Anna Staniszewska

Dr. Anna Staniszewska

Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2011 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PKPeter A. Kreuzaler
Peter A. Kreuzaler
ASAnna Staniszewska
Anna Staniszewska
WLWenjing Li
Wenjing Li
NONader Omidvar
Nader Omidvar
BKBlandine Kedjouar
Blandine Kedjouar
CWChristine J. Watson
Christine J. Watson

5 August 2022 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GIGiuditta Illuzzi
Giuditta Illuzzi
ASAnna Staniszewska
Anna Staniszewska
SGSonja J. Gill
Sonja J. Gill
APAndy Pike
Andy Pike
LMLisa McWilliams
Lisa McWilliams
ELElisabetta Leo
Elisabetta Leo
Purpose: We hypothesized that inhibition and trapping of PARP1 alone would be sufficient to achieve antitumor activity. In particular, we aimed to achieve selectivity over PARP2, which has been shown to play a role in the survival of hematopoietic/stem progenitor cells in animal models. We developed AZD5305 with the aim of achieving improved clinical efficacy and wider therapeutic window. This next-generation PARP inhibitor (PARPi) could provide a paradigm shift in clinical outcomes achieved by first-generation PARPi, particularly in combination. Experimental Design: AZD5305 was tested in vitro for PARylation inhibition, PARP-DNA trapping, and antiproliferative abilities. In vivo efficacy was determined in mouse xenograft and PDX models. The potential for hematologic toxicity was evaluated in rat models, as monotherapy and combination. Results: AZD5305 is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of PARP1 with 500-fold selectivity for PARP1 over PARP2. AZD5305 inhibits growth in cells with deficiencies in DNA repair, with minimal/no effects in other cells. Unlike first-generation PARPi, AZD5305 has minimal effects on hematologic parameters in a rat pre-clinical model at predicted clinically efficacious exposures. Animal models treated with AZD5305 at doses ≥0.1 mg/kg once daily achieved greater depth of tumor regression compared to olaparib 100 mg/kg once daily, and longer duration of response. Conclusions: AZD5305 potently and selectively inhibits PARP1 resulting in excellent antiproliferative activity and unprecedented selectivity for DNA repair deficient versus proficient cells. These data confirm the hypothesis that targeting only PARP1 can retain the therapeutic benefit of nonselective PARPi, while reducing potential for hematotoxicity. AZD5305 is currently in phase I trials (NCT04644068).

14 June 2017 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SRSarah J. Ross
Sarah J. Ross
ARAlexey S. Revenko
Alexey S. Revenko
LHLyndsey L. Hanson
Lyndsey L. Hanson
RERebecca Ellston
Rebecca Ellston
ASAnna Staniszewska
Anna Staniszewska
AMA. Robert Macleod
A. Robert Macleod
Activating mutations in KRAS underlie the pathogenesis of up to 20% of human tumors, and KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated genes in cancer. Developing therapeutics to block KRAS activity has proven difficult, and no direct inhibitor of KRAS function has entered clinical trials. We describe the preclinical evaluation of AZD4785, a high-affinity constrained ethyl–containing therapeutic antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting KRAS mRNA. AZD4785 potently and selectively depleted cellular KRAS mRNA and protein, resulting in inhibition of downstream effector pathways and antiproliferative effects selectively in KRAS mutant cells. AZD4785-mediated depletion of KRAS was not associated with feedback activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which is seen with RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitors. Systemic delivery of AZD4785 to mice bearing KRAS mutant non–small cell lung cancer cell line xenografts or patient-derived xenografts resulted in inhibition of KRAS expression in tumors and antitumor activity. The safety of this approach was demonstrated in mice and monkeys with KRAS ASOs that produced robust target knockdown in a broad set of tissues without any adverse effects. Together, these data suggest that AZD4785 is an attractive therapeutic for the treatment of KRAS-driven human cancers and warrants further development.

