Quantum processors need to improve their reliability to scale up the number of qubits and increase the number of algorithms that can execute. To reduce the logical error rate of the quantum systems, the use of error correction codes and decoders has been established as a low-cost and feasible approach, with good results from a theoretical perspective, for mid and long-term architectures. While most of the authors are focused on the algorithms to improve the correction capability of quantum computers, without taking into account a fundamental implementation aspect for their deployment in a real system, i.e. , their latency must be bounded to avoid the qubit decoherence, only a few propose hardware architectures and they just include time estimations of their decoding latency. However, a real implementation has not been shown yet. In this work, we analyze from the point of view of hardware implementation two algorithmic options based on quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) codes: a) belief propagation min-sum decoders combined with codes with good error-floor behavior and b) belief propagation min-sum decoders concatenated with ordered statistics decoders (OSDs) for codes with early error-floor. The bounds for the maximum clock frequency required by the decoders to decode within the qubit coherence time are established as a parameter to show if a practical implementation is possible with the present or near future FPGA technology. Furthermore, real implementation results for a Xilinx FPGA device are provided, showing that some solutions can meet the timing constraints set up by the state-of-the-art quantum processors.
21 August 2014 in IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
Nonbinary low-density parity-check (NB-LDPC) codes have become an efficient alternative to their binary counterparts in different scenarios, such as moderate codeword lengths, high-order modulations, and burst error correction. Unfortunately, the complexity of NB-LDPC decoders is still too high for practical applications, especially for the check node (CN) processing, which limits the maximum achievable throughput. Although a great effort has been made in the recent literature to overcome this disadvantage, the proposed decoders are still not ready for high-speed implementations for high-order fields. In this paper, a simplified trellis min-max algorithm is proposed, where the CN messages are computed in a parallel way using only the most reliable information. The proposed CN algorithm is implemented using a horizontal layered schedule. The overall decoder architecture has been implemented in a 90-nm CMOS process for a (N = 837 and K = 726) NB-LDPC code over GF(32), achieving a throughput of 660 Mb/s at nine iterations based on postlayout results. This decoder increases hardware efficiency compared with the existing recent solutions for the same code.
In this letter, a new algorithm to decode non-binary LDPC (NB-LDPC) codes is proposed. This algorithm is inspired from very low complexity decoders that have been proposed recently, in which only syndrome computations at the check node update are used, while performing symbol-flipping based update at the variable node. Usually, the low complexity decoders based on symbol flipping suffer from a non-negligible performance degradation compared to soft-decision NB-LDPC decoders. Our improved decoder makes use of a list of syndrome computations instead of a single one based on hard-decision, and builds soft information at the variable node input by assigning votes weighted by different amplitudes. Simulations show that using multiple votes with multiple weights yields better performance, while still maintaining the low complexity feature.
8 October 2014 in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers
A one minimum only decoder for Trellis-EMS (OMO T-EMS) and for Trellis-Min-max (OMO T-MM) is proposed in this paper. In this novel approach, we avoid computing the second minimum in messages of the check node processor, and propose efficient estimators to infer the second minimum value. By doing so, we greatly reduce the complexity and at the same time improve latency and throughput of the derived architectures compared to the existing implementations of EMS and Min-max decoders. This solution has been applied to various NB-LDPC codes constructed over different Galois fields and with different degree distributions showing in all cases negligible performance loss compared to the ideal EMS and Min-max algorithms. In addition, two complete decoders for OMO T-EMS and OMO T-MM were implemented for the (837,726) NB-LDPC code over GF(32) for comparison proposals. A 90 nm CMOS process was applied, achieving a throughput of 711 Mbps and 818 Mbps respectively at a clock frequency of 250 MHz, with an area of 19.02 mm 2 and 16.10 mm 2 after place and route. To the best knowledge of the authors, the proposed decoders have higher throughput and area-time efficiency than any other solution for high-rate NB-LDPC codes with high Galois field order.
4 February 2016 in IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
Nonbinary LDPC codes outperform their binary counterparts in different scenarios. However, they require a considerable increase in complexity, especially in the check-node (CN) processor, for high-order Galois fields (GFs) higher than GF(16). To overcome this drawback, we propose an approximation for the trellis min-max algorithm that allows us to reduce the number of exchanged messages between the CN and the variable node compared with previous proposals from the literature. On the other hand, we reduce the complexity in the CN processor, keeping the parallel computation of messages. We implemented a layered scheduled decoder, based on this algorithm, in a 90-nm CMOS technology for the (837, 723) NB-LDPC code over GF(32) and the (1536, 1344) over GF(64), achieving an area saving of 16% and 36% for the CN and 10% and 12% for the whole decoder, respectively. The throughput is 1.07 and 1.26 Gb/s, which outperforms the state of the art of high-rate decoders with the high GF order from the literature.
15 June 2011 in Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing