Evidence suggests that community dwelling older adults (CDOA) are at risk for dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). Dysphagia is often unidentified until related morbidities like under nutrition or pneumonia occur. These cases of unidentified dysphagia, prior to any clinical intervention, may be termed ‘pre-clinical dysphagia’. Identifying pre-clinical dysphagia is challenged by the lack of validated tools appropriate for CDOA. This study addresses preliminary development of a novel patient reported outcome (PRO) screening tool for pre-clinical dysphagia. Initially, 34 questions were developed from literature review and expert opinion. Following pilot testing (n = 53), the questionnaire was revised and tested on 335 additional CDOA. Face validity, content validity, item analysis, reliability (internal consistency), and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis) measures were completed. Psychometric validation resulted in a 17-question PRO tool. Construct analysis identified a three-factor model that explained 67.345% of the variance. Emergent factors represented swallowing effort, physical function, and cognitive function. The results revealed strong construct validity and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90). A novel, simple PRO incorporating multiple function domains associated with aging demonstrated strong preliminary psychometric properties. This tool is more comprehensive and aging-focused than existing dysphagia screening tools. Inclusion of multiple domains may be key in early identification of pre-clinical dysphagia.

Purpose: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) impacts bulbar and respiratory musculature, which may contribute to impaired swallow function (dysphagia) and respiratory–swallow coordination. The purpose of this pilot study was to examine if respiratory–swallow coordination in individuals with ALS was perturbed compared to healthy controls. We further explored relationships between measures of respiratory function and self-reported swallowing outcomes on respiratory–swallow coordination.Method: We employed a cross-sectional design with eight participants with ALS and eight age- and sex-matched healthy participants. Respiratory inductance plethysmography and a nasal cannula were used to capture respiratory–swallow phase patterns during a standardized clinical swallow examination. The advantageous respiratory–swallow phase pattern was defined if exhalation surrounded the swallow (E–E). Spirometry was used to capture indices of respiratory function (forced vital capacity % predicted, peak cough flow [PCF]). Validated questionnaires were used to collect information regarding ALS-related bulbar functional status and swallowing-related concerns.Results: Compared to the matched healthy cohort, individuals with ALS demonstrated higher rates of non–E-E respiratory–swallow phase patterning and worse bulbar/swallow dysfunction. Group (ALS), swallow tasks, and PCF were significantly associated with respiratory–swallow phase pattern.Conclusions: These preliminary findings support altered respiratory–swallow phase patterning in ALS. Future work should employ an instrumental assessment to quantify swallowing physiology and elucidate the relationship between perturbed respiratory–swallow coordination and swallowing function.

Patients with laryngeal disorders often exhibit changes to cough function contributing to aspiration episodes. Two primary cough variables (peak cough flow: PCF and compression phase duration: CPD) were examined within a biomechanical model to determine their impact on characteristics that impact airway compromise. Computational study A Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technique was used to simulate fluid flow within an upper airway model reconstructed from patient CT images. The model utilized a finite-volume numerical scheme to simulate cough-induced airflow, allowing for turbulent particle interaction, collision, and break-up. Liquid penetrants at 8 anatomical release locations were tracked during the simulated cough. Cough flow velocity was computed for a base case and four simulated cases. Airway clearance was evaluated through assessment of the fate of particles in the airway following simulated cough. Peak-expiratory phase resulted in very high airway velocities for all simulated cases modelled. The highest velocity predicted was 49.96 m/s, 88 m/s, and 117 m/s for Cases 1 and 3, Base case, and Cases 2 and 4 respectively. In the base case, 25% of the penetrants cleared the laryngeal airway. The highest percentage (50%) of penetrants clearing the laryngeal airway are observed in Case 2 (with −40% CPD, +40% PCF), while only 12.5% cleared in Case 3 (with +40% CPD, −40% PCF). The proportion that cleared in Cases 1 and 4 was 37.5%. Airway modelling may be beneficial to the study of aspiration in patients with impaired cough function including those with upper airway and neurological diseases. It can be used to enhance understanding of cough flow dynamics within the airway and to inform strategies for treatment with “cough-assist devices” or devices to improve cough strength. N/A.