30 April 2018 in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMChrysiis Michaloglou
Chrysiis Michaloglou
CCClaire Crafter
Claire Crafter
RSRasmus Siersbaek
Rasmus Siersbaek
ODOona Delpuech
Oona Delpuech
JCJon O. Curwen
Jon O. Curwen
SCSabina C. Cosulich
Sabina C. Cosulich
The cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)–retinoblastoma (RB)–E2F pathway plays a critical role in the control of cell cycle in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6 have shown promise in this tumor type in combination with hormonal therapies, reflecting the particular dependence of this subtype of cancer on cyclin D1 and E2F transcription factors. mTOR inhibitors have also shown potential in clinical trials in this disease setting. Recent data have suggested cooperation between the PI3K/mTOR pathway and CDK4/6 inhibition in preventing early adaptation and eliciting growth arrest, but the mechanisms of the interplay between these pathways have not been fully elucidated. Here we show that profound and durable inhibition of ER+ breast cancer growth is likely to require multiple hits on E2F-mediated transcription. We demonstrate that inhibition of mTORC1/2 does not affect ER function directly, but does cause a decrease in cyclin D1 protein, RB phosphorylation, and E2F-mediated transcription. Combination of an mTORC1/2 inhibitor with a CDK4/6 inhibitor results in more profound effects on E2F-dependent transcription, which translates into more durable growth arrest and a delay in the onset of resistance. Combined inhibition of mTORC1/2, CDK4/6, and ER delivers even more profound and durable regressions in breast cancer cell lines and xenografts. Furthermore, we show that CDK4/6 inhibitor–resistant cell lines reactivate the CDK–RB–E2F pathway, but remain sensitive to mTORC1/2 inhibition, suggesting that mTORC1/2 inhibitors may represent an option for patients that have relapsed on CDK4/6 therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 908–20. ©2018 AACR.

1 April 2018 in Patient Preference and Adherence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMarta Dąbrowska-Bender
Marta Dąbrowska-Bender
GDGrażyna Dykowska
Grażyna Dykowska
WŻWioletta Żuk
Wioletta Żuk
MMMagdalena Milewska
Magdalena Milewska
ASAnna Staniszewska
Anna Staniszewska
Aim: The aim of the study was the subjective assessment of the quality of life (QoL) of 140 patients treated with dialysis (peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis). Background: Chronic kidney disease and the methods of its treatment play an important part in shaping the QoL of patients receiving dialysis. As a result, kidney failure causes many limitations in patients’ physical, mental, and social activities. Methods: The instrument to measure the QoL was the authors’ own questionnaire made on the basis of Kidney Disease and Quality of Life Short Form version 1.2 (KDQOL – SF 1.2) and their selection of areas influencing the perceived QoL of chronically ill patients. Results: The research showed that patients receiving peritoneal dialysis assessed their QoL in its different dimensions as much higher than patients receiving hemodialysis. The parameter having the biggest negative impact on the QoL of patients receiving hemodialysis was an impeded possibility to continue work or studies and a change of life plans. The will to live was more highly assessed by patients receiving peritoneal dialysis as compared to patients receiving hemodialysis. Conclusion: In order to improve the functioning of hemodialysis patients in a manner most similar to healthy persons, the renal replacement therapy should consider patients’ individual needs and expectations, ie, guarantee flexible hours of work or study and of receiving dialysis. In addition, patients treated with hemodialysis should receive psychological care, in particular those demonstrating emotional problems, in order to achieve better results in therapy and improve their QoL.

28 November 2019 in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMolly Taylor
Molly Taylor
AHAdina M. Hughes
Adina M. Hughes
JWJosephine Walton
Josephine Walton
ACAnna M. L. Coenen-Stass
Anna M. L. Coenen-Stass
LMLukasz Magiera
Lukasz Magiera
EHElizabeth L. Hardaker
Elizabeth L. Hardaker
The ability to modulate immune-inhibitory pathways using checkpoint blockade antibodies such as αPD-1, αPD-L1, and αCTLA-4 represents a significant breakthrough in cancer therapy in recent years. This has driven interest in identifying small-molecule-immunotherapy combinations to increase the proportion of responses. Murine syngeneic models, which have a functional immune system, represent an essential tool for pre-clinical evaluation of new immunotherapies. However, immune response varies widely between models and the translational relevance of each model is not fully understood, making selection of an appropriate pre-clinical model for drug target validation challenging. Using flow cytometry, O-link protein analysis, RT-PCR, and RNAseq we have characterized kinetic changes in immune-cell populations over the course of tumor development in commonly used syngeneic models. This longitudinal profiling of syngeneic models enables pharmacodynamic time point selection within each model, dependent on the immune population of interest. Additionally, we have characterized the changes in immune populations in each of these models after treatment with the combination of α-PD-L1 and α-CTLA-4 antibodies, enabling benchmarking to known immune modulating treatments within each model. Taken together, this dataset will provide a framework for characterization and enable the selection of the optimal models for immunotherapy combinations and generate potential biomarkers for clinical evaluation in identifying responders and non-responders to immunotherapy combinations.