Maria Cristina Schneider

Dr. Maria Cristina Schneider

Global Health, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., USA
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 March 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDeise I. Galan
Deise I. Galan
ARAmira A. Roess
Amira A. Roess
SPSimone Valéria Costa Pereira
Simone Valéria Costa Pereira
Maria Cristina SchneiderMaria Cristina Schneider
Maria Cristina Schneider
Background: Leptospirosis is one of the most widespread zoonosis in the world and Brazil has the highest number of cases in Latin America. Transmission occurs mainly through exposure to water and soil contaminated by the urine of infected animals. The goals of this study are to describe the geographic distribution, demographic characteristics and exposure factors of urban and rural cases of leptospirosis, and identify spatial clusters in urban and rural areas of Brazil. Methods/results: A retrospective epidemiological study was carried out using 16 years (2000–2015) of surveillance data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health. Cases were described by age, sex and race, and exposure factors were characterized in urban and rural areas. A spatial autocorrelation analysis was conducted using local Moran’s I to identify urban and rural clusters of disease. On average 3,810 leptospirosis cases were reported annually with higher numbers in urban areas. National urban and rural incidence rates were the same (1.9 cases/100,000 population), however, regional differences were observed. Urban incidence rates were higher in the North and Northeast regions, while rural incidence rates were higher in the Southeast and South. The main exposure factor reported in urban and rural areas was exposure to places with signs of rodents, followed by flood in urban areas and agriculture and animal farming in rural areas. Clusters of leptospirosis were identified in densely populated urban areas of the North, Southeast and South regions, while rural clusters were concentrated in of the Southern region with large agriculture and animal farming practices. Conclusions: This study highlights that leptospirosis is an important public health problem in both urban and rural areas of Brazil. The results provide decision-makers with detailed information about where disease incidence is high and can be used in the development of prevention and control strategies for priority areas and risk groups.

29 January 2021 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maria Cristina SchneiderMaria Cristina Schneider
Maria Cristina Schneider
KMKyung-duk Min
Kyung-duk Min
PNPatricia Najera
Patricia Najera
LMLucia R. Montebello
Lucia R. Montebello
TRTani Maria Ranieri
Tani Maria Ranieri
NLNísia Trindade Lima
Nísia Trindade Lima
Snakebite envenoming affects close to 2.7 million people globally every year. In Brazil, snakebites are reported to the Ministry of Health surveillance system and cases receive antivenom free of charge. There is an urgent need to identify higher risk areas for antivenom distribution, and to develop prevention activities. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the epidemiological situation of snakebite envenoming in Brazil and explore possible drivers; as well as to create a flowchart tool to support decision-makers identify higher risk areas. An ecological-type study was carried out using data by municipality (2013–2017). Study parts: 1) Create a geocoded database and perform a descriptive and cluster analysis; 2) Statistical analysis to measure the association of snakebite and possible environmental and socioeconomic drivers; 3) Develop a flowchart to support decision-makers and the application of this tool in one state (Rio Grande do Sul) as an example. An average of 27,120 snakebite cases per year were reported at the country level. Clusters of municipalities with high numbers of snakebites are mostly found in the Amazon Legal Region. The negative binomial regression model showed association with the snakebite case count: the type of major habitat, tropical or non-tropical; temperature; percentage of urbanization; precipitation; elevation; GDP per capita; a weaker relation with forest loss; and with venomous snake richness. The state where the instrument was applied reported 4,227 snakebites in the period. Most municipalities were considered as medium risk and 56/496 as high risk according to the tool created. Snakebite cases are distributed across the entire country with the highest concentration in the Legal Amazon Region. This creates a complex situation both for better understanding of the association of environmental and socioeconomic factors with snakebites and for the distribution and maintenance of antivenom to remote areas. Research into types of antivenom with a longer shelf life without the need for refrigeration is needed.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSofia Sciancalepore
Sofia Sciancalepore
Maria Cristina SchneiderMaria Cristina Schneider
Maria Cristina Schneider
JKJisoo Kim
Jisoo Kim
DGDeise I. Galan
Deise I. Galan
ARAna Riviere-Cinnamond
Ana Riviere-Cinnamond
Oropouche virus (OROV) is an emerging vector-borne arbovirus with high epidemic potential, causing illness in more than 500,000 people. Primarily contracted through its midge and mosquito vectors, OROV remains prevalent in its wild, non-human primate and sloth reservoir hosts as well. This virus is spreading across Latin America; however, the majority of cases occur in Brazil. The aim of this research is to document OROV’s presence in Brazil using the One Health approach and geospatial techniques. A scoping review of the literature (2000 to 2021) was conducted to collect reports of this disease in humans and animal species. Data were then geocoded by first and second subnational levels and species to map OROV’s spread. In total, 14 of 27 states reported OROV presence across 67 municipalities (second subnational level). However, most of the cases were in the northern region, within the tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests biome. OROV was identified in humans, four vector species, four genera of non-human primates, one sloth species, and others. Utilizing One Health was important to understand the distribution of OROV across several species and to suggest possible environmental, socioeconomic, and demographic drivers of the virus’s presence. As deforestation, climate change, and migration rates increase, further study into the spillover potential of this disease is needed.

