Background: 3D printing technology in hospitals facilitates production models such as point-of-care manufacturing. Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology is the specialty that can most benefit from the advantages of these tools. The purpose of this study is to present the results of the integration of 3D printing technology in a Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology and to identify the productive model of the point-of-care manufacturing as a paradigm of personalized medicine. Methods: Observational, descriptive, retrospective and monocentric study of a total of 623 additive manufacturing processes carried out in a Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology from November 2015 to March 2020. Variables such as product type, utility, time or materials for manufacture were analyzed. Results: The areas of expertise that have performed more processes are Traumatology, Reconstructive and Orthopedic Oncology. Pre-operative planning is their primary use. Working and 3D printing hours, as well as the amount of 3D printing material used, vary according to the type of product or material delivered to perform the process. The most commonly used 3D printing material for manufacturing is polylactic acid, although biocompatible resin has been used to produce surgical guides. In addition, the hospital has worked on the co-design of customized implants with manufacturing companies. Conclusions: The integration of 3D printing in a Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology allows identifying the conceptual evolution from “Do-It-Yourself” to “POC manufacturing”.

Objectives: Pelvic tumor resections demand high surgical precision to ensure clear margins while preserving function. Although patient-specific instruments (PSIs) improve osteotomy accuracy, positioning errors remain a limitation. This study evaluates the feasibility, accuracy, and usability of a novel dual-function augmented reality (AR) system for intraoperative guidance in PSI positioning and osteotomy execution using a head-mounted display (HMD). The system provides dual-function support by assisting both PSI placement and osteotomy execution. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric hemipelves underwent AR-assisted internal hemipelvectomy, using customized 3D-printed PSIs and a new in-house AR software integrated into an HMD. Angular and translational deviations between planned and executed osteotomies were measured using postoperative CT analysis. Absolute angular errors were computed from plane normals; translational deviation was assessed as maximum error at the osteotomy corner point in both sagittal (pitch) and coronal (roll) planes. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bland–Altman plots were used to assess intra-workflow cumulative error. Results: The mean absolute angular deviation was 5.11 ± 1.43°, with 86.66% of osteotomies within acceptable thresholds. Maximum pitch and roll deviations were 4.53 ± 1.32 mm and 2.79 ± 0.72 mm, respectively, with 93.33% and 100% of osteotomies meeting translational accuracy criteria. Wilcoxon analysis showed significantly lower angular error when comparing final executed planes to intermediate AR-displayed planes (p < 0.05), supporting improved PSI positioning accuracy with AR guidance. Surgeons rated the system highly (mean satisfaction ≥ 4.0) for usability and clinical utility. Conclusions: This cadaveric study confirms the feasibility and precision of an HMD-based AR system for PSI-guided pelvic osteotomies. The system demonstrated strong accuracy and high surgeon acceptance, highlighting its potential for clinical adoption in complex oncologic procedures.