Purpose: To review the outcome of arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in 23 patients. Methods: Records of 9 men and 14 women aged 27 to 88 (mean, 57) years who underwent arthrodesis of the hallux MTP joint using an intramedullary device and an intra-osseous device were reviewed. Indications for surgery were severe hallux valgus (n=15), hallux rigidus (n=6) and rheumatoid arthritis (n=2). Outcome measures included visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux score, bone union, hallux valgus angle (HVA), dorsiflexion angle (DA), complications, revision, and patient satisfaction. Results: The mean follow-up was 19 (range, 6–38) months. The mean AOFAS score improved from 29 to 75.4 (p<0.0001) and the mean VAS for pain improved from 8.1 to 2.4 (p<0.0001). 20 (86%) of the patients were satisfied with the outcome. The mean HVA was 14° and the mean DA was 22°. 19 (83%) of the toes had a well-aligned hallux. 21 (91%) of the patients achieved arthrodesis of the hallux MTP joint. The remaining 2 patients underwent revision surgery for failed fusion or infected non-union; they continued to have transfer metatarsalgia despite bone union. Conclusion: The intramedullary and intra-osseous devices for arthrodesis of the hallux MTP joint achieved good outcome in terms of AOFAS score, VAS for pain, HVA, DA, bone union, and patient satisfaction.

Imaging of the spine is of paramount importance for the recognition of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs), and standard radiography (SR) of the spine is the suggested diagnostic method but is not routinely used because of the cost and radiation exposure considerations. VF assessment (VFA) is an efficient, low radiation method for identifying VFs at the time of bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. Prediction models used to indicate the need for VFA may have little predictive power in subspecialty referral populations such as rheumatologic patients or patients who underwent kyphoplasty. Rheumatologic patients are frequently at increased risk for VFs, and VFA should be performed on an individual basis, also taking in account the guidelines for the general population. Kyphoplasty is a new minimal invasive procedure for the treatment of VFs and is being performed with increasing frequency. Following kyphoplasty, there may be a risk of new VFs in adjacent vertebrae. The assessment and follow-up of patients who underwent kyphoplasty requires repetitive X-ray imaging with the known limitations of SR. Thus, VFA may facilitate the evaluation of VFs in these patients because most of the kyphoplasty patients would fulfill the criteria. In a pilot study, we measured the BMD and performed VFA in 28 patients treated with kyphoplasty. Ratios of anterior to posterior (A/P) and middle to posterior (M/P) height were measured, and Genant’s method was used to classify vertebrae accordingly. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for A/P, M/P and the Genant’s method were determined. Only 1 patient did not meet the criteria for VFA. Of the 364 available vertebrae, 295 could be analyzed. Most missing data (concerning 69 vertebrae) occurred in the upper thoracic region. Three of the 69 non-eligible vertebrae were lumbar vertebrae with cement leakage from the kyphoplasty procedure. In our hands, VFA was highly reproducible, demonstrating very good agreement in terms of intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Agreement was very good on the vertebral level, “vertebrae with kyphoplasty” level and “2 above and 1 below the kyphoplasty vertebrae” level. The application of Genant’s method to these patients also resulted in perfect agreement. We believe that the potential value of VFA in patients treated with kyphoplasty requires further evaluation, particularly comparing VFA with SR and performing a longitudinal follow-up. More research will help to adopt care processes that determine which patients require VFA and how often VFA should be performed, while also considering the impact of this technique on the cost of healthcare organizations.

Different types of plates are available to allow insertion of screws for internal fixation of long bone fractures. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of the insertion of screws at different angles on a long bone to the pull-out strength. Using 3D printed bone models, we tested the pull-out strength of screws in long bones at insertion angles between 0 and 40° with both finite element analysis and on printed models experimentally and compared the results. Test samples and cortical screws used were modeled with SolidWorks software and analyzed with Ansys software. As the screw insertion angle increases, the pull-out forces on the test specimens increase from 61.14 ± 3.5 N at 0° to 273 ± 6.8 N at 40° with an exception of a small drop between 15 and 20° from 235.4 ± 6.2 to 233 ± 6.9 N. Both methods showed an increase in the pull-out strength of screws as the insertion angle increases. This might be applicable in the clinical practice of bone fixation. Further studies on plate and screw fixation are needed to complement the findings.

Purpose: We aimed to study clinical and radiological outcomes of conversion from hemiarthroplasty to Charnley hip replacement (CHR) with a particular concern over reported increased dislocation rate and literature review. Conversion of hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip replacement (THR) is a procedure reported to have high rates of complications. In the literature, there is no specific study on small head conversion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the conversion of failed hip hemiarthroplasty to CHR with the use of modern implants. Methods: The study included 42 patients, who underwent the above procedure. The operations were carried out using a modern Charnley-type THR with a 22-mm diameter of femoral head and a trans-trochanteric approach. The mean follow-up was 75.7 months (range 25–171). Radiographs from the last follow up were evaluated for loosening and other reasons of failure. Clinical outcome was assessed using postoperative pain, function scores, complications and implant survivorship as well as radiological evaluation. Charnley’s modified pain and mobility scoring system were used for clinical and Hodgkinson and Harris’ criteria were used for radiological assessment. Results: Functionally, all of the patients showed improvement. Mean improvement in the pain level was by average of 2.4. On mobility assessment, 38 patients (90.4%) improved. Three patients (7.1%) had recurrent infections and three (4.8%) cases were treated with revision surgery and pseudarthrosis. Further complications occurred in 19.1%, not requiring operative treatment. On radiological evaluation, one (2.4%) case showed cup demarcation without bone loss, two (4.8%) cup migration, and one (2.4%) stem demarcation. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed a survival of 90% at 96 months of follow up (95% CI (confidence interval), 60–90). Conclusion: Larger head might not be the answer to decrease the dislocation rate. Complication rates during revision of hip hemiarthroplasty to modern CHR with 22.225-mm head diameter were comparable to first-time THR revision despite having a smaller head.