Alberto Traverso

Dr. Alberto Traverso

Department of Mechanical, Energy, Management and Transportation Engineering, University of Genova, via Montallegro 1, 16145, Genoa, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IRIacopo Rossi
Iacopo Rossi
ATAlberto Traverso
Alberto Traverso
DTDavid Tucker
David Tucker

1 July 2020 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGustavo Bonolo de Campos
Gustavo Bonolo de Campos
CBCleverson Bringhenti
Cleverson Bringhenti
ATAlberto Traverso
Alberto Traverso
JTJesuino Takachi Tomita
Jesuino Takachi Tomita

1 June 2021 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LMLuca Mantelli
Luca Mantelli
MFM.L. Ferrari
M.L. Ferrari
ATAlberto Traverso
Alberto Traverso

28 March 2007 in Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mario Luigi FerrariMario Luigi Ferrari
Mario Luigi Ferrari
ELEric Liese
Eric Liese
DTDavid Tucker
David Tucker
LLLarry Lawson
Larry Lawson
ATAlberto Traverso
Alberto Traverso
AMAristide F. Massardo
Aristide F. Massardo
This paper describes the experimental validation of two different transient models of the hybrid fuel cell/gas turbine facility of the U.S. DOE-NETL at Morgantown. The first part of this work is devoted to the description of the facility, designed to experimentally investigate these plants with real components, except the fuel cell. The behavior of the SOFC is obtained with apt volumes (for the stack and the off-gas burner) and using a combustor to generate similar thermal effects. The second part of this paper shows the facility real-time transient model developed at the U.S. DOE-NETL and the detailed transient modeling activity using the TRANSEO program developed at TPG. The results obtained with both models are successfully compared with the experimental data of two different load step decreases. The more detailed model agrees more closely with the experimental data, which, of course, is more time consuming than the real-time model (the detailed model operates with a calculation over calculated time ratio around 6). Finally, the TPG model has been used to discuss the importance of performance map precision for both compressor and turbine. This is an important analysis to better understand the steady-state difference between the two models.

7 October 2014 in Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLuca Larosa
Luca Larosa
ATAlberto Traverso
Alberto Traverso
Mario Luigi FerrariMario Luigi Ferrari
Mario Luigi Ferrari
VZValentina Zaccaria
Valentina Zaccaria
In this paper, two different advanced control approaches for a pressurized solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) hybrid system are investigated and compared against traditional proportional integral derivative (PID). Both advanced control methods use model predictive control (MPC): in the first case, the MPC has direct access to the plant manipulated variables, in the second case, the MPC operates on the setpoints of PIDs which control the plant. In the second approach, the idea is to use MPC at the highest level of the plant control system to optimize the performance of bottoming PIDs, retaining system stability and operator confidence. Two MIMO (multi-input multi-output) controllers were obtained: fuel cell power and cathode inlet temperature are the controlled variables; fuel cell bypass flow, current and fuel mass flow rate (the utilization factor kept constant) are the manipulated variables. The two advanced control methods were tested and compared against the conventional PID approach using a SOFC hybrid system model. Then, the MPC controller was implemented in the hybrid system emulator test rig developed by the thermochemical power group (TPG) at the University of Genoa. Experimental tests were carried out to compare MPC against classic PID method: load following tests were carried out. Ramping the fuel cell load from 100% to 80% and back, keeping constant the target of the cathode inlet temperature, the MPC controller was able to reduce the mismatch between the actual and the target values of the cathode inlet temperature from 7 K maximum of the PID controller to 3 K maximum, showing more stable behavior in general.

15 November 2019 in Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAvinash Renuke
Avinash Renuke
AVAlberto Vannoni
Alberto Vannoni
MPMatteo Pascenti
Matteo Pascenti
ATAlberto Traverso
Alberto Traverso
Interest in small-scale turbines is growing mainly for small-scale power generation and energy harvesting. Conventional bladed turbines impose manufacturing limitations and higher cost, which hinder their implementation at small scale. This paper focuses on experimental and numerical performance investigation of Tesla type turbines for micro power generation. A flexible test rig for Tesla turbine fed with air as working fluid has been developed, of about 100 W net mechanical power, with modular design of two convergent-divergent nozzles to get subsonic as well as supersonic flow at the exit. Seals are incorporated at the end disks to minimize leakage flow. Extensive experiments are done by varying design parameters such as disk thickness, gap between disks, radius ratio, and outlet area of exhaust with speeds ranging from 10,000 rpm to 40,000 rpm. A quasi-one-dimensional (1D) model of the whole setup is created and tuned with experimental data to capture the overall performance. Major losses, ventilation losses at end disks, and nozzle and exhaust losses are evaluated experimentally and numerically. Effect of design parameters on the performance of Tesla turbines is discussed.