Håvard Jostein Haugen

Prof. Håvard Jostein Haugen

Department of Biomaterials, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2019 in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Håvard Jostein HaugenHåvard Jostein Haugen
Håvard Jostein Haugen
SLStåle Petter Lyngstadaas
Ståle Petter Lyngstadaas
Filippo RossiFilippo Rossi
Filippo Rossi
GPGiuseppe Perale
Giuseppe Perale

5 March 2008 in Physical Review B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Håvard Jostein HaugenHåvard Jostein Haugen
Håvard Jostein Haugen
DHDaniel Huertas-Hernando
Daniel Huertas-Hernando
ABArne Brataas
Arne Brataas
Ferromagnetic insulators deposited on graphene can induce ferromagnetic correlations in graphene. We estimate that induced exchange splittings Δ∼5meV can be achieved by, e.g., using the magnetic insulator EuO. We study the effect of the induced spin splittings on the graphene transport properties. The exchange splittings in proximity-induced ferromagnetic graphene can be determined from the transmission resonances in the linear response conductance or, independently, by magnetoresistance measurements in a spin-valve device. The spin polarization of the current near the Dirac point increases with the length of the barrier, so that long systems are required to determine Δ experimentally.

9 July 2020 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMaryam Rahmati
Maryam Rahmati
ESEduardo Silva
Eduardo Silva
JRJanne Reseland
Janne Reseland
CHCatherine A. Heyward
Catherine A. Heyward
Håvard Jostein HaugenHåvard Jostein Haugen
Håvard Jostein Haugen
Biomedical scientists use chemistry-driven processes found in nature as an inspiration to design biomaterials as promising diagnostic tools, therapeutic solutions, or tissue substitutes.

18 June 2019 in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mariano SanzMariano Sanz
Mariano Sanz
CDChrister Dahlin
Christer Dahlin
DADanae Apatzidou
Danae Apatzidou
ZAZvi Artzi
Zvi Artzi
DBDarko Bozic
Darko Bozic
HSHenning Schliephake
Henning Schliephake
Background and Aims: To review the regenerative technologies used in bone regeneration: bone grafts, barrier membranes, bioactive factors and cell therapies.Material and Methods: Four background review publications served to elaborate this consensus report.Results and Conclusions: Biomaterials used as bone grafts must meet specific requirements: biocompatibility, porosity, osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity, surface properties, biodegradability, mechanical properties, angiogenicity, handling and manufacturing processes. Currently used biomaterials have demonstrated advantages and limitations based on the fulfilment of these requirements. Similarly, membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) must fulfil specific properties and potential biological mechanisms to improve their clinical applicability. Pre‐clinical and clinical studies have evaluated the added effect of bone morphogenetic proteins (mainly BMP‐2) and autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) when used as bioactive agents to enhance bone regeneration. Three main approaches using cell therapies to enhance bone regeneration have been evaluated: (a) “minimally manipulated” whole tissue fractions; (b) ex vivo expanded “uncommitted” stem/progenitor cells; and (c) ex vivo expanded “committed” bone‐/periosteum‐derived cells. Based on the evidence from clinical trials, transplantation of cells, most commonly whole bone marrow aspirates (BMA) or bone marrow aspirate concentrations (BMAC), in combination with biomaterial scaffolds has demonstrated an additional effect in sinus augmentation and horizontal ridge augmentation, and comparable bone regeneration to autogenous bone in alveolar cleft repair.

1 February 2009 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSébastien F. Lamolle
Sébastien F. Lamolle
Marta MonjoMarta Monjo
Marta Monjo
MRMarina Rubert
Marina Rubert
Håvard Jostein HaugenHåvard Jostein Haugen
Håvard Jostein Haugen
SLStåle P. Lyngstadaas
Ståle P. Lyngstadaas
JEJan E. Ellingsen
Jan E. Ellingsen

1 January 2023 in Journal of Tissue Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
QMQianli Ma
Qianli Ma
ZMZahra Miri
Zahra Miri
Håvard Jostein HaugenHåvard Jostein Haugen
Håvard Jostein Haugen
AMAmirhossein Moghanian
Amirhossein Moghanian
DLDagnjia Loca
Dagnjia Loca
In 1892, J.L. Wolff proposed that bone could respond to mechanical and biophysical stimuli as a dynamic organ. This theory presents a unique opportunity for investigations on bone and its potential to aid in tissue repair. Routine activities such as exercise or machinery application can exert mechanical loads on bone. Previous research has demonstrated that mechanical loading can affect the differentiation and development of mesenchymal tissue. However, the extent to which mechanical stimulation can help repair or generate bone tissue and the related mechanisms remain unclear. Four key cell types in bone tissue, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, bone lining cells, and osteocytes, play critical roles in responding to mechanical stimuli, while other cell lineages such as myocytes, platelets, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and chondrocytes also exhibit mechanosensitivity. Mechanical loading can regulate the biological functions of bone tissue through the mechanosensor of bone cells intraosseously, making it a potential target for fracture healing and bone regeneration. This review aims to clarify these issues and explain bone remodeling, structure dynamics, and mechano-transduction processes in response to mechanical loading. Loading of different magnitudes, frequencies, and types, such as dynamic versus static loads, are analyzed to determine the effects of mechanical stimulation on bone tissue structure and cellular function. Finally, the importance of vascularization in nutrient supply for bone healing and regeneration was further discussed.