Marta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo

Dr. Marta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2024 in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMarta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
Marta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
MCMaria Generosa Crespo-Leiro
Maria Generosa Crespo-Leiro
MCMaria Dolores García-Cosío Carmena
Maria Dolores García-Cosío Carmena
MBManuel Gómez Bueno
Manuel Gómez Bueno
RLRaquel López-Vilella
Raquel López-Vilella
JCJavier Segovia Cubero
Javier Segovia Cubero
There is a long-standing need for a noninvasive biomarker that allows monitoring of cardiac allograft rejection, avoiding the need for periodic endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Multicenter, observational, prospective study, performed between 2019 and 2023 (NCT04973943). All patients underwent 7 per-protocol surveillance EMB during the first postheart transplantation year. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels were determined before each EMB, using Next Generation Sequencing Technology (Allonext assay, Eurofins Genome). The primary end-point was the association between dd-cfDNA levels and the presence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in EMB. The study included 206 patients from 12 centers, with 1,090 pairs of EMB/dd-cfDNA determinations available for analysis. EMB with ACR (n = 49) were associated with dd-cfDNA levels significantly higher than those without, median 0.189% (interquartilic range 0.05-0.70) vs 0.095% (0.04-0.23), p = 0.013. A dd-cfDNA threshold of 0.10% showed a negative predictive value for ACR of 97%. A statistically significant association between N-terminal prohormone of brain (NTProBNP) and dd-cfDNA was also found, with an increase of 0.007% dd-cfDNA (95% confidence interval 0.003-0.011) for every 500 units of NTproBNP, p 0.001. The combination of both biomarkers for diagnosis of ACR showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.681, and this combined approach was significantly better than dd-cfDNA alone (area under the ROC curve 0.603), p = 0.016. Using a cut-off point of 0.10% for dd-cfDNA and 1,000 UI/ml for NTproBNP, negative predictive value increased to 98.1%. dd-cfDNA may be a useful biomarker to rule out significant ACR in a low-risk population. However, a dd-cfDNA value above normal threshold does not correlate robustly with the presence of disease. The combination with NTproBNP, a readily available biomarker, increased the discrimination power of dd-cfDNA alone. Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA as a New Biomarker in Cardiac Acute Rejection, NCT04973943.

6 April 2022 in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMarta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
Marta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
LPLaura Pérez-Gómez
Laura Pérez-Gómez
FHFrancisco J. Hernández-Pérez
Francisco J. Hernández-Pérez
CACarlos Arellano-Serrano
Carlos Arellano-Serrano
MTMario Torres-Sanabria
Mario Torres-Sanabria
JSJavier Segovia-Cubero
Javier Segovia-Cubero
Background: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among long-term heart transplant recipients. There is an unmet need for a non-invasive biomarker of CAV that could obviate the need to perform surveillance coronary angiograms in these patients. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of Donor-derived Cell Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a biomarker of CAV.Methods: We prospectively measured dd-cfDNA levels in all patients undergoing routine coronary angiography >1 year after heart transplant at a single center. Endpoints included the association between dd-cfDNA levels and the presence CAV, according to several prespecified criteria.Results: We included 94 heart transplant recipients, a median of 10.9 years after transplant. Coronary angiogram revealed CAV0, CAV1, CAV2, and CAV3 in 61, 19, 14, and 6% of patients, respectively. Comparison of dd-cfDNA levels in patients with CAV0 and CAV1–2–3 (primary end-point) did not show significant differences (0.92%, IQR 0.46–2.0 vs. 0.46%, IQR 0.075–1.5, p = 0.059), nor did the comparison between patients with stable CAV (no new coronary lesions since previous angiogram, n = 77) and progressive CAV (n = 17); dd-cfDNA values 0.735% (IQR 0.195–2.0) vs. 0.9% (IQR 0.12–1.8), p = 0.76. However, we found an association between NTproBNP levels and CAV degree (p = 0.017). Dd-cfDNA levels did not correlate with NTproBNP (ρ = −0.095).Conclusion: In this study, dd-cfDNA did not perform as a useful biomarker to avoid surveillance coronary angiograms for CAV diagnosis.Clinical Trial Notation: Potential Role of Donor-derived Cell Free DNA as a Biomarker in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy, NCT 04791852.

1 May 2021 in European Heart Journal - Case Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
Marta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
JGJosé Luis Zamorano Gómez
José Luis Zamorano Gómez
SDSusana del Prado Díaz
Susana del Prado Díaz
Gonzalo Luis Alonso SalinasGonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas
Gonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has emerged as a new threat, not only to Health Care systems but also to citizen’s freedom of movement in many developed countries. Case summary: We report a suicidal attempt in a destination therapy left ventricular assist device patient, potentially triggered by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown, highlighting the importance of regular and long-term psychological support for this vulnerable population. Discussion: The psychological consequences of this pandemic, particularly in chronically ill patients, are yet to be defined.

1 June 2024 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
Marta Jimenez-Blanco Bravo
Gonzalo Luis Alonso SalinasGonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas
Gonzalo Luis Alonso Salinas
CECarolina Parra Esteban
Carolina Parra Esteban
JRJorge Toquero Ramos
Jorge Toquero Ramos
MLMiguel Amores Luque
Miguel Amores Luque
VUVíctor Castro Urda
Víctor Castro Urda
Background: The benefit of prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with severe systolic dysfunction of non-ischemic origin is still unclear, and the identification of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death remains a major challenge. Aims/Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) who underwent prophylactic ICD implantation between 2008 and 2020 in two tertiary centers. Our main goal was to identify the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies (anti-tachycardia pacing [ATP] and/or shocks) in this cohort of patients. Results: A total of 224 patients were included. After a median follow-up of 51 months, 61 patients (27.2%) required appropriate ICD therapies. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more frequently men (87% vs. 69%, p = 0.006), of younger age (59 years, (53–65) vs. 64 years, (57–70); p = 0.02), showed more right bundle branch blocks (RBBBs) (15% vs. 4%, p = 0.007) and less left bundle branch blocks (LBBBs) (26% vs. 47%, p = 0.005) in the ECG, and had higher left ventricular end-diastolic (100 mL/m2, (90–117) vs. 86, (71–110); p = 0.011) and systolic volumes (72 mL/m2, (59–87) vs. 61, (47–81), p = 0.05). In a multivariate competing-risks regression analysis, RBBB (HR 2.26, CI 95% 1.02–4.98, p = 0.043) was identified as an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies. Conclusion: RBBBs may help to identify patients with NICM at high risk of ventricular arrhythmias and requiring ICD intervention.