Chen Yang

Prof. Dr. Chen Yang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 April 2020 in International Journal of Energy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPan Li
Pan Li
Chen YangChen Yang
Chen Yang
LSLi Sun
Li Sun
JXJinyao Xiang
Jinyao Xiang
XWXiankui Wen
Xiankui Wen
TDTongtian Deng
Tongtian Deng

24 November 2015 in Chemical Engineering & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LTLing Jun Tan
Ling Jun Tan
Chen YangChen Yang
Chen Yang
NZNana Zhou
Nana Zhou

8 April 2023 in Computers & Chemical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Chen YangChen Yang
Chen Yang
TZTao Zhang
Tao Zhang
LSLi Sun
Li Sun
SHShanglong Huang
Shanglong Huang
ZZZonglong Zhang
Zonglong Zhang

12 July 2021 in International Journal of Energy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HCHao Chen
Hao Chen
Chen YangChen Yang
Chen Yang
BZBiao Zhang
Biao Zhang
NZNana Zhou
Nana Zhou
NHNor Farida Harun
Nor Farida Harun
DTDavid Tucker
David Tucker

30 June 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HWhaochuang wu
haochuang wu
Chen YangChen Yang
Chen Yang
ZZZonglong Zhang
Zonglong Zhang
QZQiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang
The efficient use of renewable energy is receiving more and more attention in the context of “carbon neutrality” and “carbon peaking”. For a long time, biomass has been used less efficiently as a renewable energy source, but with the development of fluidized biomass gasification technology, it can play an increasing role in industrial production. A fluidized bed biomass gasifier has a strong nonstationary process due to its complex energy–mass exchange, and analysis of its complex reaction process and products has relied on experiments for a long time. This paper uses a Euler–Euler two-fluid model to establish a three-dimensional CFD model of the fluidized bed biomass gasifier, on which factors affecting syngas generation are analyzed. The simulation shows that increasing the initial bed temperature can effectively improve syngas production, while increasing the air equivalent is not beneficial for syngas production.

22 October 2013 in Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LTLing Jun Tan
Ling Jun Tan
Chen YangChen Yang
Chen Yang
NZNana Zhou
Nana Zhou
A hybrid system that combines a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) with a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is presented in this paper. The SOFC stack acts as both an electricity producer and the fuel reformer for the PEMFC stack to generate additional power. A thermoeconomic model for the design optimization of a 220 kW SOFC-PEMFC hybrid system is developed in this work. Optimization of two objectives, i.e., the life cycle cost and the net electrical efficiency, are considered individually to find the optimum system configuration and component designs. Then, a multiparameter sensitivity analysis is performed to estimate the relative importance of the decision variables on the objectives. The optimization results indicate that the life cycle cost of the hybrid system is 3800–5,600 $/kW, and the maximum net electrical efficiency can reach around 63%, which is higher than an SOFC-only system, a reformer-PEMFC system, and an SOFC-gas turbine (GT) system with a similar output power. The sensitivity analysis shows that minimizing the size of the SOFC is most crucial to the system cost optimization. The hydrogen utilization factor in the SOFC is found to be sensitive to the net electrical efficiency.