The best donor for a related donor for a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype-mismatched transplant for hematological neoplasms is controversial. We studied outcomes in 1210 consecutive transplant recipients treated on a uniform protocol. Younger donors and male donors were associated with less nonrelapse mortality (NRM; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.39; P = .008 and HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.49-0.85; P = .002) and better survival (HR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.54-0.97; P = .033 and HR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.59-0.91; P = .005). Father donors were associated with less NRM (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.45-0.95; P = .02), acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.55-0.86; P = .001), and better survival (HR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.50-0.87; P = .003) compared with mother donors. Children donors were associated with less acute GVHD than sibling donors (HR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.31-0.91; P = .01). Older sister donors were inferior to father donors with regard to NRM (HR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.10-3.20; P = .02) and survival (HR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.05-2.40; P = .03). Noninherited maternal antigen-mismatched sibling donors were associated with the lowest incidence of acute GVHD compared with parental donors and noninherited paternal antigen-mismatched sibling donors. Specific HLA disparities were not significantly correlated with transplant outcomes. Our data indicate which HLA haplotype-mismatched related donors are associated with the best transplant outcomes in persons with hematological neoplasms. Key Points There is a need to identify the best HLA haplotype-mismatched related donor. Use of young, male, NIMA-mismatched donors results in the best survival after HLA haplotype-mismatched related donor transplants.

Small studies suggest an association of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) with primary graft failure (GF) following haploidentical stem cell transplantation, but primary graft rejection (GR) was not discriminated from primary poor graft function (PGF). In this study, we aimed to determine the association of DSAs with primary GF, including GR and PGF, in patients who underwent unmanipulated haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation. A total of 345 subjects were prospectively recruited and randomly selected as training group (n = 173) and validation group (n = 172). Patient plasma/serum was screened. For HLA antibody positive samples with a median fluorescent intensity (MFI) >500, DSAs were further tested using a LABScreen Single Antigen Kit (One Lambda). A total of 342 patients (99.1 %) achieved sustained myeloid engraftment. The median times to neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were 13 days (range, 8–28 days) and 18 days (range, 6–330 days), respectively. The cumulative incidence of primary GF was 6.4 ± 1.3 % and included GR (0.9 ± 0.5 %) and PGF (5.5 ± 1.2 %). Of the 345 cases tested, 39 (11.3 %) were DSA positive. Multivariate models showed that DSAs (MFI ≥ 10,000) were correlated to primary GR (P < 0.001) and that DSAs (MFI ≥ 2000) were strongly associated with primary PGF (P = 0.005). All patients were classified into three groups for analysis. Group A included cases that were DSA negative and those with a DSA MFI <2000 (n = 316), group B included cases with a 2000 ≤ MFI < 10,000 (n = 19), and group C included cases with a MFI ≥10,000 (n = 10). The DSAs were associated with an increased incidence of the primary GF (3.2 vs. 31.6 vs. 60 %, for groups A, B, and C, respectively, P < 0.001), transplant-related mortality (TRM) rate (17.2 vs. 14.7 vs. 33.3 %, for groups A, B, and C, respectively, P = 0.022), and inferior overall survival (OS, 77.3 vs. 85.3 vs. 44.4 %, for groups A, B, and C, respectively, P = 0.015). The primary GF was independently associated with a higher incidence of TRM (P < 0.001), inferior disease-free survival (P < 0.001), and OS (P < 0.001). The findings confirmed the effect of DSAs on primary GF, including GR and PGF, and survival. Our results suggest incorporating DSAs in the algorithm for haploidentical donor selection.

This study compared the effects of pre-transplantation minimal residual disease (pre-MRD) on outcomes in AML patients who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) or who received unmanipulated haploidentical allografts. A retrospective study (n = 339) and a prospective study (n = 340) were performed. MRD was determined using multiparameter flow cytometry. Either after retrospective or prospective analysis, patients with negative pre-MRD (pre-MRDneg) had a lower incidence of relapse than those with positive pre-MRD (pre-MRDpos) in MSDT settings (P < 0.001 for all), but relapse was comparable in Haplo-SCT settings for patients with pre-MRDneg versus pre-MRDpos (P = 0.866 and 0.161, respectively). In either the retrospective (n = 65) or the prospective study (n = 76), pre-MRDpos subjects receiving Haplo-SCT experienced a lower incidence of relapse than those who underwent MSDT (P < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Of the patients with pre-MRDpos in either the total (n = 141) or the subgroup excluding cases which received donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI; n = 105), those who underwent MSDT had a higher incidence of relapse than those receiving haplo-SCT (P < 0.01 for all). Multivariate analysis showed that, for pre-MRDpos cases, haplo-SCT was associated with a low incidence of relapse and with better LFS and OS in either retrospective group, prospective group, combination groups, or subgroup not including cases which received DLI. The results indicated that, for pre-MRD-positive AML patients, haplo-SCT was associated with lower incidence of relapse and better survival, suggesting a stronger anti-leukemia effect.

Poor graft function (PGF) is a serious complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Whether abnormalities of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment are involved in the pathogenesis of PGF is unclear. In the present prospective nested case-control study, 19 patients with secondary PGF, 38 matched patients with good graft function (GGF) after allo-HSCT, and 15 healthy donors (HDs) were enrolled. The cellular elements of the BM microenvironment, including endosteal cells, perivascular cells, and vascular cells, were analyzed by flow cytometry as well as hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining in situ. The median time to occurrence of secondary PGF was 90 days post-transplantation (range, 58 to 264 days). The patients with PGF showed markedly hypocellular marrow (10% versus 45% versus 45%; P < .0001) with scattered hematopoietic cells and significantly lower CD34(+) cells (0.07% versus 0.26% versus 0.26%; P < .0001), endosteal cells (4 per high-power field [hpf] versus 16 per hpf versus 20 per hpf; P < .001), perivascular cells (0.008% versus 0.10% versus 0.12%; P < .0001), and endothelial progenitor cells (0.008% versus 0.16% versus 0.18%; P < .0001) compared with GGF allo-HSCT recipients and HDs, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that endothelial progenitor cells (odds ratio, 150.72; P = .001) and the underlying disease (odds ratio, 18.52; P = .007) were independent risk factors for secondary PGF. Our results suggest that the impaired BM microenvironment may contribute to the occurrence of secondary PGF post-HSCT.

We report the results of a prospective, patient self-selected study evaluating whether haploidentical related donor stem cell transplantation (HRD-HSCT) is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Among totally 419 newly diagnosed AML patients, 132 patients with intermediate- and high-risk cytogenetics achieved CR1 and received chemotherapy alone (n = 74) or HSCT (n = 58) as postremission treatment. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 4 years was 37.5% ± 4.5%. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 4 years were 64.5% ± 5.1% and 55.6% ± 5.0%, respectively. The cumulative incident of relapse for the HRD-HSCT group was significantly lower than that for the chemotherapy-alone group (12.0% ± 4.6% vs 57.8% ± 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001). HRD-HSCT resulted in superior survival compared with chemotherapy alone (4-year DFS, 73.1% ± 7.1% vs 44.2% ± 6.2%, respectively; P < .0001; 4-year OS, 77.5% ± 7.1% vs 54.7% ± 6.3%, respectively; P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed postremission treatment (HRD-HSCT vs chemotherapy) and high WBC counts at diagnosis as independent risk factors affecting relapse, DFS, and OS. Our results suggest that HRD-HSCT is superior to chemotherapy alone as postremission treatment for AML.