Francesco Cicone

Dr. Francesco Cicone

Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2016 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giuseppe MinnitiGiuseppe Minniti
Giuseppe Minniti
CSClaudia Scaringi
Claudia Scaringi
SPSergio Paolini
Sergio Paolini
GLGaetano Lanzetta
Gaetano Lanzetta
ARAndrea Romano
Andrea Romano
VEVincenzo Esposito
Vincenzo Esposito

2 January 2024 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANathalie L. Albert
Nathalie L. Albert
NGNorbert Galldiks
Norbert Galldiks
BEBenjamin M. Ellingson
Benjamin M. Ellingson
MBMartin J. Van Den Bent
Martin J. Van Den Bent
SCSusan M Chang
Susan M Chang
MPMatthias Preusser
Matthias Preusser

15 August 2014 in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Francesco CiconeFrancesco Cicone
Francesco Cicone
Giuseppe MinnitiGiuseppe Minniti
Giuseppe Minniti
ARAndrea Romano
Andrea Romano
APAnnalisa Papa
Annalisa Papa
CSClaudia Scaringi
Claudia Scaringi
FSFrancesco Scopinaro
Francesco Scopinaro

4 December 2017 in EJNMMI Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKatarina Sjögreen Gleisner
Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner
ESEmiliano Spezi
Emiliano Spezi
PSPavel Solny
Pavel Solny
PMPablo Mínguez
Pablo Mínguez
Francesco CiconeFrancesco Cicone
Francesco Cicone
GFGlenn Flux
Glenn Flux
Currently, the implementation of dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy (MRT) is not well investigated, and in view of the Council Directive (2013/59/Euratom), there is a need to understand the current availability of dosimetry-based MRT in clinical practice and research studies. The aim of this study was to assess the current practice of MRT and dosimetry across European countries. An electronic questionnaire was distributed to European countries. This addressed 18 explicitly considered therapies, and for each therapy, a similar set of questions were included. Questions covered the number of patients and treatments during 2015, involvement of medical specialties and medical physicists, implementation of absorbed dose planning, post-therapy imaging and dosimetry, and the basis of therapy prescription. Responses were obtained from 26 countries and 208 hospitals, administering in total 42,853 treatments. The most common therapies were 131I-NaI for benign thyroid diseases and thyroid ablation of adults. The involvement of a medical physicist (mean over all 18 therapies) was reported to be either minority or never by 32% of the responders. The percentage of responders that reported that dosimetry was included on an always/majority basis differed between the therapies and showed a median value of 36%. The highest percentages were obtained for 177Lu-PSMA therapy (100%), 90Y microspheres of glass (84%) and resin (82%), 131I-mIBG for neuroblastoma (59%), and 131I-NaI for benign thyroid diseases (54%). The majority of therapies were prescribed based on fixed-activity protocols. The highest number of absorbed-dose based prescriptions were reported for 90Y microsphere treatments in the liver (64% and 96% of responses for resin and glass, respectively), 131I-NaI treatment of benign thyroid diseases (38% of responses), and for 131I-mIBG treatment of neuroblastoma (18% of responses). There is a wide variation in MRT practice across Europe and for different therapies, including the extent of medical-physicist involvement and the implementation of dosimetry-guided treatments.

21 November 2017 in EJNMMI Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCaroline Stokke
Caroline Stokke
PGPablo Minguez Gabiña
Pablo Minguez Gabiña
PSPavel Solný
Pavel Solný
Francesco CiconeFrancesco Cicone
Francesco Cicone
MSMattias Sandström
Mattias Sandström
GFGlenn Flux
Glenn Flux
The European directive on basic safety standards (Council directive 2013/59 Euratom) mandates dosimetry-based treatment planning for radiopharmaceutical therapies. The directive comes into operation February 2018, and the aim of a report produced by the Internal Dosimetry Task Force of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine is to address this aspect of the directive. A summary of the report is presented. A brief review of five of the most common therapy procedures is included in the current text, focused on the potential to perform patient-specific dosimetry. In the full report, 11 different therapeutic procedures are included, allowing additional considerations of effectiveness, references to specific literature on quantitative imaging and dosimetry, and existing evidence for absorbed dose-effect correlations for each treatment. Individualized treatment planning with tracer diagnostics and verification of the absorbed doses delivered following therapy is found to be scientifically feasible for almost all procedures investigated, using quantitative imaging and/or external monitoring. Translation of this directive into clinical practice will have significant implications for resource requirements. Molecular radiotherapy is undergoing a significant expansion, and the groundwork for dosimetry-based treatment planning is already in place. The mandated individualization is likely to improve the effectiveness of the treatments, although must be adequately resourced.

14 September 2015 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Giuseppe MinnitiGiuseppe Minniti
Giuseppe Minniti
CSClaudia Scaringi
Claudia Scaringi
SPSergio Paolini
Sergio Paolini
ECEnrico Clarke
Enrico Clarke
Francesco CiconeFrancesco Cicone
Francesco Cicone
RERiccardo Maurizi Enrici
Riccardo Maurizi Enrici