Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, which makes the prognostic prediction challenging. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death, can be induced by sorafenib. However, the prognostic value of ferroptosis-related genes in HCC remains to be further elucidated. In this study, the mRNA expression profiles and corresponding clinical data of HCC patients were downloaded from public databases. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model was utilized to construct a multigene signature in the TCGA cohort. HCC patients from the ICGC cohort were used for validation. Our results showed that most of the ferroptosis-related genes (81.7%) were differentially expressed between HCC and adjacent normal tissues in the TCGA cohort. Twenty-six differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were correlated with overall survival (OS) in the univariate Cox regression analysis (all adjusted P< 0.05). A 10-gene signature was constructed to stratify patients into two risk groups. Patients in the high-risk group showed significantly reduced OS compared with patients in the low-risk group (P < 0.001 in the TCGA cohort and P = 0.001 in the ICGC cohort). The risk score was an independent predictor for OS in multivariate Cox regression analyses (HR> 1, P< 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed the signature's predictive capacity. Functional analysis revealed that immune-related pathways were enriched, and immune status were different between two risk groups. In conclusion, a novel ferroptosis-related gene signature can be used for prognostic prediction in HCC. Targeting ferroptosis may be a therapeutic alternative for HCC.

Background: The long-term survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT) is poor. Systemic therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy are widely used in HCC patients with PVTT. This study aims to explore the efficacy of combining systemic therapy with transarterial-based therapy in HCC patients with PVTT. Materials and methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed data of HCC patients with PVTT treated with combination therapy (TACE-hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors) or TACE alone in SYSUCC from 2011 to 2020. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and overall response rate were compared. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding bias. Results: A total of 743 HCC patients with PVTT received combination therapy (n=139) or TACE alone (n=604). After propensity score matching, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the combination group than in the TACE group [42.1% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001 (response evaluation criteria in solid tumours); 53.7% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001 (modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours)]. The combination group showed significantly better OS than the TACE group (median OS not reached vs. 10.4 months, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival of the combination and TACE groups was 14.8 and 2.3 months (P < 0.001), respectively. Tumour downstaging followed by salvage liver resection was significantly more common for the combination therapy group than for TACE group (46.3% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001). After salvage liver resection, 31.6% (30/95) and 1.7% (3/179) of the patients achieved a pathological complete response in the combination and TACE groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The grade 3/4 adverse events rates were similar between the two groups (28.1% vs. 35.9%, P=0.092). Conclusion: Compared with TACE alone, combination therapy was safe enough and resulted in survival benefits. This is a promising treatment option for HCC patients with PVTT.

Purpose: Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (E-HCC) is being diagnosed increasingly, and in one half of diagnosed patients, recurrence will develop. Thus, it is urgent to identify recurrence-related markers. We investigated the effectiveness of CpG methylation in predicting recurrence for patients with E-HCCs. Patients and Methods: In total, 576 patients with E-HCC from four independent centers were sorted by three phases. In the discovery phase, 66 tumor samples were analyzed using the Illumina Methylation 450k Beadchip. Two algorithms, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation and Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination, were used to select significant CpGs. In the training phase, penalized Cox regression was used to further narrow CpGs into 140 samples. In the validation phase, candidate CpGs were validated using an internal cohort (n = 141) and two external cohorts (n = 191 and n =104). Results: After combining the 46 CpGs selected by the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation and the Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination algorithms, three CpGs corresponding to SCAN domain containing 3, Src homology 3-domain growth factor receptor-bound 2-like interacting protein 1, and peptidase inhibitor 3 were highlighted as candidate predictors in the training phase. On the basis of the three CpGs, a methylation signature for E-HCC (MSEH) was developed to classify patients into high- and low-risk recurrence groups in the training cohort ( P < .001). The performance of MSEH was validated in the internal cohort ( P < .001) and in the two external cohorts ( P < .001; P = .002). Furthermore, a nomogram comprising MSEH, tumor differentiation, cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus surface antigen, and antivirus therapy was generated to predict the 5-year recurrence-free survival in the training cohort, and it performed well in the three validation cohorts (concordance index: 0.725, 0.697, and 0.693, respectively). Conclusion: MSEH, a three-CpG–based signature, is useful in predicting recurrence for patients with E-HCC.

To prospectively evaluate whether use of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) results in better survival compared with use of RFA alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. This study was local ethical committee approved; all patients gave written informed consent. One hundred thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to undergo RFA-PEI (n = 66; 57 men, nine women; mean age, 53.3 years; age range, 32-73 years) or RFA alone (n = 67; 58 men, nine women; mean age, 52.2 years; age range, 33-74 years). Patients with viable tumors at computed tomography (CT) 4 weeks after treatment received additional treatment. Overall survival rates were calculated and 3-year survival rates were compared with life-table and Mantel-Haenszel analyses, respectively. Survival curves were constructed and compared by using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests, respectively. The relative prognostic significance of variables in predicting overall survival and the time to tumor recurrence or metastasis were assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression analyses, respectively. One-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 95.4%, 89.2%, 75.8%, 63.3%, and 49.3%, respectively, with RFA-PEI and 89.6%, 68.7%, 58.4%, 50.3%, and 35.9%, respectively, with RFA alone. The survival curve for the RFA-PEI group was significantly better than that for the RFA-only group (P = .04). The survival curve for the RFA-PEI group was better than that for the RFA-only group with 3.1-5.0-cm tumors (P = .03) but not for those with 3.0 cm or smaller (P = .44) or 5.1-7.0-cm (P = .70) tumors. Overall tumor recurrence was lower with RFA-PEI (23 patients) than with RFA alone (33 patients, nonsignificant difference). Local recurrence was significantly lower with RFA-PEI (four patients) than with RFA alone (14 patients, P = .012). Tumor diameter proved to be the only significant prognostic factor for overall recurrence and intrahepatic recurrence. Treatment type and tumor size were significant prognostic factors for local recurrence. RFA-PEI facilitated better local tumor control and long-term survival compared with RFA alone.