Xinli Du

Xinli Du

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 December 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSean Cullen
Sean Cullen
RMRuth Mackay
Ruth Mackay
Amir Ali MohagheghiAmir Ali Mohagheghi
Amir Ali Mohagheghi
XDXinli Du
Xinli Du
The fit of a lower limb prosthetic socket is critical for user comfort and the quality of life of lower limb amputees. Sockets are conventionally produced using hand-crafted patient-based casting techniques. Modern digital techniques offer a host of advantages to the process and ultimately lead to improving the lives of amputees. However, commercially available scanning equipment required is often expensive and proprietary. Smartphone photogrammetry could offer a low cost alternative, but there is no widely accepted imaging technique for prosthetic socket digitisation. Therefore, this paper aims to determine an optimal imaging technique for whole socket photogrammetry and evaluate the resultant scan measurement accuracy. A 3D printed transtibial socket was produced to create digital and physical twins, as reference models. The printed socket was photographed from 360 positions and simplified genetic algorithms were used to design a series of experiments, whereby a collection of photos were processed using Autodesk ReCap. The most fit technique was used to assess accuracy. The accuracy of the socket wall volume, surface area and height were 61.63%, 99.61% and 99.90%, respectively, when compared to the digital reference model. The scanned model had a wall thickness ranging from 2.075 mm at the top to 7.758 mm towards the base of the socket, compared to a consistent thickness of 2.025 mm in the control model. The technique selected did not show sufficient accuracy for clinical application due to the degradation of accuracy nearer to the base of the socket interior. However, using an internal wall thickness estimation, scans may be of sufficient accuracy for clinical use; assuming a uniform wall thickness.

1 December 2021 in Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NHNauman Hafeez
Nauman Hafeez
XDXinli Du
Xinli Du
NBNikolaos Boulgouris
Nikolaos Boulgouris
PBPhilip Begg
Philip Begg
RIRichard Irving
Richard Irving
GTGuillaume Tourrel
Guillaume Tourrel

19 October 2012 in The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XDXinli Du
Xinli Du
MAMasoud Z Assadi
Masoud Z Assadi
FJFelicity Jowitt
Felicity Jowitt
PBPeter N Brett
Peter N Brett
SHScott Henshaw
Scott Henshaw
ARAndrew P Reid
Andrew P Reid

2 July 2025 in Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OAOneeba Ahmed
Oneeba Ahmed
MWMingfeng Wang
Mingfeng Wang
Bin ZhangBin Zhang
Bin Zhang
RIRichard Irving
Richard Irving
PBPhilip Anthony Begg
Philip Anthony Begg
XDXinli Du
Xinli Du
Sensorineural hearing loss occurs when cochlear hair cells fail to convert mechanical sound waves into electrical signals transmitted via the auditory nerve. Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing by directly stimulating the auditory nerve with electrical impulses, often while preserving residual hearing. Over the past two decades, robotic-assisted techniques in otologic surgery have gained prominence for improving precision and safety. Robotic systems support critical procedures such as mastoidectomy, cochleostomy drilling, and electrode array (EA) insertion. These technologies aim to minimize trauma and enhance hearing preservation. Despite the outpatient nature of most CI surgeries, surgeons still face challenges, including anatomical complexity, imaging demands, and rising costs. Robotic systems help address these issues by streamlining workflows, reducing variability, and improving electrode placement accuracy. This review evaluates robotic systems developed for cochlear implantation, focusing on their design, surgical integration, and clinical outcomes. This review concludes that robotic systems offer low insertion speed, which leads to reduced insertion forces and lower intracochlear pressure. However, their impact on trauma, long-term hearing preservation, and speech outcome remains uncertain. Further research is needed to assess clinical durability, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes.

7 July 2014 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPeter Brett
Peter Brett
XDXinli Du
Xinli Du
MZMasoud Zoka-Assadi
Masoud Zoka-Assadi
CCChris Coulson
Chris Coulson
ARAndrew Reid
Andrew Reid
DPDavid Proops
David Proops
The concept of a hand guided robotic drill has been inspired by an automated, arm supported robotic drill recently applied in clinical practice to produce cochleostomies without penetrating the endosteum ready for inserting cochlear electrodes. The smart tactile sensing scheme within the drill enables precise control of the state of interaction between tissues and tools in real-time. This paper reports development studies of the hand guided robotic drill where the same consistent outcomes, augmentation of surgeon control and skill, and similar reduction of induced disturbances on the hearing organ are achieved. The device operates with differing presentation of tissues resulting from variation in anatomy and demonstrates the ability to control or avoid penetration of tissue layers as required and to respond to intended rather than involuntary motion of the surgeon operator. The advantage of hand guided over an arm supported system is that it offers flexibility in adjusting the drilling trajectory. This can be important to initiate cutting on a hard convex tissue surface without slipping and then to proceed on the desired trajectory after cutting has commenced. The results for trials on phantoms show that drill unit compliance is an important factor in the design.

26 June 2013 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMasoud Z Assadi
Masoud Z Assadi
XDXinli Du
Xinli Du
JDJames Dalton
James Dalton
SHScott Henshaw
Scott Henshaw
CCChris J Coulson
Chris J Coulson
PBPeter N Brett
Peter N Brett
During cochlear implantation, hearing preservation is a concern. Minimizing disturbances to the cochlea and protection of the underlying endosteal membrane during the formation of a cochleostomy are considered important factors. The robotic micro-drill system tested in this article is the first example of an autonomous surgical drill successfully producing a cochleostomy, which keeps the underlying endosteal membrane intact. This study compares induced disturbances within the cochlea during formation of cochleostomy using the robotic micro-drill with that of conventional manual drilling. The disturbance of the endosteal membrane is measured using a Microscope Scanning Vibrometer at a third window, produced in the cochlea. Results show that the highest velocity amplitude measured was associated with manual drilling technique. The robotic micro-drill technique produced only about 1% of the peak velocity amplitude seen in manual drilling and exhibited much more uniform behaviour, while keeping the underlying membrane intact. The technique applied when using the robotic drill could be a major step in reducing the trauma to the cochlea, by reducing disturbance levels.