In the field of Sequential Decision Making (SDM), two paradigms have historically vied for supremacy: Automated Planning (AP) and Reinforcement Learning (RL). In the spirit of reconciliation, this article reviews AP, RL and hybrid methods (e.g., novel learn to plan techniques) for solving Sequential Decision Processes (SDPs), focusing on their knowledge representation: symbolic, subsymbolic, or a combination. Additionally, it also covers methods for learning the SDP structure. Finally, we compare the advantages and drawbacks of the existing methods and conclude that neurosymbolic AI poses a promising approach for SDM, since it combines AP and RL with a hybrid knowledge representation.

In the field of Automated Planning there is often the need for a set of planning problems from a particular domain, e.g., to be used as training data for Machine Learning or as benchmarks in planning competitions. In most cases, these problems are created either by hand or by a domain-specific generator, putting a burden on the human designers. In this paper we propose NeSIG, to the best of our knowledge the first domain-independent method for automatically generating planning problems that are valid, diverse and difficult to solve. We formulate problem generation as a Markov Decision Process and train two generative policies with Deep Reinforcement Learning to generate problems with the desired properties. We conduct experiments on three classical domains, comparing our approach against handcrafted, domain-specific instance generators and various ablations. Results show NeSIG is able to automatically generate valid and diverse problems of much greater difficulty (15.5 times more on geometric average) than domain-specific generators, while simultaneously reducing human effort when compared to them. Additionally, it can generalize to larger problems than those seen during training.