Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have progressed significantly in recent decades, but most of them are designed to solve unconstrained multiobjective optimization problems. In fact, many real-world multiobjective problems contain a number of constraints. To promote research on constrained multiobjective optimization, we first propose a problem classification scheme with three primary types of difficulty, which reflect various types of challenges presented by real-world optimization problems, in order to characterize the constraint functions in constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs). These are feasibility-hardness, convergence-hardness, and diversity-hardness. We then develop a general toolkit to construct difficulty adjustable and scalable CMOPs (DAS-CMOPs, or DAS-CMaOPs when the number of objectives is greater than three) with three types of parameterized constraint functions developed to capture the three proposed types of difficulty. In fact, the combination of the three primary constraint functions with different parameters allows the construction of a large variety of CMOPs, with difficulty that can be defined by a triplet, with each of its parameters specifying the level of one of the types of primary difficulty. Furthermore, the number of objectives in this toolkit can be scaled beyond three. Based on this toolkit, we suggest nine difficulty adjustable and scalable CMOPs and nine CMaOPs, to be called DAS-CMOP1-9 and DAS-CMaOP1-9, respectively. To evaluate the proposed test problems, two popular CMOEAs—MOEA/D-CDP (MOEA/D with constraint dominance principle) and NSGA-II-CDP (NSGA-II with constraint dominance principle) and two popular constrained many-objective evolutionary algorithms (CMaOEAs)—C-MOEA/DD and C-NSGA-III—are used to compare performance on DAS-CMOP1-9 and DAS-CMaOP1-9 with a variety of difficulty triplets, respectively. The experimental results reveal that mechanisms in MOEA/D-CDP may be more effective in solving convergence-hard DAS-CMOPs, while mechanisms of NSGA-II-CDP may be more effective in solving DAS-CMOPs with simultaneous diversity-, feasibility-, and convergence-hardness. Mechanisms in C-NSGA-III may be more effective in solving feasibility-hard CMaOPs, while mechanisms of C-MOEA/DD may be more effective in solving CMaOPs with convergence-hardness. In addition, none of them can solve these problems efficiently, which stimulates us to continue to develop new CMOEAs and CMaOEAs to solve the suggested DAS-CMOPs and DAS-CMaOPs.

Single-machine due-window assignment scheduling with delivery times and variable processing times is investigated, where the variable processing time of a job means that the processing time is a function of its position in a sequence and its resource allocation. Currently, there are multiple optimization objectives for the due-window assignment problem, and there is a small amount of research on optimization problems where the window starting time, the rejected cost and the optimal scheduling are jointly required. The goal of this paper is to minimize the weighed sum of scheduling cost, resource consumption cost and outsourcing measure under the optional job outsourcing (rejection). Under two resource allocation models (i.e., linear and convex resource allocation models), the scheduling cost is the weighted sum of the number of early–tardy jobs, earliness–tardiness penalties and due-window starting time and size, where the weights are positional-dependent. The main contributions of this paper include the study and data simulation of single-machine scheduling with learning effects, delivery times and outsourcing cost. For the weighed sum of scheduling cost, resource consumption cost and outsourcing measure, we prove the polynomial solvability of the problem. Under the common and slack due-window assignments, through the theoretical analysis of the optimal solution, we reveal that four problems can be solved in $O\left(n^6\right)$ time, where n is the number of jobs.

This paper deals with a two-machine flow shop problem with shortening jobs. A shortening job means that the job’s processing time is a decreasing function of its starting time. The aim is to find a sequence that minimizes the makespan of all the jobs. several dominance properties, some lower bounds, and an initial upper bound are derived, which are applied to propose a branch-and-bound algorithm to solve the problem. We also propose some heuristics and mathematical programming. Computational experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithms.

Single-machine group scheduling with general logarithmic deterioration is investigated, where the actual job processing (resp. group setup) time is a non-decreasing function of the sum of the logarithmic job processing (resp. group setup) times of the jobs (resp. groups) already processed. Under some optimal properties, it is shown that the maximal completion time (i.e., makespan) cost is solved in polynomial time and the optimal algorithm is presented. In addition, an extension of the general weighted deterioration model is given.

For the large sparse linear complementarity problem, by reformulating it as an implicit fixed point equation problem, Bai propose a class of modulus-based matrix splitting iteration methods in [12]. In this paper, we discuss one form of these methods-the general modulus-based Jacobi iteration method, proved the convergence, and derive the domain and the optimum value of the parameter for one special situation. Numerical results show that this method is superior to some modulus-related methods in computing efficiency and feasible aspects in some situations.