeri
Ahmet Tanyeri
ASAykut Soyder
Aykut Soyder
FEFiliz Ergin
Filiz Ergin

13 November 2018 in Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CKCan Zafer Karaman
Can Zafer Karaman
SBSema Başak
Sema Başak
PPPolat Polat
Polat Polat
AÜAlparslan Ünsal
Alparslan Ünsal
FTFüsun Taşkın
Füsun Taşkın
CGCeren Günel
Ceren Günel

1 January 2019 in Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PPPolat Polat
Polat Polat
VÖVeli Süha Öztürk
Veli Süha Öztürk
NENimet Ersoz
Nimet Ersoz
AAAhmet Anık
Ahmet Anık
CKCanZafer Karaman
CanZafer Karaman
J Indian Prosthodont Soc, Official publication of Indian Prosthodontic Society

7 September 2021 in Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPolat Polat
Polat Polat
TKTolga Kocatürk
Tolga Kocatürk
ÖAÖzge K. Abdullayev
Özge K. Abdullayev
OAOğuz Abdullayev
Oğuz Abdullayev
MBMehmet Bilgen
Mehmet Bilgen

1 December 2016 in Journal of Glaucoma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BUBurcin Uz
Burcin Uz
PPPolat Polat
Polat Polat
TKTolga Kocatürk
Tolga Kocatürk
YDYelda O. Dayanir
Yelda O. Dayanir
VDVolkan Dayanir
Volkan Dayanir
MBMehmet Bilgen
Mehmet Bilgen
Objective of the Study: The objective of the study was to investigate the change in carotid arterial flow in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (XFG) for determining its diagnostic value. Materials and Methods: Patients with XFG (N=30) and control subjects (N=22) were recruited. Common carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid artery of each participant were examined using color Doppler and B-mode ultrasonography. Resistivity index (RI), as a flow parameter of interest, was measured and statistically compared between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic was also produced to assess its diagnostic value. Results: The measured RI values from the controls were within the expected range. Among CCA and internal carotid artery, only RI of CCA exhibited statistically significant changes in XFG (0.75±0.04 vs. 0.70±0.03 cm/s). Threshold value of RI=0.72 yielded 90% sensitivity and 73% specificity in distinguishing the cases of XFG from the controls. Conclusions: Flow dynamics of carotid arterial system exhibits different characteristics in individuals with XFG than controls. Such differences may serve as a basis for developing potentially new diagnostic biomarkers of XFG. Further studies are justified for examining the carotid flow in pseudoexfoliation syndrome and compare it against XFG for determining its power in differential diagnosis.