Steven Yule

Prof. Dr. Steven Yule

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 February 2018 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RDRoger Daglius Dias
Roger Daglius Dias
MNM. C. Ngo‐Howard
M. C. Ngo‐Howard
MBM. T. Boskovski
M. T. Boskovski
MZM A Zenati
M A Zenati
SYSteven Yule
Steven Yule

1 November 2015 in Journal of Surgical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SYSteven Yule
Steven Yule
SPSarah Henrickson Parker
Sarah Henrickson Parker
JWJill Wilkinson
Jill Wilkinson
AMAileen McKinley
Aileen McKinley
JMJamie MacDonald
Jamie MacDonald
TMTim McAdam
Tim McAdam

1 November 2015 in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHyeyoun Min
Hyeyoun Min
DMDianali Rivera Morales
Dianali Rivera Morales
DODennis Orgill
Dennis Orgill
DSDouglas S. Smink
Douglas S. Smink
SYSteven Yule
Steven Yule

30 March 2018 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SYSteven Yule
Steven Yule
AGA. Gupta
A. Gupta
DGD. Gazarian
D. Gazarian
AGA. Geraghty
A. Geraghty
DSD. S. Smink
D. S. Smink
SPS. Paterson‐Brown
S. Paterson‐Brown

8 February 2022 in Patient Safety in Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPhilip F. Stahel
Philip F. Stahel
LCLorenzo Cobianchi
Lorenzo Cobianchi
FMFrancesca Dal Mas
Francesca Dal Mas
SPSimon Paterson-Brown
Simon Paterson-Brown
BSBoris Eugeniev Sakakushev
Boris Eugeniev Sakakushev
Fausto CatenaFausto Catena
Fausto Catena
The assurance of patient safety in emergency general surgery remains challenging due to the patients’ high-risk underlying conditions and the wide variability in emergency surgical care provided around the globe. The authors of this article convened as an expert panel on patient safety in surgery at the 8thInternational Conference of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) in Edinburgh, Scotland, on September 7–10, 2021. This review article represents the proceedings from the expert panel discussions at the WSES congress and was designed to provide an international perspective on optimizing teamwork and non-technical skills in emergency general surgery.

23 April 2020 in British Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJ C Pradarelli
J C Pradarelli
AGA Gupta
A Gupta
SLS Lipsitz
S Lipsitz
PBP Gabler Blair
P Gabler Blair
ASA K Sachdeva
A K Sachdeva
SYSteven Yule
Steven Yule
Background: Surgeons' non-technical skills are important for patient safety. The Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons assessment tool was developed in the UK and recently adapted to the US surgical context (NOTSS-US). The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and distribution of non-technical skill ratings given by attending (consultant) surgeons who underwent brief online training. Methods: Attending surgeons across six specialties at a large US academic medical centre underwent a 10-min online training, then rated 60-s standardized videos of simulated operations. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and mean(s.d.) values for NOTSS-US ratings were determined for each non-technical skill category (score range 1–5, where 1 indicates poor, 3 average and 5 excellent) and for total NOTSS-US score (range 4–20; sum of 4 category scores). Outcomes were adjusted for rater characteristics including sex, specialty and clinical experience. Results: A total of 8889 ratings were submitted by 81 surgeon raters on 30 simulated intraoperative videos. The mean(s.d.) total NOTSS-US score for all videos was 9·5(4·8) of 20. The within-video ICC for total NOTSS-US score was 0·64 (95 per cent c.i. 0·57 to 0·70). For individual non-technical skill categories, the ICC was highest for social skills (communication/teamwork: 0·63, 95 per cent c.i. 0·56 to 0·71; leadership: 0·64, 0·55 to 0·72) and lowest for cognitive skills (situation awareness: 0·54, 0·45 to 0·62; decision-making: 0·50, 0·41 to 0·59). Women gave higher total NOTSS-US scores than men (adjusted mean difference 0·93, 95 per cent c.i. 0·44 to 1·43; P = 0·001). Conclusion: After brief online training, the inter-rater reliability of the NOTSS-US assessment tool achieved moderate strength among trained surgeons rating simulated intraoperative videos.