Lidia Santarpia

Prof. Lidia Santarpia

Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2012 in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lidia SantarpiaLidia Santarpia
Lidia Santarpia
IGIlenia Grandone
Ilenia Grandone
FCFranco Contaldo
Franco Contaldo
FPFabrizio Pasanisi
Fabrizio Pasanisi
Background: Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) is an α‐glycoprotein synthesized in the liver. Its serum level decreases in many clinical conditions such as acute and chronic liver damage, inflammation, injury and infections, and malnutrition.Methods and results: This review collects the main evidence on the emerging role of butyrylcholinesterase as a prognostic marker of liver and nonliver diseases as well as a marker of protein‐energy malnutrition and obesity. In fact, serum concentrations and BChE activity seem to accurately reflect the availability of amino acidic substrates and/or derangement in protein synthesis due to hepatocellular damage. In cancer, with or without liver impairment, serum BChE levels serve as an accurate functional and prognostic indicator, useful for monitoring clinical and therapeutic interventions according to patients’ prognosis. In the absence of inflammation, BChE could also serve as an index of the effectiveness of nutritional support.Conclusions: Serum BChE assessment should be included in routine clinical diagnostic procedures to evaluate patient clinical conditions, in particular in cases of inflammation and/or protein‐energy malnutrition.

24 December 2018 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Iolanda CioffiIolanda Cioffi
Iolanda Cioffi
AEAndrea Evangelista
Andrea Evangelista
PVPonzo Valentina
Ponzo Valentina
GCGiovannino Ciccone
Giovannino Ciccone
LSLaura Soldati
Laura Soldati
Simona BoSimona Bo
Simona Bo
This systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the most recent evidence on the efficacy of intermittent energy restriction (IER) versus continuous energy restriction on weight-loss, body composition, blood pressure and other cardiometabolic risk factors. Randomized controlled trials were systematically searched from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, TRIP databases, EMBASE and CINAHL until May 2018. Effect sizes were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eleven trials were included (duration range 8–24 weeks). All selected intermittent regimens provided ≤ 25% of daily energy needs on “fast” days but differed for type of regimen (5:2 or other regimens) and/or dietary instructions given on the “feed” days (ad libitum energy versus balanced energy consumption). The intermittent approach determined a comparable weight-loss (WMD: − 0.61 kg; 95% CI − 1.70 to 0.47; p = 0.87) or percent weight loss (WMD: − 0.38%, − 1.16 to 0.40; p = 0.34) when compared to the continuous approach. A slight reduction in fasting insulin concentrations was evident with IER regimens (WMD = − 0.89 µU/mL; − 1.56 to − 0.22; p = 0.009), but the clinical relevance of this result is uncertain. No between-arms differences in the other variables were found. Both intermittent and continuous energy restriction achieved a comparable effect in promoting weight-loss and metabolic improvements. Long-term trials are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

1 December 2016 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lidia SantarpiaLidia Santarpia
Lidia Santarpia
ABAntonio Buonomo
Antonio Buonomo
MPMaria Carmen Pagano
Maria Carmen Pagano
LALucia Alfonsi
Lucia Alfonsi
MFMaria Foggia
Maria Foggia
FPFabrizio Pasanisi
Fabrizio Pasanisi

13 June 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMConcetta Montagnese
Concetta Montagnese
Lidia SantarpiaLidia Santarpia
Lidia Santarpia
FIFabio Iavarone
Fabio Iavarone
FSFrancesca Strangio
Francesca Strangio
BSBrigida Sangiovanni
Brigida Sangiovanni
FPFabrizio Pasanisi
Fabrizio Pasanisi
In Eastern Mediterranean countries, undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies coexist with overnutrition-related diseases, such as obesity, heart disease, diabetes and cancer. Many Mediterranean countries have produced Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDGs) to provide the general population with indications for healthy nutrition and lifestyles. This narrative review analyses Eastern Mediterranean countries’ FBDGs and discusses their pictorial representations, food groupings and associated messages on healthy eating and behaviours. In 2012, both the WHO and the Arab Center for Nutrition developed specific dietary guidelines for Arab countries. In addition, seven countries, representing 29% of the Eastern Mediterranean Region population, designated their national FBDGs. At the moment several of these guidelines are available only in the English language. In summary, Eastern Mediterranean FBDGs mainly focus on food safety, not all are available in the local Arabic language, and they do not provide specific suggestions for the large number of foreign workers and migrants.

1 April 2013 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lidia SantarpiaLidia Santarpia
Lidia Santarpia
FCFranco Contaldo
Franco Contaldo
FPFabrizio Pasanisi
Fabrizio Pasanisi

28 April 2022 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDelia Morlino
Delia Morlino
MMMaurizio Marra
Maurizio Marra
Iolanda CioffiIolanda Cioffi
Iolanda Cioffi
Lidia SantarpiaLidia Santarpia
Lidia Santarpia
PPPietro De Placido
Pietro De Placido
FPFabrizio Pasanisi
Fabrizio Pasanisi
Sarcopenia is a common finding in patients with cancer and potentially influences the patient’s outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia, according to the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, in a sample of women with breast cancer (BC) and a BMI lower than 30 kg/m2. This cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with BC, stage 0-III, and receiving therapy for BC; the women were recruited at the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy. A control group with similar age and BMI was selected from the internal database. Anthropometry, bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and hand grip strength (HGS) were measured to detect sarcopenia. A total of 122 patients (mean age 49.3 ± 11.0 years, BMI 24.6 ± 3.0 kg/m2) and 80 healthy controls were analyzed. Sarcopenia was found in 13.9% patients with BC, while none of the subjects in the control group was sarcopenic. By comparing BC patients with and without sarcopenia and the control group, the fat-free mass of sarcopenic BC patients were significantly lower than those of both non-sarcopenic BC patients and the control (p < 0.05). The phase angle was also significantly lower in sarcopenic patients (−0.5 degrees, p = 0.048) than in the control group. Considering the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with BC, our findings suggest the usefulness of body composition and HGS evaluation for early screening of sarcopenia to reduce the risk of associated complications.