Vikram Ramnath Rao

Dr. Vikram Ramnath Rao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2021 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKatherine W. Scangos
Katherine W. Scangos
AKAnkit Khambhati
Ankit Khambhati
PDPatrick M. Daly
Patrick M. Daly
GMGhassan S. Makhoul
Ghassan S. Makhoul
LSLeo P. Sugrue
Leo P. Sugrue
ECEdward F. Chang
Edward F. Chang

15 March 2021 in Nature Reviews Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PKPhilippa Karoly
Philippa Karoly
VRVikram Ramnath Rao
Vikram Ramnath Rao
NGNicholas M. Gregg
Nicholas M. Gregg
GWGregory A. Worrell
Gregory A. Worrell
CBChristophe Bernard
Christophe Bernard
MBMaxime Baud
Maxime Baud

1 April 2021 in JAMA Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMarc G. Leguia
Marc G. Leguia
RARalph G. Andrzejak
Ralph G. Andrzejak
CRChristian Rummel
Christian Rummel
JFJoline M. Fan
Joline M. Fan
EMEmily A. Mirro
Emily A. Mirro
MBMaxime Baud
Maxime Baud
Over the centuries, scholars and laymen have sought to explain the periodicity of epileptic seizures by invoking divine1 or demonic2 interventions, celestial motions,3 and hormonal cycles.4 In 1881, Gowers5 described daily seizure patterns, which he termed nocturnal, diurnal, and diffused. In 1938, Griffiths and Fox6 described longer rhythms, ranging from weeks to months, in institutionalized children, men, and women with epilepsy. Today, biological rhythms are known to be ubiquitous,7 with myriad manifestations in medicine. Practicing neurologists commonly encounter patients reporting seizures occurring at the same time of the day6,8,9 or month,6,10 or even during a particular season,6 although such anecdotal clinical observations are seldom quantified.

25 August 2021 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAnkit Khambhati
Ankit Khambhati
ASAlia Shafi
Alia Shafi
VRVikram Ramnath Rao
Vikram Ramnath Rao
ECEdward F. Chang
Edward F. Chang
Responsive neurostimulation designed to abort seizures induces brain plasticity that might predict clinical outcomes in the first year of therapy.

23 December 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMatthias Stangl
Matthias Stangl
UTUros Topalovic
Uros Topalovic
CICory S. Inman
Cory S. Inman
SHSonja Hiller
Sonja Hiller
DVDiane Villaroman
Diane Villaroman
NSNanthia Suthana
Nanthia Suthana

13 July 2020 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BRBabak Razavi
Babak Razavi
VRVikram Ramnath Rao
Vikram Ramnath Rao
CLChristine Lin
Christine Lin
KBKrzysztof A. Bujarski
Krzysztof A. Bujarski
SPSanjay E. Patra
Sanjay E. Patra
CHCasey H. Halpern
Casey H. Halpern
Objective: The RNS System is a direct brain‐responsive neurostimulation system that is US Food and Drug Administration–approved for adults with medically intractable focal onset seizures based on safety and effectiveness data from controlled clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the real‐world safety and effectiveness of the RNS System.Methods: Eight comprehensive epilepsy centers conducted a chart review of patients treated with the RNS System for at least 1 year, in accordance with the indication for use. Data included device‐related serious adverse events and the median percent change in disabling seizure frequency from baseline at years 1, 2, and 3 of treatment and at the most recent follow‐up.Results: One hundred fifty patients met the criteria for analysis. The median reduction in seizures was 67% (interquartile range [IQR] = 33%‐93%, n = 149) at 1 year, 75% (IQR = 50%‐94%, n = 93) at 2 years, 82% (IQR = 50%‐96%, n = 38) at ≥3 years, and 74% (IQR = 50%‐96%, n = 150) at last follow‐up (mean = 2.3 years). Thirty‐five percent of patients had a ≥90% seizure frequency reduction, and 18% of patients reported being clinically seizure‐free at last follow‐up. Seizure frequency reductions were similar regardless of patient age, age at epilepsy onset, duration of epilepsy, seizure onset in mesial temporal or neocortical foci, magnetic resonance imaging findings, prior intracranial monitoring, prior epilepsy surgery, or prior vagus nerve stimulation treatment. The infection rate per procedure was 2.9% (6/150 patients); five of the six patients had an implant site infection, and one had osteomyelitis. Lead revisions were required in 2.7% (4/150), and 2.0% (3/150) of patients had a subdural hemorrhage, none of which had long‐lasting neurological consequences.Significance: In this real‐world experience, safety was similar and clinical seizure outcomes exceeded those of the prospective clinical trials, corroborating effectiveness of this therapy and suggesting that clinical experience has informed more effective programming.