Nanjoo Suh

Prof. Dr. Nanjoo Suh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 February 2020 in Molecular Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CChung S. Yang
Chung S. Yang
PLPhilip Luo
Philip Luo
ZZZishuo Zeng
Zishuo Zeng
HWHong Wang
Hong Wang
MMMokenge Malafa
Mokenge Malafa
NSNanjoo Suh
Nanjoo Suh

31 January 2016 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
THTae-Hwe Heo
Tae-Hwe Heo
JWJoseph Wahler
Joseph Wahler
NSNanjoo Suh
Nanjoo Suh
Potential therapeutic implications of IL-6/IL-6R/gp130–targeting agents in breast cancer

11 January 2016 in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSoumyasri Das Gupta
Soumyasri Das Gupta
NSNanjoo Suh
Nanjoo Suh

1 October 2000 in Molecular Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YWYongping Wang
Yongping Wang
WPWeston W. Porter
Weston W. Porter
NSNanjoo Suh
Nanjoo Suh
THTadashi Honda
Tadashi Honda
GGGordon Gribble
Gordon Gribble
MSMichael B. Sporn
Michael B. Sporn
A novel synthetic triterpenoid, 2-cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9-dien-28-oic acid (CDDO), previously reported to have potent differentiating, antiproliferative, and antiinflammatory activities, has been identified as a ligand for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ). CDDO induces adipocytic differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells, although it is not as potent as the full agonist of PPARγ, rosiglitazone. Binding studies of CDDO to PPARγ using a scintillation proximity assay give a Ki between 10−8 to 10−7m. In transactivation assays, CDDO is a partial agonist for PPARγ. The methyl ester of CDDO, CDDO-Me, binds to PPARγ with similar affinity, but is an antagonist. Like other PPARγ ligands, CDDO synergizes with a retinoid X receptor (RXR)-specific ligand to induce 3T3-L1 differentiation, while CDDO-Me is an antagonist in this assay. The partial agonism of CDDO and the antagonism of CDDO-Me reflect the differences in their capacity to recruit or displace cofactors of transcriptional regulation; CDDO and rosiglitazone both release the nuclear receptor corepressor, NCoR, from PPARγ, while CDDO-Me does not. The differences between CDDO and rosiglitazone as either partial or full agonists, respectively, are seen in the weaker ability of CDDO to recruit the coactivator CREB-binding protein, CBP, to PPARγ. Our results establish the triterpenoid CDDO as a member of a new class of PPARγ ligands.

1 October 2016 in Seminars in Cancer Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMin Ji Bak
Min Ji Bak
SGSoumyasri Das Gupta
Soumyasri Das Gupta
JWJoseph Wahler
Joseph Wahler
NSNanjoo Suh
Nanjoo Suh

1 October 2017 in The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNaing Lin Shan
Naing Lin Shan
JWJoseph Wahler
Joseph Wahler
HLHong Jin Lee
Hong Jin Lee
MBMin Ji Bak
Min Ji Bak
SGSoumyasri Das Gupta
Soumyasri Das Gupta
NSNanjoo Suh
Nanjoo Suh