26 April 2019
Verified
Reference Entry
Closed access
Maria Cristina SchneiderMaria Cristina Schneider
Maria Cristina Schneider
CMClaudia Munoz-Zanzi
Claudia Munoz-Zanzi
KMKyung-Duk Min
Kyung-Duk Min
SASylvain Aldighieri
Sylvain Aldighieri
The vision that everything is connected in this world is not new. However, to respond to the current challenges that the world is facing, the integrated vision that humans, animals, and the environment are linked is more important than ever. Collaboration among multiple disciplines is crucial, and this approach is fundamental to understanding the One Health concept. A transdisciplinary definition of One Health views animals, humans, and their shared settings or environment as linked and affected by the socioeconomic interest of humans and external pressures. A One Health concept calls for various disciplines to work together to provide new methods and tools for research and implementation of effective services to support the formulation of norms, regulations, and policies to the benefit of humanity, animals, and the environment for current and future generations. This will improve the understanding of health and disease processes as well as prediction, detection, prevention, and control of infectious hazards and other issues affecting health and well-being in the human-animal-ecosystem interface, contributing to sustainable development goals, and to improving equity in the world.

Maria Cristina SchneiderMaria Cristina Schneider
Maria Cristina Schneider
MVMyriam Vuckovic
Myriam Vuckovic
LPLucia Regina Montebello Pereira
Lucia Regina Montebello Pereira
CSCaroline Sarpy
Caroline Sarpy
QHQuincy Huang
Quincy Huang
RLRonir Luiz
Ronir Luiz
Animal stings are environmental hazards that threaten millions annually and cause a significant socioeconomic impact. Snakebite envenoming affects 2.7 million people globally every year, mostly the poorest and rural communities, with approximately 27,000 annual cases in Brazil. This study’s objective is to identify the most exposed racial group for snakebites in rural areas of Brazil and analyze possible differences in the outcome of an accident. A retrospective epidemiological study was conducted using a database of rural snakebite cases from Brazil’s Ministry of Health (2017). Descriptive analysis and a regression model were performed to examine the association of bad outcomes after a snakebite with several covariables. While mixed-race individuals presented the highest number of cases (61.79%), indigenous and white populations were the racial groups with the highest and lowest exposure rates (194.3 and 34.1 per 100,000 population, respectively). The fatality rate was 3.5 times higher in the indigenous population compared to the white population. In the multivariable model, the number of hours between the accident and health care received and the case classification suggested an association with a bad outcome. Snakebite is prominent in Brazil, particularly among indigenous groups. Antivenom is available in the Brazilian Health System; however, efforts need to be made for decentralization.

17 April 2025 in Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRTani Maria Ranieri
Tani Maria Ranieri
ESEduardo Viegas da Silva
Eduardo Viegas da Silva
MVMarcelo Jostmeier Vallandro
Marcelo Jostmeier Vallandro
MOMAYARA MOTA DE OLIVEIRA
MAYARA MOTA DE OLIVEIRA
RBRegina Bones Barcellos
Regina Bones Barcellos
Maria Cristina SchneiderMaria Cristina Schneider
Maria Cristina Schneider
Leptospirosis is a well-known disease that frequently occurs after floods. At the beginning of May 2024, a catastrophic flood occurred in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, affecting two million people and leading to a state of calamity. Given the State’s high pre-flood leptospirosis rates, the disease became a major concern for decision-makers. This study aimed to estimate the rise in leptospirosis cases after the flood, assess the changes in case patterns before and after the disaster, and document the response of the state health surveillance center to the outbreak. We estimated the increase during the flood period (May to July 2024) by comparing it with the same period in the previous year as baseline. During the first three months of the catastrophic event, 6273 suspected cases of leptospirosis were reported to the surveillance system, and 958 cases were confirmed. The number of confirmed cases during the flood was 10.3-fold higher than the baseline. Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient was 0.77 (p-value < 0.0001) for the association of Health Regions regarding the rank in incidence rates of confirmed cases in the flood period and the proportion of the population with households flooded. Thirty deaths (three females) were confirmed, a 6.0-fold rise compared with 2023. The state responders carried out many activities, including epidemiological surveillance and the dissemination of information. Among the challenges faced was the lack of evidence in the literature supporting recommendations for antibiotic chemoprophylaxis for rescue personnel. Another difficulty concerned performing gold-standard laboratory diagnostic tests to confirm the enormous number of suspected cases reported during this catastrophe. Despite implementing many actions to mitigate its impact, leptospirosis remained a major challenge during the event. These findings may provide valuable insights for decision-makers facing similar situations in massive climate disasters.