Read the full review for this F1000Prime recommended article: Two pathways for base excision repair in mammalian cells.

DNA ligase III and the essential protein XRCC1 are present at greatly reduced levels in the xrcc1 mutant CHO cell line EM-C11. Cell-free extracts prepared from these cells were used to examine the role of the XRCC1 gene product in DNA base excision repairin vitro. EM-C11 cell extract was partially defective in ligation of base excision repair patches, in comparison to wild type CHO-9 extracts. Of the two branches of the base excision repair pathway, only the single nucleotide insertion pathway was affected; no ligation defect was observed in the proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent pathway. Full complementation of the ligation defect in EM-C11 extracts was achieved by addition to the repair reaction of recombinant human DNA ligase III but not by XRCC1. This is consistent with the notion that XRCC1 acts as an important stabilizing factor of DNA ligase III. These data demonstrate for the first time that xrcc1 mutant cells are partially defective in ligation of base excision repair patches and that the defect is specific to the polymerase β-dependent single nucleotide insertion pathway.

Acute myelogenous leukemias (AMLs) are genetically heterogeneous and characterized by chromosomal rearrangements that produce fusion proteins with aberrant transcriptional regulatory activities. Expression of AML fusion proteins in transgenic mice increases the risk of myeloid leukemias, suggesting that they induce a preleukemic state. The underlying molecular and biological mechanisms are, however, unknown. To address this issue, we performed a systematic analysis of fusion protein transcriptional targets. We expressed AML1/ETO, PML/RAR, and PLZF/RAR in U937 hemopoietic precursor cells and measured global gene expression using oligonucleotide chips. We identified 1,555 genes regulated concordantly by at least two fusion proteins that were further validated in patient samples and finally classified according to available functional information. Strikingly, we found that AML fusion proteins induce genes involved in the maintenance of the stem cell phenotype and repress DNA repair genes, mainly of the base excision repair pathway. Functional studies confirmed that ectopic expression of fusion proteins constitutively activates pathways leading to increased stem cell renewal (e.g., the Jagged1/Notch pathway) and provokes accumulation of DNA damage. We propose that expansion of the stem cell compartment and induction of a mutator phenotype are relevant features underlying the leukemic potential of AML-associated fusion proteins.

It has been reported that cancer stem cells may contribute to glioma radioresistance through preferential activation of the DNA damage checkpoint response and an increase in DNA repair capacity. We have examined DNA repair in five stem and nonstem glioma cell lines. The population doubling time was significantly increased in stem compared with nonstem cells, and enhanced activation of Chk1 and Chk2 kinases was observed in untreated CD133⁺ compared with CD133⁻ cells. Neither DNA base excision or single-strand break repair nor resolution of pH2AX nuclear foci were increased in CD133⁺ compared with CD133⁻ cells. We conclude that glioma stem cells display elongated cell cycle and enhanced basal activation of checkpoint proteins that might contribute to their radioresistance, whereas enhanced DNA repair is not a common feature of these cells. (Mol Cancer Res 2009;7(3):383–92)

The importance of DNA repair as a resistance mechanism in gliomas, the most aggressive form of brain tumor, is a clinically relevant topic. Recent studies show that not all cells are equally malignant in gliomas. Certain subpopulations are particularly prone to drive tumor progression and resist chemo- and radiotherapy. Those cells have been variably named cancer stem cells or cancer-initiating cells or tumor-propagating cells, owing to their possible (but still uncertain) origin from normal stem cells. Although DNA repair reduces the efficacy of chemotherapeutics and ionizing radiation toward bulk gliomas, its contribution to resistance of the rare glioma stem cell subpopulations is less clear. Mechanisms other than DNA repair (in particular low proliferation and activation of the DNA damage checkpoint response) are likely main players of resistance in glioma stem cells and their targeting might yield significant therapeutic gains. (Mol Cancer Res 2009;7(7):989–99)