Our knowledge regarding the contribution of the innate immune system in recognizing and subsequently initiating a host response to an invasion of RNA virus has been rapidly growing over the last decade. Descriptions of the receptors involved and the molecular mechanisms they employ to sense viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns have emerged in great detail. This review presents an overview of our current knowledge regarding the receptors used to detect RNA virus invasion, the molecular structures these receptors sense, and the involved downstream signaling pathways.

Type III interferons (IFNs) (interleukin-28/29 or lambda interferon [IFN-λ]) are cytokines with IFN-like activities. Here we show that several classes of viruses induce expression of IFN-λ1 and -λ2/3 in similar patterns. The IFN-λs were—unlike alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β)—induced directly by stimulation with IFN-α or -λ, thus identifying type III IFNs as IFN-stimulated genes. In vitro assays revealed that IFN-λs have appreciable antiviral activity against encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) but limited activity against herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), whereas IFN-α potently restricted both viruses. Using three murine models for generalized virus infections, we found that while recombinant IFN-α reduced the viral load after infection with EMCV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), and HSV-2, treatment with recombinant IFN-λ in vivo did not affect viral load after infection with EMCV or LCMV but did reduce the hepatic viral titer of HSV-2. In a model for a localized HSV-2 infection, we further found that IFN-λ completely blocked virus replication in the vaginal mucosa and totally prevented development of disease, in contrast to IFN-α, which had a more modest antiviral activity. Finally, pretreatment with IFN-λ enhanced the levels of IFN-γ in serum after HSV-2 infection. Thus, type III IFNs are expressed in response to most viruses and display potent antiviral activity in vivo against select viruses. The discrepancy between the observed antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo may suggest that IFN-λ exerts a significant portion of its antiviral activity in vivo via stimulation of the immune system rather than through induction of the antiviral state.

Type III IFNs (IFN-λ/IL-28/29) are cytokines with type I IFN-like antiviral activities, which remain poorly characterized. We herein show that most cell types expressed both types I and III IFNs after TLR stimulation or virus infection, whereas the ability of cells to respond to IFN-λ was restricted to a narrow subset of cells, including plasmacytoid dendritic cells and epithelial cells. To examine the role of type III IFN in antiviral defense, we generated IL-28Rα-deficient mice. These mice were indistinguishable from wild-type mice with respect to clearance of a panel of different viruses, whereas mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR−/−) were significantly impaired. However, the strong antiviral activity evoked by treatment of mice with TLR3 or TLR9 agonists was significantly reduced in both IL-28RA−/− and IFNAR−/− mice. The type I IFN receptor system has been shown to mediate positive feedback on IFN-αβ expression, and we found that the type I IFN receptor system also mediates positive feedback on IFN-λ expression, whereas IL-28Rα signaling does not provide feedback on either type I or type III IFN expression in vivo. Finally, using bone-marrow chimeric mice we showed that TLR-activated antiviral defense requires expression of IL-28Rα only on nonhemopoietic cells. In this compartment, epithelial cells responded to IFN-λ and directly restricted virus replication. Our data suggest type III IFN to target a specific subset of cells and to contribute to the antiviral response evoked by TLRs.

Herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) are highly prevalent neurotropic viruses. While they can replicate lytically in cells of the epithelial lineage, causing lesions on mucocutaneous surfaces, HSVs also establish latent infections in neurons, which act as reservoirs of virus for subsequent reactivation events. Immunological control of HSV involves activation of innate immune pattern-recognition receptors such as TLR3, which detects double-stranded RNA and induces type I IFN expression. Humans with defects in the TLR3/IFN pathway have an elevated susceptibility to HSV infections of the CNS. However, it is not known what cell type mediates the role of TLR3 in the immunological control of HSV, and it is not known whether TLR3 sensing occurs prior to or after CNS entry. Here, we show that in mice TLR3 provides early control of HSV-2 infection immediately after entry into the CNS by mediating type I IFN responses in astrocytes. Tlr3^–/– mice were hypersusceptible to HSV-2 infection in the CNS after vaginal inoculation. HSV-2 exhibited broader neurotropism in Tlr3^–/– mice than it did in WT mice, with astrocytes being most abundantly infected. Tlr3^–/– mice did not exhibit a global defect in innate immune responses to HSV, but astrocytes were defective in HSV-induced type I IFN production. Thus, TLR3 acts in astrocytes to sense HSV-2 infection immediately after entry into the CNS, possibly preventing HSV from spreading beyond the neurons mediating entry into the CNS.

Viruses are recognized by the innate immune system through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). For instance, HSV virions and genomic DNA are recognized by TLR2 and TLR9, respectively. Although several viruses and viral components have been shown to stimulate cells through TLRs, only very few studies have defined essential roles for single TLRs in innate immune defense in vivo. This could suggest that PRRs act in concert to mount the first line of defense against virus infections. To test this hypothesis we have examined the host response of C57BL/6, TLR2^−/−, TLR9^−/−, and TLR2/9^−/− mice toward HSV-2 infection. After a systemic infection, the cytokine serum response was markedly reduced in the double knockout mice, but only partly affected in either strain of the single knockout mice. This was supported by in vitro data showing that HSV-induced cytokine expression relayed on TLR2 and TLR9 in a cytokine- and cell type-dependent manner. With respect to the cellular response to infection, we found that recruitment but not activation of NK cells was impaired in TLR2/9^−/− mice. Importantly, the viral load in the brain, but not liver, was significantly higher in the brain of TLR2/9^−/− mice whereas the viral loads in organs of single knockout mice were statistically indistinguishable from C57BL/6 mice. In the brain we found that TNF-α and the IFN-stimulated gene CXCL9 were expressed during infection and were dependent on either TLR2 or TLR9. Thus, TLR2 and TLR9 synergistically stimulate innate antiviral activities, thereby protecting against HSV infection in the brain.