Mohamed A. Imam

Dr. Mohamed A. Imam


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 August 2017 in International Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MIMohamed A. Imam
Mohamed A. Imam
JHJames Holton
James Holton
LELukas Ernstbrunner
Lukas Ernstbrunner
WPWojciech Pepke
Wojciech Pepke
FGFlorian Grubhofer
Florian Grubhofer
MSMartyn Snow
Martyn Snow

17 July 2019 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDominik C. Meyer
Dominik C. Meyer
LELukas Ernstbrunner
Lukas Ernstbrunner
GBGlenn Boyce
Glenn Boyce
MIMohamed A. Imam
Mohamed A. Imam
RNRany El Nashar
Rany El Nashar
CGChristian Gerber
Christian Gerber
Background: The purpose of this paper was to determine whether acromial morphology influences anteroposterior shoulder stability. We hypothesized that a more horizontal and higher position of the acromion in the sagittal plane would be associated with posterior instability. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with unidirectional posterior instability were age and sex-matched to a cohort of patients with unidirectional anterior instability. Both cohorts were compared with a control group of patients with no instability and no degenerative glenohumeral (rotator cuff and/or joint surface) or acromial changes. Measurements on radiographs included posterior acromial tilt, anterior and posterior acromial coverage (AAC and PAC), posterior acromial height (PAH), and the critical shoulder angle (CSA). Results: The number of patients enrolled in each instability group was 41, based on a priori power analysis. The control group consisted of 53 shoulders. Of the measured anatomic factors, PAH showed the most significant association with posterior instability (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8; p < 0.001) in the logistic regression model. PAH was significantly greater in the posterior instability group compared with the anterior instability group (30.9 versus 19.5 mm; p < 0.001). With a cutoff value of PAH of 23 mm, the OR for posterior instability was 39. Shoulders with posterior instability were also significantly different from normal shoulders with regard to PAH (p < 0.001), AAC (p < 0.001), and PAC (p < 0.001) whereas, in the shoulders with anterior instability, all of these values except the AAC (p = 0.011) did not differ from those of normal shoulders. Conclusions: Specific acromial morphology is significantly associated with the direction of glenohumeral instability. In shoulders with posterior instability, the acromion is situated higher and is oriented more horizontally in the sagittal plane than in normal shoulders and those with anterior instability; this acromial position may provide less osseous restraint against posterior humeral head translation. A steep “Swiss chalet roof-type” acromion virtually excluded recurrent posterior instability in an albeit relatively small cohort of patients. Additional investigation is needed to determine the relevance of these findings for future treatment. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

9 October 2017 in SICOT-J
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MIMohamed A. Imam
Mohamed A. Imam
JHJames Holton
James Holton
SHSaman Horriat
Saman Horriat
Ahmed NegidaAhmed Negida
Ahmed Negida
FGFlorian Grubhofer
Florian Grubhofer
MSMartyn Snow
Martyn Snow
Tendon pathologies are a group of musculoskeletal conditions frequently seen in clinical practice. They can be broadly classified into traumatic, degenerative and overuse-related tendinopathies. Rotator cuff tears, Achilles tendinopathy and tennis elbow are common examples of these conditions. Conventional treatments have shown inconsistent outcomes and might fail to provide satisfactory clinical improvement. With the growing trend towards the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in other branches of medicine, there is an increasing interest in treating tendon pathologies using the bone marrow MSC. In this article, we provide a systematic literature review documenting the current status of the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) for the treatment of tendon pathologies. We also asked the question on the safety of BMAC and whether there are potential complications associated with BMAC therapy. Our hypothesis is that the use of BMAC provides safe clinical benefit when used for the treatment of tendinopathy or as a biological augmentation of tendon repair. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist while preparing this systematic review. A literature search was carried out including the online databases of PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrial.gov and the Cochrane Library from 1960 to the end of May 2015. Relevant studies were selected and critically appraised. Data from eligible studies were extracted and classified per type of tendon pathology. We included 37 articles discussing the application and use of BMAC for the treatment of tendon pathologies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) appraisal confirmed a satisfactory standard of 37 studies. Studies were sub-categorised into: techniques of extraction, processing and microscopic examination of BMAC (n = 18), where five studies looked at the evaluation of aspiration techniques (n = 5), augmentation of rotator cuff tears (n = 5), augmentation of tendo-achilles tendon (n = 1), treatment of gluteal tendon injuries (n = 1), management of elbow epicondylitis (n = 2), management of patellar tendinopathy (n = 1) and complications related to BMAC (n = 5). Multiple experimental studies investigated the use of BMAC for tendon repair; nonetheless, there are only limited clinical studies available in this field. Unfortunately, due to the scarcity of studies, which were mainly case series, the current level of evidence is weak. We strongly recommend further future randomised controlled studies in this field to allow scientists and clinicians make evidence-based conclusions.

19 September 2016 in Orthopedic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJames Holton
James Holton
MIMohamed A. Imam
Mohamed A. Imam
JWJonathan Ward
Jonathan Ward
MSMartyn Snow
Martyn Snow
The basic science of bone marrow aspirate concentrate in chondral injuries

26 June 2014 in HIP International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MIMohamed A. Imam
Mohamed A. Imam
SBSamuel Barke
Samuel Barke
GSGiles H. Stafford
Giles H. Stafford
DPDavid Parkin
David Parkin
RFRichard E. Field
Richard E. Field
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to gauge clinical performance. The PROMs outcome programme at our centre achieves a preoperative data capture rate of 99%. This falls to 90.6%, 89%, 83% and 79% at the six-week, six-month, one-year and two-year time points, respectively. The study aims were to determine factors associated with patients who did not respond to outcome questionnaires following total hip replacement (THR), and the potential implications this may have when assessing patients following THRs. During the first year of the PROMs programme, 1,322 patients underwent unilateral primary THR at our institution. Of these, 1,311 completed preoperative questionnaires. Thirty-eight patients (2.9%) died within two years of surgery and have been excluded. For the remaining 1,273 patients, we identified those who did not return postoperative questionnaires at each of our review time points. Younger age, lower baseline EQ5D and Oxford Hip scores (OHS) were significantly associated with non-response (p<0.001). Patients with lower satisfaction scores, OHS and EQ5D scores, were less likely to respond to subsequent questionnaires. A significant association between non-response and deprivation (p<0.001) was demonstrated. Our findings suggest that the more satisfied patients are over-represented and our reported outcome results are better than they would have been if all patients had responded. This phenomenon may apply to studies where those categorised as “lost to follow-up” represent a subset of patients who have disengaged due to poor outcome or satisfaction.

1 April 2017 in The Journal of Hand Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAsser Sallam
Asser Sallam
MEMohamed S. El-Deeb
Mohamed S. El-Deeb
MIMohamed A. Imam
Mohamed A. Imam