The role of ABO blood group system mismatch on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) outcomes is controversial since current publications of large datasets are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed 30,487 patients transplanted between 2010 and 2021 using the EBMT registry to assess ABO incompatibility’s effect on non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (RI), acute GvHD (aGvHD), chronic GvHD (cGvHD), and neutrophil engraftment. Transplantations were classified as ABO-compatible (56.3%), major (18.1%), minor (20.1%), and bidirectional (5.5%) incompatibilities. Mainly peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were used as the cell source in 85.6% of cases. Multivariate analysis found no significant association between compatibility status, with the compatible group serving as the reference, and NRM, OS, PFS, RI or cGvHD. The incidence of non-engraftment was significantly higher in the major (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07, p = 0.021) and bidirectional (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.15, p = 0.003) incompatibilities. At the same time, the risk of severe aGvHD grades III-IV was lower in the major incompatibility group (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77–0.94, p = 0.001). Our large contemporary study, showing no major impact on outcomes, suggests that the ABO blood group system should not be a primary consideration in donor selection for PBSC-based allo-HCT.

Glioblastoma, a highly aggressive and lethal brain cancer, lacks effective treatment options and has a poor prognosis. In our study, we explored the potential anti-cancer effects of sodium butyrate (SB) and celastrol (CEL) in two glioblastoma cell lines. SB, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, and CEL, derived from the tripterygium wilfordii plant, act as mTOR and proteasome inhibitors. Both can cross the blood–brain barrier, and they exhibit chemo- and radiosensitive properties in various cancer models. GB cell lines LN-405 and T98G were treated with SB and CEL. Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay and IC50 values were obtained. Gene expression of DNA repair, apoptosis, and autophagy-related genes was analyzed by RT-PCR. Cell cycle distribution was determined using flow cytometry. Viability assays using MTT assay revealed IC50 values of 26 mM and 22.7 mM for SB and 6.77 μM, and 9.11 μM for CEL in LN-405 and T98G cells, respectively. Furthermore, we examined the expression levels of DNA repair genes (MGMT, MLH-1, MSH-2, MSH-6), apoptosis genes (caspase-3, caspase-8, caspase-9), and an autophagy gene (ATG-6) using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, flow cytometry analysis revealed alterations in cell cycle distribution following treatment with SB, CEL and their combination. These findings indicate that SB and CEL may act through multiple mechanisms, including DNA repair inhibition, apoptosis induction, and autophagy modulation, to exert their anti-cancer effects in glioblastoma cells. This is the first study providing novel insights into the potential therapeutic effects of SB and CEL in glioblastoma.