Lucia C. Strader

Lucia C. Strader


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2003 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKaren M. McGinnis
Karen M. McGinnis
STStephen G. Thomas
Stephen G. Thomas
JSJonathan D. Soule
Jonathan D. Soule
LSLucia C. Strader
Lucia C. Strader
JZJanice M. Zale
Janice M. Zale
CSCamille M Steber
Camille M Steber
The Arabidopsis SLY1 (SLEEPY1) gene positively regulates gibberellin (GA) signaling. Positional cloning of SLY1 revealed that it encodes a putative F-box protein. This result suggests that SLY1 is the F-box subunit of an SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase that regulates GA responses. The DELLA domain protein RGA (repressor of ga1-3) is a repressor of GA response that appears to undergo GA-stimulated protein degradation. RGA is a potential substrate of SLY1, because sly1 mutations cause a significant increase in RGA protein accumulation even after GA treatment. This result suggests SCFSLY1-targeted degradation of RGA through the 26S proteasome pathway. Further support for this model is provided by the observation that an rga null allele partially suppresses the sly1-10 mutant phenotype. The predicted SLY1 amino acid sequence is highly conserved among plants, indicating a key role in GA response.

10 April 2013 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DKDavid Korasick
David Korasick
TETara A. Enders
Tara A. Enders
LSLucia C. Strader
Lucia C. Strader
The plant hormone auxin drives plant growth and morphogenesis. The levels and distribution of the active auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) are tightly controlled through synthesis, inactivation, and transport. Many auxin precursors and modified auxin forms, used to regulate auxin homeostasis, have been identified; however, very little is known about the integration of multiple auxin biosynthesis and inactivation pathways. This review discusses the many ways auxin levels are regulated through biosynthesis, storage forms, and inactivation, and the potential roles modified auxins play in regulating the bioactive pool of auxin to affect plant growth and development.

1 February 2015 in American Journal of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TETara A. Enders
Tara A. Enders
LSLucia C. Strader
Lucia C. Strader
Long before its chemical identity was known, the phytohormone auxin was postulated to regulate plant growth. In the late 1800s, Sachs hypothesized that plant growth regulators, present in small amounts, move differentially throughout the plant to regulate growth. Concurrently, Charles Darwin and Francis Darwin were discovering that light and gravity were perceived by the tips of shoots and roots and that the stimulus was transmitted to other tissues, which underwent a growth response. These ideas were improved upon by Boysen‐Jensen and Paál and were later developed into the Cholodny–Went hypothesis that tropisms were caused by the asymmetric distribution of a growth‐promoting substance. These observations led to many efforts to identify this elusive growth‐promoting substance, which we now know as auxin. In this review of auxin field advances over the past century, we start with a seminal paper by Kenneth Thimann and Charles Schneider titled “The relative activities of different auxins” from the American Journal of Botany, in which they compare the growth altering properties of several auxinic compounds. From this point, we explore the modern molecular understanding of auxin—including its biosynthesis, transport, and perception. Finally, we end this review with a discussion of outstanding questions and future directions in the auxin field. Over the past 100 yr, much of our progress in understanding auxin biology has relied on the steady and collective advance of the field of auxin researchers; we expect that the next 100 yr of auxin research will likewise make many exciting advances.

25 March 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DKDavid Korasick
David Korasick
CWCorey S. Westfall
Corey S. Westfall
SLSoon Goo Lee
Soon Goo Lee
MNMax H. Nanao
Max H. Nanao
RDRenaud Dumas
Renaud Dumas
LSLucia C. Strader
Lucia C. Strader
In plants, the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcription factor family regulates gene expression in response to auxin. In the absence of auxin, ARF transcription factors are repressed by interaction with AUXIN/INDOLE 3-ACETIC ACID (Aux/IAA) proteins. Although the C termini of ARF and Aux/IAA proteins facilitate their homo- and heterooligomerization, the molecular basis for this interaction remained undefined. The crystal structure of the C-terminal interaction domain of Arabidopsis ARF7 reveals a Phox and Bem1p (PB1) domain that provides both positive and negative electrostatic interfaces for directional protein interaction. Mutation of interface residues in the ARF7 PB1 domain yields monomeric protein and abolishes interaction with both itself and IAA17. Expression of a stabilized Aux/IAA protein (i.e., IAA16) bearing PB1 mutations in Arabidopsis suggests a multimerization requirement for ARF protein repression, leading to a refined auxin-signaling model. Significance Auxin is a critical plant hormone that regulates every aspect of plant growth and development. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcription factors control auxin-regulated gene transcription, and their activity is regulated by AUXIN/INDOLE 3-ACETIC ACID repressor proteins. This work identifies that dimerization of the repressor with the transcription factor is insufficient to repress activity, suggesting that multimerization is the mechanism of repressing ARF transcriptional activity and further raising the possibility that multimerization in other systems may play roles in transcriptional repression.

29 November 2021 in Current Opinion in Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLucia C. Strader
Lucia C. Strader
DWDolf Weijers
Dolf Weijers
DWDoris Wagner
Doris Wagner

1 October 2019 in Molecular Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSamantha K. Powers
Samantha K. Powers
AHAlex S. Holehouse
Alex S. Holehouse
DKDavid Korasick
David Korasick
KSKatherine H. Schreiber
Katherine H. Schreiber
NCNatalie Clark
Natalie Clark
LSLucia C. Strader
Lucia C. Strader