Grant Norte

Dr. Grant Norte

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2022 in Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GNGrant Norte
Grant Norte
JRJustin Rush
Justin Rush
DSDavid Sherman
David Sherman
Context: Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) impedes the recovery of muscle function following joint injury, and in a broader sense, acts as a limiting factor in rehabilitation if left untreated. Despite a call to treat the underlying pathophysiology of muscle dysfunction more than three decades ago, the continued widespread observations of post-traumatic muscular impairments are concerning, and suggest that interventions for AMI are not being successfully integrated into clinical practice. Objectives: To highlight the clinical relevance of AMI, provide updated evidence for the use of clinically accessible therapeutic adjuncts to treat AMI, and discuss the known or theoretical mechanisms for these interventions. Evidence Acquisition: PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases were searched for articles that investigated the effectiveness or efficacy of interventions to treat outcomes relevant to AMI. Evidence Synthesis: 122 articles that investigated an intervention used to treat AMI among individuals with pathology or simulated pathology were retrieved from 1986 to 2021. Additional articles among uninjured individuals were considered when discussing mechanisms of effect. Conclusion: AMI contributes to the characteristic muscular impairments observed in patients recovering from joint injuries. If left unresolved, AMI impedes short-term recovery and threatens patients’ long-term joint health and well-being. Growing evidence supports the use of neuromodulatory strategies to facilitate muscle recovery over the course of rehabilitation. Interventions should be individualized to meet the needs of the patient through shared clinician–patient decision-making. At a minimum, we propose to keep the treatment approach simple by attempting to resolve inflammation, pain, and effusion early following injury.


1 November 2019 in Physical Therapy in Sport
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GNGrant Norte
Grant Norte
HSHaley Solaas
Haley Solaas
SSSusan Saliba
Susan Saliba
JGJohn Goetschius
John Goetschius
LSLindsay V. Slater
Lindsay V. Slater
JHJoseph M. Hart
Joseph M. Hart

2 January 2020 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSarah A. Scheurer
Sarah A. Scheurer
DSDavid A. Sherman
David A. Sherman
NGNeal R. Glaviano
Neal R. Glaviano
CIChristopher D. Ingersoll
Christopher D. Ingersoll
GNGrant Norte
Grant Norte

1 May 2018 in Journal of Athletic Training
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GNGrant Norte
Grant Norte
JHJay N. Hertel
Jay N. Hertel
SSSusan A. Saliba
Susan A. Saliba
DDDavid R. Diduch
David R. Diduch
JHJoseph M. Hart
Joseph M. Hart
Context: : Central and peripheral neural adaptations have been identified after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction (ACLR) and are hypothesized to contribute to posttraumatic muscle dysfunction. Limited evidence exists about the temporal nature of neuromuscular adaptations during early and late-term phases of recovery after ACLR, and no researchers have studied patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Objective: : To compare quadriceps neuromuscular function less than 2 years (early) and more than 2 years (late) after ACLR, including in patients who experienced posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis. Design: : Cross-sectional study. Setting: : Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: : A total of 72 patients after ACLR, consisting of 34 early (9.0 ± 4.3 months postsurgery), 30 late (70.5 ± 41.6 months postsurgery), and 8 with osteoarthritis (115.9 ± 110.0 months postsurgery), and 30 healthy control volunteers. Main Outcome Measure(s): : Quadriceps function was measured bilaterally during a single visit to determine normalized Hoffmann reflex (H : M ratio), knee-extension maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque (Nm/kg), central activation ratio (%), fatigue index (% decline), and active motor threshold (%). Comparisons were made using 2-way analyses of variance to identify the effect of limb and group on each outcome measure. We calculated Cohen d effect sizes to assess the magnitude of difference between ACLR and matched control limbs for each group. Results: : Compared with healthy control limbs, involved-limb maximal voluntary isometric contraction was lower among all patients after ACLR (P < .001, Cohen d values = −1.00 to −1.75). The central activation ratio (P < .001, Cohen d = −1.74) and fatigue index (P = .003, Cohen d = −0.95) were lower among patients only early after ACLR. The active motor threshold was higher among all patients after ACLR (P < .001, Cohen d values = −0.42 to −1.56). Conclusions: : Neuromuscular impairments were present in patients early and late after ACLR, regardless of osteoarthritis status. Quadriceps strength and corticospinal excitability were impaired at each time point compared with values in healthy control individuals, suggesting the need to address cortical function early after ACLR.

23 January 2019 in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBStephan G. Bodkin
Stephan G. Bodkin
GNGrant Norte
Grant Norte
JHJoseph M. Hart
Joseph M. Hart