Neurofibromatosis (NF) is a neurocutaneous syndrome characterized by the development of tumors of the central or peripheral nervous system including the brain, spinal cord, organs, skin, and bones. There are three types of NF: NF1 accounting for 96% of all cases, NF2 in 3%, and schwannomatosis (SWN) in <1%. The NF1 gene is located on chromosome 17q11.2, which encodes for a tumor suppressor protein, neurofibromin, that functions as a negative regulator of Ras/MAPK and PI3K/mTOR signaling pathways. The NF2 gene is identified on chromosome 22q12, which encodes for merlin, a tumor suppressor protein related to ezrin-radixin-moesin that modulates the activity of PI3K/AKT, Raf/MEK/ERK, and mTOR signaling pathways. In contrast, molecular insights on the different forms of SWN remain unclear. Inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor genes SMARCB1 and LZTR1 are considered responsible for a majority of cases. Recently, treatment strategies to target specific genetic or molecular events involved in their tumorigenesis are developed. This study discusses molecular pathways and related targeted therapies for NF1, NF2, and SWN and reviews recent clinical trials which involve NF patients.
The microvasculature and immune cells are major components of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Hypoxia plays a pivotal role in the TME through hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) which upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF, an angiogenesis stimulator, suppresses tumor immunity by inhibiting the maturation of dendritic cells, and induces immunosuppressive cells such as regulatory T cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. HIF-1α directly induces immune checkpoint molecules. VEGF/VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-targeted therapy as a cancer treatment has not only anti-angiogenic effects, but also immune-supportive effects. Anti-angiogenic therapy has the potential to change the immunological “cold tumors” into the “hot tumors”. Glioblastoma (GB) is a hypervascular tumor with high VEGF expression which leads to development of an immuno suppressive TME. Therefore, in the last decade, several combination immunotherapies with anti-angiogenic agents have been developed for numerous tumors including GBs. In particular, combination therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy has been suggested as a synergic treatment strategy that may show favorable changes in the TME. In this article, we discuss the cross talk among immunosuppressive cells exposed to VEGF in the hypoxic TME of GBs. Current efficient combination strategies using VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy are reviewed and proposed as novel cancer treatments.
Although vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes the immunosuppressive microenvironment, the efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) on tumor immunity has not been fully investigated. The present study used 47 glioblastoma tissues obtained at 3 different settings: tumors of initial resection (naïve Bev group), tumors resected following Bev therapy (effective Bev group), and recurrent tumors after Bev therapy (refractory Bev group). The paired samples of the initial and post‐Bev recurrent tumors from 9 patients were included. The expression of programmed cell death‐1 (PD‐1)/PD ligand‐1 (PD‐L1), CD3, CD8, Foxp3, and CD163 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The PD‐L1+ tumor cells significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (P <.01 for each). The PD‐1+ cells significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (P <.01 for each). The amount of CD3+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration increased in the refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (CD3, P <.01; CD8, P =.06). Both Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and CD163+ tumor‐associated macrophages significantly decreased in the effective or refractory Bev group compared with the naïve Bev group (Foxp3, P <.01 for each; CD163, P <.01 for each). These findings were largely confirmed by comparing paired initial and post‐Bev recurrent tumors. Bevacizumab restores the immunosupportive tumor microenvironment in glioblastomas, and this effect persists during long‐term Bev therapy.
Cavernous sinus (CS) invasion is an aggressive behavior exhibited by pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). The cause of CS invasion in PitNETs has not been fully elucidated. The tumor immune microenvironment, known to promote aggressive behavior in various types of tumors, has not been examined for PitNETs. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) signaling is strongly associated with the tumor immune microenvironment. In the present study, these molecular and histopathological characteristics were examined in invasive non-functional PitNETs (NF-PitNETs). Twenty-seven patients with newly diagnosed NF-PitNETs (with CS invasion: 17, without CS invasion: 10) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for VEGF-A/VEGFR1 and 2, hypoxia-inducible Factor (HIF), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immunosuppressive cells including regulatory T cells (Tregs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and immune checkpoint molecules. Previously validated tumor proliferation markers including mitotic count, Ki-67 index, and p53 were also analyzed for their expressions in NF-PitNETs. VEGF-A and VEGFR1 were expressed on not only vascular endothelial cells, but also on tumor cells. The expressions of VEGF-A and VEGFR1 were significantly higher in NF-PitNETs with CS invasion. The number of TAMs and the expression of PD-L1 were also significantly higher in NF-PitNETs with CS invasion than in NF-PitNETs without CS invasion. The high expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR1 and associated immunosuppressive microenvironment were observed in NF-PitNETs with CS invasion, suggesting that a novel targeted therapy can be applied.