Lung cancer cells are well-documented to rewire their metabolism and energy production networks to support rapid survival and proliferation. This metabolic reorganization has been recognized as a hallmark of cancer. The increased uptake of glucose and the increased activity of the glycolytic pathway have been extensively described. However, over the past years, increasing evidence has shown that lung cancer cells also require glutamine to fulfill their metabolic needs. As a nitrogen source, glutamine contributes directly (or indirectly upon conversion to glutamate) to many anabolic processes in cancer, such as the biosynthesis of amino acids, nucleobases, and hexosamines. It plays also an important role in the redox homeostasis, and last but not least, upon conversion to α-ketoglutarate, glutamine is an energy and anaplerotic carbon source that replenishes tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates. The latter is generally indicated as glutaminolysis. In this review, we explore the role of glutamine metabolism in lung cancer. Because lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death with limited curative treatment options, we focus on the potential therapeutic approaches targeting the glutamine metabolism in cancer.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with five-year survival rates varying from 3–62%. Screening aims at early detection, but half of the patients are diagnosed in advanced stages, limiting therapeutic possibilities. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is an essential technique in lung cancer detection and staging, with a sensitivity reaching 96%. However, since elevated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake is not cancer-specific, PET-CT often fails to discriminate between malignant and non-malignant PET-positive hypermetabolic lesions, with a specificity of only 23%. Furthermore, discrimination between lung cancer types is still impossible without invasive procedures. High mortality and morbidity, low survival rates, and difficulties in early detection, staging, and typing of lung cancer motivate the search for biomarkers to improve the diagnostic process and life expectancy. Metabolomics has emerged as a valuable technique for these pitfalls. Over 150 metabolites have been associated with lung cancer, and several are consistent in their findings of alterations in specific metabolite concentrations. However, there is still more variability than consistency due to the lack of standardized patient cohorts and measurement protocols. This review summarizes the identified metabolic biomarkers for early diagnosis, staging, and typing and reinforces the need for biomarkers to predict disease progression and survival and to support treatment follow-up.

Pulmonary imaging often identifies suspicious abnormalities resulting in supplementary diagnostic procedures. This study aims to investigate whether the metabolic fingerprint of plasma allows to discriminate between patients with lung inflammation and patients with lung cancer. Metabolic profiles of plasma from 347 controls, 269 cancer patients and 108 patients with inflammation were obtained by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Models to discriminate between groups were trained by PLS-LDA. A test set was used for independent validation. A ROC curve was built to evaluate the diagnostic performance of potential biomarkers. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PET-CT to diagnose cancer are 96, 23, 76 and 71%. Metabolic profiles differentiate between cancer and inflammation with a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 87% and a MCE of 12%. Removal of the glutamate metabolite results in an increase of MCE (38%) and a decrease of both sensitivity and specificity (62%), demonstrating the importance of glutamate for discrimination. At the cut-off point 0.31 on the ROC curve, the relative glutamate concentration discriminates between cancer and inflammation with a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 81%, and an AUC of 0.88. PPV and NPV are 92 and 69%. In PET-positive patients with a relative glutamate level ≤ 0.31 the sensitivity to diagnose cancer reaches 100% with a PPV of 94%. In PET-negative patients, a relative glutamate level > 0.31 increases the specificity of PET from 23% to 58% and results in a high NPV of 100%. In case of discrepancy between SUVmax and the glutamate concentration, lung cancer is missed in 19% of the cases. This study indicates that the 1H-NMR-derived relative plasma concentration of glutamate allows discrimination between lung cancer and lung inflammation. A glutamate level ≤ 0.31 in PET-positive patients corresponds to the diagnosis of lung cancer with a higher specificity and PPV than PET-CT. Glutamate levels > 0.31 in patients with PET negative lung lesions is likely to correspond with inflammation. Caution is needed for patients with conflicting SUVmax values and glutamate concentrations. Confirmation is needed in a prospective study with external validation and by another analytical technique such as HPLC-MS.

Lung cancer cells are well documented to rewire their metabolism and energy production networks to enable proliferation and survival in a nutrient-poor and hypoxic environment. Although metabolite profiling of blood plasma and tissue is still emerging in omics approaches, several techniques have shown potential in cancer diagnosis. In this paper, the authors describe the alterations in the metabolic phenotype of lung cancer patients. In addition, we focus on the metabolic cooperation between tumor cells and healthy tissue. Furthermore, the authors discuss how metabolomics could improve the management of lung cancer patients.

Background: Lung cancer can be detected by measuring the patient’s plasma metabolomic profile using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. This NMR-based plasma metabolomic profile is patient-specific and represents a snapshot of the patient’s metabolite concentrations. The onset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) causes a change in the metabolite profile. However, the level of metabolic changes after complete NSCLC removal is currently unknown. Patients and methods: Fasted pre- and postoperative plasma samples of 74 patients diagnosed with resectable stage I-IIIA NSCLC were analyzed using ¹H-NMR spectroscopy. NMR spectra (s = 222) representing two preoperative and one postoperative plasma metabolite profile at three months after surgical resection were obtained for all patients. In total, 228 predictors, i.e., 228 variables representing plasma metabolite concentrations, were extracted from each NMR spectrum. Two types of supervised multivariate discriminant analyses were used to train classifiers presenting a strong differentiation between the pre- and postoperative plasma metabolite profiles. The validation of these trained classification models was obtained by using an independent dataset. Results: A trained multivariate discriminant classification model shows a strong differentiation between the pre- and postoperative NSCLC profiles with a specificity of 96% (95% CI [86–100]) and a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI [81–98]). Validation of this model results in an excellent predictive accuracy of 90% (95% CI [77–97]) and an AUC value of 0.97 (95% CI [0.93–1]). The validation of a second trained model using an additional preoperative control sample dataset confirms the separation of the pre- and postoperative profiles with a predictive accuracy of 93% (95% CI [82–99]) and an AUC value of 0.97 (95% CI [0.93–1]). Metabolite analysis reveals significantly increased lactate, cysteine, asparagine and decreased acetate levels in the postoperative plasma metabolite profile. Conclusions: The results of this paper demonstrate that surgical removal of NSCLC generates a detectable metabolic shift in blood plasma. The observed metabolic shift indicates that the NSCLC metabolite profile is determined by the tumor’s presence rather than donor-specific features. Furthermore, the ability to detect the metabolic difference before and after surgical tumor resection strongly supports the prospect that NMR-generated metabolite profiles via blood samples advance towards early detection of NSCLC recurrence.

The reprogrammed metabolism of cancer cells reflects itself in an alteration of metabolite concentrations, which in turn can be used to define a specific metabolic phenotype or fingerprint for cancer. In this contribution, a metabolism-based discrimination between lung cancer patients and healthy controls, derived from an analysis of human blood plasma by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy, is described. This technique is becoming widely used in the field of metabolomics because of its ability to provide a highly informative spectrum, representing the relative metabolite concentrations. Cancer types are characterized by decreased or increased levels of specific plasma metabolites, such as glucose or lactate, compared to controls. Data analysis by multivariate statistics provides a classification model with high levels of sensitivity and specificity. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics might not only contribute to the diagnosis of lung cancer but also shows potential for treatment follow-up as well as for paving the way to a better understanding of disease-related diverting biochemical pathways.