Bruno Ramos-Molina

Dr. Bruno Ramos-Molina

Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB-Arrixaca), 30120 Murcia, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 May 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLidia Sánchez-Alcoholado
Lidia Sánchez-Alcoholado
Bruno Ramos-MolinaBruno Ramos-Molina
Bruno Ramos-Molina
AOAna Otero
Ana Otero
ALAurora Laborda-Illanes
Aurora Laborda-Illanes
RORafael Ordóñez-Marmolejo
Rafael Ordóñez-Marmolejo
MQMaría Isabel Queipo-Ortuño
María Isabel Queipo-Ortuño
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that gut microbiota can alter CRC susceptibility and progression by modulating mechanisms such as inflammation and DNA damage, and by producing metabolites involved in tumor progression or suppression. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota has been observed in patients with CRC, with a decrease in commensal bacterial species (butyrate-producing bacteria) and an enrichment of detrimental bacterial populations (pro-inflammatory opportunistic pathogens). CRC is characterized by altered production of bacterial metabolites directly involved in cancer metabolism including short-chain fatty acids and polyamines. Emerging evidence suggests that diet has an important impact on the risk of CRC development. The intake of high-fiber diets and the supplementation of diet with polyunsaturated fatty acids, polyphenols and probiotics, which are known to regulate gut microbiota, could be not only a potential mechanism for the reduction of CRC risk in a primary prevention setting, but may also be important to enhance the response to cancer therapy when used as adjuvant to conventional treatment for CRC. Therefore, a personalized modulation of the pattern of gut microbiome by diet may be a promising approach to prevent the development and progression of CRC and to improve the efficacy of antitumoral therapy.

14 March 2019 in Frontiers in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bruno Ramos-MolinaBruno Ramos-Molina
Bruno Ramos-Molina
MQMaria Isabel Queipo-Ortuño
Maria Isabel Queipo-Ortuño
ALAna Lambertos
Ana Lambertos
FTFrancisco J. Tinahones
Francisco J. Tinahones
RPRafael Peñafiel
Rafael Peñafiel
The polyamines putrescine, spermidine, and spermine are widely distributed polycationic compounds essential for cellular functions. Intracellular polyamine pools are tightly regulated by a complex regulatory mechanism involving de novo biosynthesis, catabolism, and transport across the plasma membrane. In mammals, both the production of polyamines and their uptake from the extracellular space are controlled by a set of proteins named antizymes and antizyme inhibitors. Dysregulation of polyamine levels has been implicated in a variety of human pathologies, especially cancer. Additionally, decreases in the intracellular and circulating polyamine levels during aging have been reported. The differences in the polyamine content existing among tissues are mainly due to the endogenous polyamine metabolism. In addition, a part of the tissue polyamines has its origin in the diet or their production by the intestinal microbiome. Emerging evidence has suggested that exogenous polyamines (either orally administrated or synthetized by the gut microbiota) are able to induce longevity in mice, and that spermidine supplementation exerts cardioprotective effects in animal models. Furthermore, the administration of either spermidine or spermine has been shown to be effective for improving glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity and reducing adiposity and hepatic fat accumulation in diet-induced obesity mouse models. The exogenous addition of agmatine, a cationic molecule produced through arginine decarboxylation by bacteria and plants, also exerts significant effects on glucose metabolism in obese models, as well as cardioprotective effects. In this review, we will discuss some aspects of polyamine metabolism and transport, how diet can affect circulating and local polyamine levels, and how the modulation of either polyamine intake or polyamine production by gut microbiota can be used for potential therapeutic purposes.

17 May 2016 in Endocrine Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPieter Stijnen
Pieter Stijnen
Bruno Ramos-MolinaBruno Ramos-Molina
Bruno Ramos-Molina
SOStephen O'Rahilly
Stephen O'Rahilly
JCJohn W. M. Creemers
John W. M. Creemers
Article published by the Endocrine Society Article published by the Endocrine Society

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLidia Sánchez-Alcoholado
Lidia Sánchez-Alcoholado
RORafael Ordóñez-Marmolejo
Rafael Ordóñez-Marmolejo
AOAna Otero
Ana Otero
IPIsaac Plaza-Andrades
Isaac Plaza-Andrades
ALAurora Laborda-Illanes
Aurora Laborda-Illanes
MQMaría Isabel Queipo-Ortuño
María Isabel Queipo-Ortuño
Obesity is considered an important factor that increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). So far, the association of gut microbiota with both obesity and cancer has been described independently. Nevertheless, a specific obesity-related microbial profile linked to CRC development has not been identified. The aim of this study was to determine the gut microbiota composition in fecal samples from CRC patients with (OB-CRC) and without obesity (L-CRC) compared to the microbiota profile present in non-obese healthy controls (L-HC), in order to unravel the possible relationship between gut microbiota and microbial-derived metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), the inflammatory status, and the intestinal permeability in the context of obesity-associated CRC. The presence of obesity does not induce significant changes in the diversity and richness of intestinal bacteria of CRC patients. Nevertheless, OB-CRC patients display a specific gut microbiota profile characterized by a reduction in butyrate-producing bacteria and an overabundance of opportunistic pathogens, which in turn could be responsible, at least in part, for the higher levels of proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β, the deleterious bacterial metabolite TMAO, and gut permeability found in these patients. These results suggest a possible role of obesity-related gut microbiota in the development of CRC, which could give new clues for the design of new diagnostic tools for CRC prevention.

1 January 2016
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
Bruno Ramos-MolinaBruno Ramos-Molina
Bruno Ramos-Molina
MMM.G. Martin
M.G. Martin
ILIris Lindberg
Iris Lindberg

1 February 2019 in American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMercedes Clemente-Postigo
Mercedes Clemente-Postigo
WOWilfredo Oliva-Olivera
Wilfredo Oliva-Olivera
LCLeticia Coin-Aragüez
Leticia Coin-Aragüez
Bruno Ramos-MolinaBruno Ramos-Molina
Bruno Ramos-Molina
Rosa María Giráldez-PérezRosa María Giráldez-Pérez
Rosa María Giráldez-Pérez
FTFrancisco J. Tinahones
Francisco J. Tinahones
Impaired adipose tissue (AT) lipid handling and inflammation is associated with obesity-related metabolic diseases. Circulating lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) from gut microbiota (metabolic endotoxemia), proposed as a triggering factor for the low-grade inflammation in obesity, might also be responsible for AT dysfunction. Nevertheless, this hypothesis has not been explored in human obesity. To analyze the relationship between metabolic endotoxemia and AT markers for lipogenesis, lipid handling, and inflammation in human obesity, 33 patients with obesity scheduled for surgery were recruited and classified according to their LPS levels. Visceral and subcutaneous AT gene and protein expression were analyzed and adipocyte and AT in vitro assays performed. Subjects with obesity with a high degree of metabolic endotoxemia had lower expression of key genes for AT function and lipogenesis ( SREBP1, FABP4, FASN, and LEP) but higher expression of inflammatory genes in visceral and subcutaneous AT than subjects with low LPS levels. In vitro experiments corroborated that LPS are responsible for adipocyte and AT inflammation and downregulation of PPARG, SCD, FABP4, and LEP expression and LEP secretion. Thus, metabolic endotoxemia influences AT physiology in human obesity by decreasing the expression of factors involved in AT lipid handling and function as well as by increasing inflammation.