Xiaodong Li

Dr. Xiaodong Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZMengmei Zhang
Mengmei Zhang
ABAlfons Buekens
Alfons Buekens
XLXiaodong Li
Xiaodong Li

8 July 2021 in Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HCHang Chen
Hang Chen
DYDingkun Yuan
Dingkun Yuan
AWAngjian Wu
Angjian Wu
XLXiaoqing Lin
Xiaoqing Lin
XLXiaodong Li
Xiaodong Li

30 January 2017 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJingwei Li
Jingwei Li
ZQZhifu Qi
Zhifu Qi
MLMin Li
Min Li
DWDongli Wu
Dongli Wu
CZChenyang Zhou
Chenyang Zhou
XLXiaodong Li
Xiaodong Li

16 July 2015 in Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZMengmei Zhang
Mengmei Zhang
ABAlfons Buekens
Alfons Buekens
XJXuguang Jiang
Xuguang Jiang
XLXiaodong Li
Xiaodong Li
This review on polyvinylchloride (PVC) and dioxins collects, collates, and compares data from selected sources on the formation of polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), or in brief dioxins, in combustion and fires. In professional spheres, the incineration of PVC as part of municipal solid waste is seldom seen as a problem, since deep flue gas cleaning is required anyhow. Conversely, with its high content of chlorine, PVC is frequently branded as a major chlorine donor and spitefully leads to substantial formation of dioxins during poorly controlled or uncontrolled combustion and open fires. Numerous still ill-documented and diverse factors of influence may affect the formation of dioxins during combustion: on the one hand PVC-compounds represent an array of materials with widely different formulations; on the other hand these may all be exposed to fires of different nature and consequences. Hence, attention should be paid to PVC with respect to the ignition and development of fires, as well as attenuating the emission of objectionable compounds, such as carbon monoxide, hydrogen chloride, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and dioxins. This review summarises available dioxin emissions data, gathers experimental and simulation studies of fires and combustion tests involving PVC, and identifies and analyses the effects of several local factors of influence, affecting the formation of dioxins during PVC combustion.

25 March 2020 in ACS Catalysis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Zheng BoZheng Bo
Zheng Bo
SYShiling Yang
Shiling Yang
JKJing Kong
Jing Kong
JZJinhui Zhu
Jinhui Zhu
YWYaolin Wang
Yaolin Wang
Xin TuXin Tu
Xin Tu
In this work, we propose a hybrid and unique process combining solar irradiation and post-plasma catalysis (PPC) for the effective oxidation of toluene over a highly active and stable MnO2/GFF (bifunctional graphene fin foam) catalyst. The bifunctional GFF, serving as both the catalyst support and light absorber, is decorated with MnO2 nanofins, forming a hierarchical fin-on-fin structure. The results show that the MnO2/GFF catalyst can effectively capture and convert renewable solar energy into heat (absorption of >95%), leading to a temperature rise (55.6 °C) of the catalyst bed under solar irradiation (1 sun, light intensity 1000 W m–2). The catalyst weight (9.8 mg) used in this work was significantly lower (10–100 times lower) than that used in previous studies (usually 100–1000 mg). Introducing solar energy into the typical PPC process via solar thermal conversion significantly enhances the conversion of toluene and CO2 selectivity by 36–63%, reaching ∼93% for toluene conversion and ∼83% for CO2 selectivity at a specific input energy of ∼350 J L–1, thus remarkably reducing the energy consumption of the plasma-catalytic gas cleaning process. The energy efficiency for toluene conversion in the solar-enhanced post-plasma catalytic (SEPPC) process reaches up to 12.7 g kWh–1, ∼57% higher than that using the PPC process without solar irradiation (8.1 g kWh–1), whereas the energy consumption of the SEPPC process is reduced by 35–52%. Moreover, the MnO2/GFF catalyst exhibits an excellent self-cleaning capability induced by solar irradiation, demonstrating a superior long-term catalytic stability of 72 h at 1 sun, significantly better than that reported in previous works. The prominent synergistic effect of solar irradiation and PPC with a synergistic capacity of ∼42% can be mainly attributed to the solar-induced thermal effect on the catalyst bed, boosting ozone decomposition (an almost triple enhancement from ∼0.18 gO3 g–1 h–1 for PPC to ∼0.52 gO3 g–1 h–1 for SEPPC) to generate more oxidative species (e.g., O radicals) and enhancing the catalytic oxidation on the catalyst surfaces, as well as the self-cleaning capacity of the catalyst at elevated temperatures driven by solar irradiation. This work opens a rational route to use abundant, renewable solar power to achieve high-performance and energy-efficient removal of volatile organic compounds.

22 September 2020 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YPYaqi Peng
Yaqi Peng
Shengyong LuShengyong Lu
Shengyong Lu
XLXiaodong Li
Xiaodong Li
JYJianhua Yan
Jianhua Yan
KCKefan Cen
Kefan Cen