Ertuğrul Ak

Dr. Ertuğrul Ak

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 November 2026 in BMC Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMehmet Ali Avcı
Mehmet Ali Avcı
BCBaşar Cander
Başar Cander
SFSalih Fettahoğlu
Salih Fettahoğlu
SFSüreyya Tuba Fettahoğlu
Süreyya Tuba Fettahoğlu
EAErtuğrul Ak
Ertuğrul Ak
UKUtku Murat Kalafat
Utku Murat Kalafat
To evaluate the association of the hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet (HALP) score with one-year all-cause mortality and its discriminatory performance

4 November 2026 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFSalih Fettahoğlu
Salih Fettahoğlu
EAErtuğrul Ak
Ertuğrul Ak
SFSüreyya Tuba Fettahoğlu
Süreyya Tuba Fettahoğlu
AAAdem Az
Adem Az
Background/Objectives: Multimodal artificial intelligence may support point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) interpretation in emergency medicine, but its performance on static images and sensitivity to acquisition context remain uncertain. This study evaluated GPT-5.6 Sol and assessed whether probe-region information improves interpretation across view/plane, anatomy, and pathology domains. Methods: In this paired comparative in silico study, 92 educational ultrasound images from seven anatomical regions were assessed under standardized uninformed (image only) and informed (image plus probe-region code) prompting conditions. Two independent raters scored responses against textbook-based references in three domains: view/plane identification, anatomical structure identification, and pathological finding detection. Each domain was scored from 0 to 2. Disagreements were resolved by a third ultrasound expert, and fully correct responses were defined as domain scores of 2. The primary outcome was the total performance score (0–6). Secondary outcomes included domain-specific scores, fully correct response rates, and exploratory subgroup analyses. Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar tests assessed paired scores and fully correct rates, respectively. Results: Total performance was higher with informed prompting (median (interquartile range), 5 (4–6) versus 4 (2–5); p < 0.001). Interrater agreement was substantial to almost perfect across evaluation domains (quadratic-weighted κ = 0.750–1.000). Fully correct rates increased from 58.7% to 88.0% for view/plane identification and from 47.8% to 82.6% for anatomical structure identification (both p < 0.001). Pathological finding detection improved from 35.9% to 48.9% (p = 0.002). Among pathology-positive images, missed or incorrectly labeled pathology remained frequent (44.8%) despite informed prompting. Regional differences in total performance were significant only under uninformed prompting (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Probe-region information substantially improved view/plane and anatomical structure identification, but pathological finding detection remained comparatively weak. In static POCUS interpretation, improved anatomical recognition did not translate into reliable pathology detection. Persistent false-negative and false-positive errors do not support independent diagnostic use. Potential applications in POCUS education and anatomical labeling require further validation.