Melissa Raspa

Dr. Melissa Raspa

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 June 2008 in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDonald Bailey
Donald Bailey
MRMelissa Raspa
Melissa Raspa
MOMurrey Olmsted
Murrey Olmsted
DHDavid B. Holiday
David B. Holiday

1 August 2009 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDonald Bailey
Donald Bailey
MRMelissa Raspa
Melissa Raspa
EBEllen Bishop
Ellen Bishop
DHDavid Holiday
David Holiday
OBJECTIVE: To determine recent trends in the diagnosis of children with fragile X syndrome (FXS) and identify factors associated with the timing of diagnosis.

1 November 2010 in American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EBElizabeth Berry-Kravis
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
MRMelissa Raspa
Melissa Raspa
LLLisa Loggin-Hester
Lisa Loggin-Hester
EBEllen Bishop
Ellen Bishop
DHDavid Holiday
David Holiday
DBDonald B. Bailey
Donald B. Bailey
A national survey of caregivers of individuals with fragile X syndrome addressed characteristics of epilepsy and co-occurring conditions. Of the 1,394 individuals (1,090 males and 304 females) with the full mutation, 14% of males and 6% of females reported seizures. Seizures were more often partial, began between ages 4 and 10 years, and were infrequent and easily treated. Similar characteristics and patterns were seen in medical chart review data from a large clinic cohort of patients with fragile X syndrome. National survey data showed that autism was significantly associated with seizures as a co-occurring condition. Although seizures in fragile X syndrome are typically not severe and easily treated with medications, they appear to be associated with developmental–behavioral comorbidity that impacts function.

25 February 2021 in Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MRMelissa Raspa
Melissa Raspa
RMRebecca Moultrie
Rebecca Moultrie
DTDanielle Toth
Danielle Toth
SHSaira Naim Haque
Saira Naim Haque
Background: Advances in diagnostics testing and treatment of genetic conditions have led to increased demand for genetic services in the United States. At the same time, there is a shortage of genetic services professionals. Thus, understanding the models of service delivery currently in use can help increase access and improve outcomes for individuals identified with genetic conditions. Objective: This review aims to provide an overview of barriers and facilitators to genetic service delivery models to inform future service delivery. Methods: We conducted a scoping literature review of the evidence to more fully understand barriers and facilitators around the provision of genetic services. Results: There were a number of challenges identified, including the limited number of genetics specialists, wait time for appointments, delivery of services by nongenetics providers, reimbursement, and licensure. The ways to address these challenges include the use of health information technology such as telehealth, group genetic counseling, provider-to-provider education, partnership models, and training; expanding genetic provider types; and embedding genetic counselors in clinical settings. Conclusions: The literature review highlighted the need to expand access to genetic services. Ways to expand services include telehealth, technical assistance, and changing staffing models. In addition, using technology to improve knowledge among related professionals can help expand access.

1 May 2010 in SLEEP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRebecca Kronk
Rebecca Kronk
EBEllen E. Bishop
Ellen E. Bishop
MRMelissa Raspa
Melissa Raspa
JBJulie O. Bickel
Julie O. Bickel
DMDaniel A. Mandel
Daniel A. Mandel
DBDonald B. Bailey
Donald B. Bailey
This study reports on current child sleep difficulties reported by parents of children with Fragile X syndrome (FXS). We address prevalence and type of sleep problems (e.g., difficulty falling asleep, frequent awakenings); type and effectiveness of medical and behavioral treatments (e.g., medication, surgery, environmental changes); and explore specific child and family characteristics (e.g., child age, child gender, co-occurring conditions) as possible predictors of child sleep difficulties. This study is part of a larger survey addressing needs of families with children with FXS. This article focuses on the families who responded to the survey sleep questions, had one or more children with the full mutation FXS, and who reside in the United States. The mean age for male and female children in this group was 15 years and 16 years respectively (N = 1,295). Parents reported that 32% of the children with FXS currently experience sleep difficulties; 84% of those children are reported to have ≥ 2 current sleep problems. Problems falling asleep and frequent night awakenings were the most frequently reported difficulties; 47% of males and 40% of females received ≥1 medication to help with sleep. Children with more problematic health or behavioral characteristics had a higher likelihood of having current sleep problems. Our survey provides the most representative sample to date of sleep problems in children with FXS or any other neurodevelopmental disability. This large scale survey establishes a foundation for the prevalence of sleep disorders in children with FXS.

15 December 2015 in Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDonald Bailey
Donald Bailey
EBElizabeth M. NA Berry-Kravis
Elizabeth M. NA Berry-Kravis
AWAnne Wheeler
Anne Wheeler
MRMelissa Raspa
Melissa Raspa
FMFlorence Merrien
Florence Merrien
GAGeorge Apostol
George Apostol
A phase II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study and subsequent open-label extension study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mavoglurant (AFQ056), a selective metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype-5 antagonist, in treating behavioral symptoms in adolescent patients with fragile X syndrome (FXS). A novel method was applied to analyze changes in symptom domains in patients with FXS using the narratives associated with the clinician-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. In the core study, patients were randomized to receive mavoglurant (25, 50, or 100 mg BID) or placebo over 12 weeks. In the extension, patients received 100 mg BID mavoglurant (or the highest tolerated dose) for up to 32 months. Global improvement, as a measure of treatment response, was assessed using the CGI-I scale. Investigators assigning CGI-I scores of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 6 (much worse), or 7 (very much worse) were provided a standard narrative template to collect further information about the changes observed in patients. Investigator feedback was coded and clustered into categories of improvement or worsening to identify potential areas of improvement with mavoglurant. Treatment effect in each category was characterized using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test. A total of 134 and 103 patients had reached 2 weeks or more of core and extension study treatment, respectively, by the pre-assigned cutoff date for investigator feedback. In the core study, 34 CGI-I scores of 1 or 2 were reported in 28 patients; one patient scored 6. Analysis of the CGI-I narratives did not indicate greater treatment response in patients receiving mavoglurant compared with placebo in any specific improvement domain. There were 54 CGI-I scores of 1 or 2 in 47 patients in the extension study. The most frequently reported categories of improvement were behavior and mood (79.3 and 76.6 % in core and extension studies, respectively), engagement (75.9 and 78.7 %), and communication (69.0 and 61.7 %). A method was established to capture and categorize FXS symptoms using CGI-I narratives. Although this method did not show benefit of drug over placebo, narratives from investigators were mostly based on parental report and thus do not represent a completely objective alternative assessment. The studies described are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with clinical trial identifier numbers NCT01357239 and NCT01433354 .