Citation: Apalla Z, Papageorgiou C, Lallas A, Delli F, Fotiadou C, Kemanetzi C, Lazaridou E. Cutaneous adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a literature review. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(1):e2021155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1101a155 Accepted: September 28, 2020; Published: January 29, 2021 Copyright: ©2021 Apalla et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC-4.0, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: None. Competing interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Authorship: Z.A. and C.P. contributed equally to the preparation of the manuscript. All authors have contributed significantly to this publication. Corresponding author: Zoe Apalla, MD, PhD, Second Dermatology Department, Schoo of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Anatolis 5, 55535, Thessaloniki, Greece. Email: zoimd@yahoo.gr Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are targeted molecules that modulate the immune system, assist with self-tolerance, and minimize collateral tissue damage when immune responses are activated. Although they are characterized by a favorable risk/benefit ratio, immune checkpoint blockade has been associated with a new subset of autoimmune-like toxicities, named immune-related adverse events (irAE). Dermatologic reactions are among the most prevalent irAE triggered by CPIs. In a majority of cases they are self-limiting and readily manageable. However, it is not uncommon that they result in severe skin involvement and impairment of patients’ quality of life. Awareness of the spectrum of cutaneous irAEs is mandatory for every clinician involved in the management of oncologic patients. The role of the dermatologists is essential because early recognition and appropriate management of skin toxicity may prevent dose modifications and discontinuation of CPIs. The latter is particularly relevant, considering that recent data suggest favorable oncologic response in patients developing irAEs. Keywords : immune checkpoint inhibitors, skin toxicity, adverse effects, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Background: The group of histopathologically aggressive BCC subtypes includes morpheaform, micronodular, infiltrative and metatypical BCC. Since these tumors are at increased risk of recurring, micrographically controlled surgery is considered the best therapeutic option. Although dermoscopy significantly improves the clinical recognition of BCC, scarce evidence exists on their dermoscopic criteria. Aim: To investigate the dermoscopic characteristics of histopathologically aggressive BCC subtypes. Materials and Methods: Dermoscopic images of morpheaform, micronodular, infiltrative and metatypical BCC were analyzed for the presence of predefined variables. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. Results: Most histopathologically aggressive BCCs were located on the head and neck. Infiltrative was the most common subtype. All subtypes, except micronodular BCC, rarely displayed dermoscopic pigmentation. The most frequent dermoscopic features of infiltrative BCC were arborizing vessels (67.1%), shiny white structures (48.6%) and ulceration (52.9%). The features prevailing in morpheaform BCC were arborizing vessels (68.4%), ulceration (n = 12, 63.2%) and white porcelain areas (47.4%). Micronodular BCC was typified by milky red structureless areas (53.8%), arborizing vessels (53.8%), short fine telangiectasias (50%), ulceration (46.2%) and blue structures (57.7%). The most common findings in metatypical BCC were arborizing vessels (77.8%), shiny white structures (66.7%), ulceration (62.9%) and keratin mass (29.6%). Limitations: Study population of only white skin and relatively small sample size in some groups. Conclusions: Our study provided data on the clinical, dermoscopic and epidemiological characteristics of histopathologically aggressive BCCs.

Introduction Nail toxicity represents one of the most common cutaneous adverse effects of both classic chemotherapeutic agents and new oncologic drugs, including targeted treatments and immunotherapy. Objectives We aimed to provide a comprehensive literature review of nail toxicities derived from conventional chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies (EGFR inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors, BRAF and MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including clinical presentation, implicated drugs and approaches for prevention and management. Methods Retrieved literature from PubMed registry database was reviewed to include all articles published up to May 2021 relevant to the clinical presentation, diagnosis, incidence, prevention, and treatment of oncologic treatment-induced nail toxicity. The was searched for relevant studies. Results A wide spectrum of nail toxicities is associated with both, conventional and newer anticancer agents. The frequency of nail involvement, especially with immunotherapy and new targeted agents remains unknown and patients with different cancer types receiving different regimens may develop the same nail disorder, whereas patients with the same type of cancer under the same chemotherapeutic treatment may develop different types of nail alterations. The underlying mechanisms of the varying individual susceptibility and the diverse nail responses to various anticancer treatments need further investigation. Conclusion Early recognition and treatment of nail toxicities can minimize their impact, allowing better adherence to conventional and newer oncologic treatments. Dermatologists, oncologists and other implicated physicians should be aware of these burdensome adverse effects in order to guide management and prevent impairment of patients’ quality of life.

Lichen planus (LP) is an inflammatory disease that affects the skin-mainly the extremities and the trunk-the mucous membranes, the genitalia, the nails and the scalp. The diagnosis of LP is usually established clinically based on the typical morphology and distribution of the lesions in conjunction with the associated itch. We report a patient with LP manifesting highly psoriasiform lesions, that could only be correctly assessed after the application of dermoscopy, which revealed LP-specific findings.