Liqiang Zhang

Dr. Liqiang Zhang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2022 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XXXiao Xia
Xiao Xia
LZLiqiang Zhang
Liqiang Zhang
ZLZhanyao Li
Zhanyao Li
Xueliang YuanXueliang Yuan
Xueliang Yuan
CMChunyuan Ma
Chunyuan Ma
GCGuifang Chen
Guifang Chen

28 December 2022 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXiaohan Zhou
Xiaohan Zhou
LZLiqiang Zhang
Liqiang Zhang
QCQuanwang Chen
Quanwang Chen
XXXia Xiao
Xia Xiao
TWTao Wang
Tao Wang
JLJun Li
Jun Li

17 October 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXiaohan Zhou
Xiaohan Zhou
WTWenjing Tang
Wenjing Tang
MHMinqiang He
Minqiang He
XXXia Xiao
Xia Xiao
TWTao Wang
Tao Wang
LZLiqiang Zhang
Liqiang Zhang

20 January 2024 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCShanjie Cheng
Shanjie Cheng
TWTao Wang
Tao Wang
LCLiang Chu
Liang Chu
JLJun Li
Jun Li
LZLiqiang Zhang
Liqiang Zhang

1 September 2021 in Environmental Engineering Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XXXiao Xia
Xiao Xia
LZLiqiang Zhang
Liqiang Zhang
Xueliang YuanXueliang Yuan
Xueliang Yuan
CMChunyuan Ma
Chunyuan Ma
ZSZhanlong Song
Zhanlong Song
XZXiqiang Zhao
Xiqiang Zhao
To solve the problems of difficult treatment of desulfurized gypsum and overmining of limestone, a kind of lime/gypsum flue gas desulfurization (FGD) collaborative desulfurized gypsum resource utilization process (LCS) was proposed. The system mainly includes the LCS-LFGD (lime/gypsum flue gas desulfurization system), LCS-C (desulfurized gypsum reduction calcining process), and carbon monoxide-coupled activated carbon reduction of SO2 to sulfur process (LCS-S). Taking a typical wet FGD unit of 300 MW power plant in China as an example, the limestone/gypsum flue gas desulfurization system (L-FGD) process was compared with the LCS by using the method of life cycle assessment and life cycle cost (LCC). The result shows that the overall environmental impact of the LCS is 0.2913. The environmental impacts of LCS-LFGD, LCS-C, and LCS-S were 0.1322, 0.1543, and 0.0048, respectively. Both LCS-LFGD and LCS-C are the key processes in this case study, and electricity consumption and coal gas consumption are the key substances in each key process. LCC analysis showed that although the initial investment of LCS was 4.32 × 106 USD ∼5.76 × 106 USD more compared with L-FGD, the running cost of LCS was 1.41 × 106 USD per year lower compared with L-FGD. Besides, the cost of ore mining, the quality of calcined products, and environmental protection policy will affect the financial cost of the process.

1 September 2021 in Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXiao Zhu
Xiao Zhu
ZRZhang Ran
Zhang Ran
SRSida Rong
Sida Rong
LZLiqiang Zhang
Liqiang Zhang
CMChunyuan Ma
Chunyuan Ma