In recent years, the use of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) to deliver care for patients with breast cancer has increased exponentially. This study aimed to summarize the available evidence on developing mHealth apps to care for patients with breast cancer and identify the need for systematic efforts. A scoping review was performed according to Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, aiming to identify eligible research studies in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science between January 2010 and December 2020. All identified studies were screened, extracted, and analyzed independently by two reviewers. A total of 676 studies were retrieved, and eight eligible studies were finally included. Four themes emerged: the involvement of patients and health professionals in the phases of design and development, patients’ preferences, the characteristics of patients, and the motivators to use mHealth apps. The results indicated promising prospects for using mHealth apps to care for patients with breast cancer and identified the need for systematic efforts to develop and validate relevant apps. The attributes of patient characteristics, needs, and patient-reported outcomes data are vital components for developing mHealth apps for patients with breast cancer. Additionally, collaborative efforts, including patients, nurses, and other significant health professionals, should develop mHealth apps for breast cancer care. Additional research focusing on the design and development of mHealth apps for patients with breast cancer is warranted.

This scoping review aims to summarize online health information seeking (OHIS) behavior among breast cancer patients and survivors, identify research gaps, and offer insights for future studies. Following Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, we conducted a review across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed, covering literature from 1 January 2014 to 13 August 2023. A total of 1,368 articles were identified, with 33 meeting the inclusion criteria. Two researchers independently screened, extracted, and summarized the data. The studies addressed three main themes:OHIS behavior, factors associated with OHIS, and intervention programs on OHIS. Key information sources included national or nonprofit cancer organizations’ websites, search engines, and social media. Commonly sought information involved breast cancer knowledge, treatment options, and prognosis, with information seeking behaviors varying by disease stages. While patients valued the convenience and accessibility of online resources, dissatisfaction was common due to inaccurate or misleading content. Factors such as age, education, income, disease characteristics, and psychological factors significantly influenced OHIS behaviors. This review identifies significant gaps in exploring OHIS behavior among breast cancer patients and survivors, highlighting the inadequacy of current interventions. Future research should focus on diverse age groups, refine the language of web-based health information, enhance user comprehension of professional content, and develop tailored information systems for different stages of the health journey.

Background: The PROMIS-57 is a commonly used self-reported instrument to solve the lack of generalizable and universal measures required to evaluate common symptoms and functions from patients’ perspectives. This study aimed to translate the PROMIS-57 into Chinese and psychometrically test the translated instrument on patients with breast cancer. Methods: Translation, cross‑cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the instrument were performed from June 2020 to June 2021. Eligible patients were recruited and completed the PROMIS-57, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Results: Data from 602 patients with a mean age of 48.83 years were analyzed. Most domains in the PROMIS-57 showed an absence of floor and ceiling effects. Multi-trait scaling analysis demonstrated acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. The correlations between the PROMIS-57 scores and the selected FACT-B scores supported the criterion validity via the Pearson correlation test. Measurement invariance was supported by the absence of differential item functioning for most items. Cronbach’s α of the domains ranged from 0.85–0.95. The unidimensional factor structure of all domains was supported using confirmatory factor analyses. Additionally, most items showed acceptable item information curves and item characteristics curve matrices. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the PROMIS-57 was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing common symptoms and functions among patients with breast cancer.

This study aimed to synthesize the available knowledge of symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer and identify predictors associated with these trajectories. Whittemore and Knafl’s integrative review method was employed to guide a systematic search for literature in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL). The retrieved articles’ publication time was limited to 2010 to 2020, and only peer-reviewed English articles were included. Twenty-seven articles were included. The findings of the relevant studies were analyzed using thematic analysis. They were grouped into two themes: symptom trajectories of patients with breast cancer (symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer, in patients who underwent surgery, and in patients who received cancer-related treatment) and associated factors (socioeconomic factors, health characteristics, cancer-related treatment characteristics). Newly diagnosed patients tended to report high trajectories of depression and persistent sleep disturbance. Most patients who underwent surgery reported significant sleep disturbance and anxiety shortly after surgery. For patients who received cancer-related treatment, only a small proportion had a high level of physical activity after cancer-related therapy over time. A high body mass index, a low relationship quality, parental responsibilities, insufficient social support, a low educational background, and an unhealthy lifestyle may increase the risk of negative symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer. Additionally, old patients were more likely to report cognitive impairment after chemotherapy, while young patients tended to report trajectories of persistent sexual dysfunction. Concurring symptoms and poor health status also contributed to adverse symptom trajectories. The findings of this review add to the body of knowledge of the interindividual variability of symptom trajectories in patients with breast cancer. Despite the overall similarity in appraisal at baseline, the patients reported varied symptom trajectories over time. It is recommended that nurses consider sociodemographic, clinical and cancer-related treatment characteristics and perform targeted early preventive interventions for patients with breast cancer.