Background: The respective abilities of the GOHAI and OHIP-14 to discriminate between aged patients with different levels of oral diseases have rarely been studied in developing countries. The aim of this study was to compare the discriminative abilities of the OHIP-14 and the GOHAI in an elderly Lebanese population, and particularly to identify persons with different masticatory function.Methods: A sample of elderly, aged 65 years or more, living independently was recruited in two primary care offices in Beirut, Lebanon. Data were collected by means of personal interview and clinical examination. The Arabic OHIP-14 and GOHAI questionnaires were used after cultural adaptation for use in Lebanon. The internal consistency, reproducibility and concurrent validity were verified. To test their discriminative abilities, the ADD (GOHAI and OHIP) and SC (GOHAI and OHIP) scores were dichotomized according to the 25^thand 75^thpercentile respectively and logistic regressions were conducted using socio-demographic, clinical and subjective explanatory variables.Results: Two hundred and six participants were included; mean age was 72 years and 60% were women. Good psychometric properties were observed for both questionnaires for internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha>0.88), reproducibility (ICC>0.86) and concurrent validity. Strong correlations were found between GOHAI and OHIP-14 scores but a high prevalence of subjects with no impact was observed using the OHIP-14. Both questionnaires were able to discriminate between participants according to age, perception of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain or functional status as represented by the number of dental Functional Units (FU). GOHAI was more discriminant since it identified participants with high dental care needs: high numbers of decayed teeth, low numbers of teeth and socially deprived status.Conclusions: Lebanese elderly with high dental care needs and impaired oral health were identified more easily with the GOHAI. These results may guide the choice of dental indicators to use in a national geriatric survey.

Although the intraoral scanning of edentulous ridges is feasible, clinical evidence that the resulting denture retention is equivalent to that achieved with conventional impressions is lacking. The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the retention of complete denture bases fabricated from digital intraoral scans versus conventional impressions by using border molding and posterior palatal seal compression. Twenty volunteers with an edentulous maxilla were recruited. An intraoral scan of the maxilla and a conventionally border-molded impression with a custom tray were made. The conventional impression was poured; the definitive cast was scanned. Three-dimensionally (3D) printed (PB1) and milled bases (MB1) were fabricated based on the scan of the definitive cast. Based on the intraoral scan, a 3D-printed (PB2) and a milled base (MB2) were fabricated. On each base, a platform with a hook consisting of a central notch orienting the force against the post dam (PD) and 2 lateral notches orienting the forces against the left (LT) and right (RT) tuberosities was set in the center of the outer surface of the base. A traction dynamometer was inserted in the hook and oriented into the corresponding notch by applying force until dislodgement. All bases were subsequently stored in artificial saliva for 2 weeks and scanned. Retention testing was repeated by using the same procedure. To evaluate trueness and to visualize the differences on a color map, the scan of the definitive cast and the intraoral scans were matched and compared in 3 dimensions. The Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the retention of the different bases (95% confidence interval, α=.05). Nineteen participants with a mean ±standard deviation age of 64.1 ±14.7 years completed the 4 study sessions. The retention of printed bases (PD: 16.08 ±15.28 N; LT: 14.98 ±14.72 N; RT: 11.28 ±9.57 N) and milled bases (PD:14.52 ±17.07 N; RT: 11.99 ±12.10 N; LT: 13.55 ±15.53 N) fabricated from conventional impressions presented significantly higher retentive forces than those printed (PD: 6.21 ±4.72 N; RT:5.12 ±2.78 N; LT: 4.45 ±2.77 N) and milled (PD: 6.58 ±4.92 N; RT: 4.65 ±2.63 N; LT: 5.02 ±3.58 N) from the intraoral scans (P<.05). The differences were significant in all directions of dislodgement, as well as after storage in artificial saliva for 2 weeks. Comparison of the 3D distances between the intraoral scan and the definitive cast revealed a mean deviation of 0.45 ±0.11 mm. Conventional impressions of the edentulous maxilla, including the clinical steps of border molding and posterior palatal seal compression, provide better retention than digital intraoral scans with both milled and 3D-printed denture bases.

To compare five indices of adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD) among adults living in the Mediterranean region. A total of 100 healthy Lebanese adults aged between 18 and 65 years. Face-to-face interviews to collect sociodemographic and medical information, to take anthropometric measurements, and to fill a validated, culturally adapted, food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The score for each item was calculated following the recommendations for each corresponding index. The five MD indices were Mediterranean Diet Scale (MDScale), Mediterranean Food Pattern (MFP), MD Score (MDS), Short Mediterranean Diet Questionnaire (SMDQ), and the MedDiet score. Significant correlations were detected between items with P-values < 0.001. Minimal agreement was seen between MDScale and MedDiet score and maximal agreement between MDS and MedDiet score. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that MDS and MedDiet scores had significant correlations with fiber and olive oil intake, main components of the MD. MDScale showed a significant correlation with waist-to-hip ratio and with total energy intake but none of the five indices was correlated to body mass index (BMI). The indices that showed the highest correlation with variables related to the MD are the MDScale and the MedDiet score; therefore, they can be used to assess our future study populations. Based on the current results, more than half of the study population was non-adherent to the MD and adherence to this diet did not appear to protect against being overweight (BMI ≥ 30).

Time and cost are factors that influence a patient's decision on dental prosthetic treatment. Evidence is needed to demonstrate that restoration using digital systems is more rapid and less costly than the conventional process. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze and compare the duration and cost of fixed dental prostheses fabricated using digital and conventional methods from scanning or impression making to delivery of the prosthesis. A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P 2015) guidelines. The analysis methods and inclusion criteria were documented in a protocol registered in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42023458734). The bibliographic search was carried out using PubMed, Cochrane, and PROSPERO databases. The main keywords used were (Prosthodontic OR restorative dentistry OR denture) AND (CAD CAM OR Digital workflow OR Computer Dentistry OR Digital Design) AND (Economic OR cost OR Financial OR time efficiency). Two investigators undertook the different steps of article selection. A total of 8 articles published between 2010 and 2023 were found for the qualitative synthesis by using the search criteria. Two studies showed that conventional impressions took more time than digital scans for the fabrication of a single crown, and 1 study showed the opposite. One study found that a digital scan was faster than conventional impression making for the fabrication of a 3-unit fixed partial denture, and another study showed the opposite. The dental laboratory technician spent more time on the conventional workflow than the digital workflow for the 3-unit framework and veneering process. No difference was found between conventional and digital workflows for clinical evaluation and chairside adjustment for the fabrication of a single crown. No articles have compared the cost of fixed prostheses. The digital pathway can shorten the laboratory process. However, the duration of the impression or scan may vary depending on the technique used. Studies are needed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the fabrication of tooth-supported restorations.

The purpose of this review is to investigate the relationship between oral health status and oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in older people and to collect a list of oral health indicators that can enable carers and health professionals to screen for risk of dysphagia in older people during oral examinations. A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P 2015) guidelines. The analysis methods and inclusion criteria were documented in a protocol published in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42020140458. A total of 19 articles published between 2002 and 2020 were retained by the search criteria for the qualitative synthesis. Eighteen studies demonstrated at least one positive association between an oral health component (dental, salivary and/or muscular) and dysphagia. This review highlights that oral health and OD are associated but was not able to determine causality. The lack of scientific evidence could be explained by the observational approach of the majority of the studies and the irrelevant choice of oral health indicators. A relationship may exist between oral health and dysphagia, but this review highlights the lack of valid and standardized oral health indicators that would be needed to assess the impact of oral health on the overall health status of individuals.