Traditionally, recommender systems modelled the physical and cyber contextual influence on people's moving, querying, and browsing behaviours in isolation. Yet, searching, querying and moving behaviours are intricately linked, especially indoors. Here, we introduce a tripartite location-query-browse graph (LQB) for nuanced contextual recommendations. The LQB graph consists of three kinds of nodes: locations, queries and Web domains. Directed connections only between heterogeneous nodes represent the contextual influences, while connections of homogeneous nodes are inferred from the contextual influences of the other nodes. This tripartite LQB graph is more reliable than any monopartite or bipartite graph in contextual location, query and Web content recommendations. We validate this LQB graph in an indoor retail scenario with extensive dataset of three logs collected from over 120,000 anonymized, opt-in users over a 1-year period in a large inner-city mall in Sydney, Australia. We characterize the contextual influences that correspond to the arcs in the LQB graph, and evaluate the usefulness of the LQB graph for location, query, and Web content recommendations. The experimental results show that the LQB graph successfully captures the contextual influence and significantly outperforms the state of the art in these applications.

We investigate the impact of popularity bias in false-positive metrics in the offline evaluation of recommender systems. Unlike their true-positive complements, false-positive metrics reward systems that minimize recommendations disliked by users. Our analysis is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to show that false-positive metrics tend to penalise popular items, the opposite behavior of true-positive metrics—causing a disagreement trend between both types of metrics in the presence of popularity biases. We present a theoretical analysis of the metrics that identifies the reason that the metrics disagree and determines rare situations where the metrics might agree—the key to the situation lies in the relationship between popularity and relevance distributions, in terms of their agreement and steepness —two fundamental concepts we formalize. We then examine three well-known datasets using multiple popular true- and false-positive metrics on 16 recommendation algorithms. Specific datasets are chosen to allow us to estimate both biased and unbiased metric values. The results of the empirical study confirm and illustrate our analytical findings. With the conditions of the disagreement of the two types of metrics established, we then determine under which circumstances true-positive or false-positive metrics should be used by researchers of offline evaluation in recommender systems. ¹

Recommender systems aim to suggest relevant items to users among a large number of available items. They have been successfully applied in various industries, such as e-commerce, education and digital health. On the other hand, clustering approaches can help the recommender systems to group users into appropriate clusters, which are considered as neighborhoods in prediction process. Although it is a fact that preferences of users vary over time, traditional clustering approaches fail to consider this important factor. To address this problem, a social recommender system is proposed in this paper, which is based on a temporal clustering approach. Specifically, the temporal information of ratings provided by users on items and also social information among the users are considered in the proposed method. Experimental results on a benchmark dataset show that the quality of recommendations based on the proposed method is significantly higher than the state-of-the-art methods in terms of both accuracy and coverage metrics.

As a popular technique in recommender systems, Collaborative Filtering (CF) has received extensive attention in recent years. However, its privacy-related issues, especially for neighborhood-based CF methods, can not be overlooked. The aim of this study is to address the privacy issues in the context of neighborhood-based CF methods by proposing a Private Neighbor Collaborative Filtering (PNCF) algorithm. The algorithm includes two privacy-preserving operations: Private Neighbor Selection and Recommendation-Aware Sensitivity. Private Neighbor Selection is constructed on the basis of the notion of differential privacy to privately choose neighbors. Recommendation-Aware Sensitivity is introduced to enhance the performance of recommendations. Theoretical and experimental analysis are provided to show the proposed algorithm can preserve differential privacy while retaining the accuracy of recommendations.