Gregorio Sgrigna

Dr. Gregorio Sgrigna

1. Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET) National Research Council (CNR), 05010 Porano (TR), Italy;
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2013 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra
Silvano FaresSilvano Fares
Silvano Fares
Fausto ManesFausto Manes
Fausto Manes
AMA. Morani
A. Morani
Gregorio SgrignaGregorio Sgrigna
Gregorio Sgrigna
FLFrancesco Loreto
Francesco Loreto

22 March 2019 in Journal of Forestry Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSamson Roeland
Samson Roeland
MMMarco Moretti
Marco Moretti
JAJorge Humberto Amorim
Jorge Humberto Amorim
Cristina BranquinhoCristina Branquinho
Cristina Branquinho
SFSilvano Fares
Silvano Fares
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra
As a Nature-Based Solution, urban forests deliver a number of environmental ecosystem services (EESs). To quantify these EESs, well-defined, reliable, quantifiable and stable indicators are needed. With literature analysis and expert knowledge gathered within COST Action FP1204 GreenInUrbs, we proposed a classification of urban forest EESs into three categories: (A) regulation of air, water, soil and climate; (B) provisioning of habitat quality; and (C) provisioning of other goods and services. Each category is divided into EES types: (a) amelioration of air quality; restoration of soil and water; amelioration of the microclimate; removal of CO2 from the air; (b) provision of habitat for biodiversity; support for resilient urban ecosystems; provision of genetic diversity; and (c) provision of energy and nutrients; provision of grey infrastructure resilience. Each EES type provides one or more benefits. For each of these 12 benefits, we propose a set of indicators to be used when analyzing the impacts on the identified EESs. Around half of the 36 indicators are relevant to more than one single benefit, which highlights complex interrelationships. The indicators of wider applicability are tree and stand characteristics, followed by leaf physical traits and tree species composition. This knowledge is needed for the optimization of the EESs delivered by urban forests, now and in the future.

27 January 2017 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Chiara BaldacchiniChiara Baldacchini
Chiara Baldacchini
ACAna Castanheiro
Ana Castanheiro
NMNairuhi Maghakyan
Nairuhi Maghakyan
Gregorio SgrignaGregorio Sgrigna
Gregorio Sgrigna
JVJolien Verhelst
Jolien Verhelst
RSRoeland Samson
Roeland Samson

1 April 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gregorio SgrignaGregorio Sgrigna
Gregorio Sgrigna
Chiara BaldacchiniChiara Baldacchini
Chiara Baldacchini
RER. Esposito
R. Esposito
RCRoberto Calandrelli
Roberto Calandrelli
Abhishek TiwaryAbhishek Tiwary
Abhishek Tiwary
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra

4 May 2019 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Chiara BaldacchiniChiara Baldacchini
Chiara Baldacchini
Gregorio SgrignaGregorio Sgrigna
Gregorio Sgrigna
WCWoody Clarke
Woody Clarke
Matthew TallisMatthew Tallis
Matthew Tallis
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra

1 January 2016 in Journal of Environmental Quality
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra
AMArianna Morani
Arianna Morani
Gregorio SgrignaGregorio Sgrigna
Gregorio Sgrigna
SGSara Di Giovanni
Sara Di Giovanni
VMValerio Muzzini
Valerio Muzzini
Silvano FaresSilvano Fares
Silvano Fares