Giulietta Smulevich

Prof. Giulietta Smulevich

Università degli Studi di Firenze
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

48Years (1979-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2004 in Biophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LTLuca Tofani
Luca Tofani
AFAlessandro Feis
Alessandro Feis
RSRoy E. Snoke
Roy E. Snoke
DBDebora Berti
Debora Berti
PBPiero Baglioni
Piero Baglioni
GSGiulietta Smulevich
Giulietta Smulevich

1 March 2008 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGiulia Bonente
Giulia Bonente
BHBarry D. Howes
Barry D. Howes
SCStefano Caffarri
Stefano Caffarri
GSGiulietta Smulevich
Giulietta Smulevich
Roberto BassiRoberto Bassi
Roberto Bassi
The photosystem II subunit PsbS is essential for excess energy dissipation (qE); however, both lutein and zeaxanthin are needed for its full activation. Based on previous work, two models can be proposed in which PsbS is either 1) the gene product where the quenching activity is located or 2) a proton-sensing trigger that activates the quencher molecules. The first hypothesis requires xanthophyll binding to two PsbS-binding sites, each activated by the protonation of a dicyclohexylcarbodiimide-binding lumen-exposed glutamic acid residue. To assess the existence and properties of these xanthophyll-binding sites, PsbS point mutants on each of the two Glu residues PsbS E122Q and PsbS E226Q were crossed with the npq1/npq4 and lut2/npq4 mutants lacking zeaxanthin and lutein, respectively. Double mutants E122Q/npq1 and E226Q/npq1 had no qE, whereas E122Q/lut2 and E226Q/lut2 showed a strong qE reduction with respect to both lut2 and single glutamate mutants. These findings exclude a specific interaction between lutein or zeaxanthin and a dicyclohexylcarbodiimide-binding site and suggest that the dependence of nonphotochemical quenching on xanthophyll composition is not due to pigment binding to PsbS. To verify, in vitro, the capacity of xanthophylls to bind PsbS, we have produced recombinant PsbS refolded with purified pigments and shown that Raman signals, previously attributed to PsbS-zeaxanthin interactions, are in fact due to xanthophyll aggregation. We conclude that the xanthophyll dependence of qE is not due to PsbS but to other pigment-binding proteins, probably of the Lhcb type.

1 January 2001 in Protein Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAnette Henriksen
Anette Henriksen
OMOsman Mirza
Osman Mirza
CIChiara Indiani
Chiara Indiani
KTKaare Teilum
Kaare Teilum
GSGiulietta Smulevich
Giulietta Smulevich
MGMichael Gajhede
Michael Gajhede
Soybean seed coat peroxidase (SBP) is a peroxidase with extraordinary stability and catalytic properties. It belongs to the family of class III plant peroxidases that can oxidize a wide variety of organic and inorganic substrates using hydrogen peroxide. Because the plant enzyme is a heterogeneous glycoprotein, SBP was produced recombinant in Escherichia coli for the present crystallographic study. The three‐dimensional structure of SBP shows a bound tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane molecule (TRIS). This TRIS molecule has hydrogen bonds to active site residues corresponding to the residues that interact with the small phenolic substrate ferulic acid in the horseradish peroxidase C (HRPC):ferulic acid complex. TRIS is positioned in what has been described as a secondary substrate‐binding site in HRPC, and the structure of the SBP:TRIS complex indicates that this secondary substrate‐binding site could be of functional importance. SBP has one of the most solvent accessible δ‐meso haem edge (the site of electron transfer from reducing substrates to the enzymatic intermediates compound I and II) so far described for a plant peroxidase and structural alignment suggests that the volume of Ile74 is a factor that influences the solvent accessibility of this important site. A contact between haem C8 vinyl and the sulphur atom of Met37 is observed in the SBP structure. This interaction might affect the stability of the haem group by stabilisation/delocalisation of the porphyrin π‐cation of compound I.

19 April 1994 in Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAlessandro Feis
Alessandro Feis
MMMario P. Marzocchi
Mario P. Marzocchi
MPMauro Paoli
Mauro Paoli
GSGiulietta Smulevich
Giulietta Smulevich

18 March 2010 in JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FSFederica Sinibaldi
Federica Sinibaldi
BHBarry D. Howes
Barry D. Howes
MPMaria Cristina Piro
Maria Cristina Piro
FPFabio Polticelli
Fabio Polticelli
Cecilia BombelliCecilia Bombelli
Cecilia Bombelli
RSRoberto Santucci
Roberto Santucci

1 July 1988 in Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GSGiulietta Smulevich
Giulietta Smulevich
JMJ. Matthew Mauro
J. Matthew Mauro
LFLaurence A. Fishel
Laurence A. Fishel
AEAnn M. English
Ann M. English
JKJoseph Kraut
Joseph Kraut
TSThomas G. Spiro
Thomas G. Spiro