Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperones and have an important role in the refolding and degradation of misfolded proteins, and these functions are related to aging. Rotifer is a useful model organism in aging research, owing to small body size (0.1–1 mm), short lifespan (6–14 days), and senescence phenotypes that can be measured relatively easily. Therefore, we used rotifer as a model to determine the role of four typical hsp genes on the aging process in order to provide a better understanding of rotifer aging. We cloned cDNA encoding hsp genes (hsp40, hsp60, hsp70, and hsp90) from the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas, analyzed their molecular characteristics, determined its modulatory response under different temperatures and H2O2 concentrations and investigated the changes in expression of these genes during the aging process. We found that Bchsp70 mRNA expression significantly decreased with aging. In addition, we also studied the effects of dietary restriction (DR) and vitamin E on rotifer lifespan and reproduction and analyzed the changes in expression of these four Bchsp genes in rotifers treated with DR and vitamin E. The results showed that DR extended the lifespan of rotifers and reduced their fecundity, whereas vitamin E had no significant effect on rotifer lifespan or reproduction. Real-time PCR indicated that DR increased the expression of these four Bchsps. However, vitamin E only improved the expression of Bchsp60, and reduced the expression of Bchsp40, Bchsp70, and Bchsp90. DR pretreatment also increased rotifer survival rate under paraquat-induced oxidative stress. These results indicated that hsp genes had an important role in the anti-aging process.
Length–weight (body length; LB versus wet weight; WWT) and chelae length–width (LCh versus WCh) relationships were determined for male and female crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) under culture conditions. The length–weight relationships for males, females, and total individuals were described as WWT = 0.014 × , WWT = 0.020 × , and WWT = 0.017 × , respectively. This relationship was significantly different (p < 0.001) between males and females. Compared to females, males were heavier and their tail length was shorter (p < 0.001). No statistical difference was observed in mean LCh, cheliped length (LCp), and WCh between the right and left sides within a gender (p > 0.05), but significant differences were detected between males and females (p < 0.001). The regressions for LCh versus WCh for males and females were WCh = 3.083 × and WCh = 0.284 × , respectively. This regression differed significantly between males and females; males’ chelae were wider than those of females (p < 0.001). LCh, LCp, and WCh were highly related to LB; males had longer LCh and LCp and wider WCh than females. Individuals without chelipeds were measured to determine the relationship between the length and body weight (WBW). The LB–WBW relationships for males and females were described as WBW = 0.074 × and WBW = 0.033 × respectively. Females exhibited positive allometric growth (b > 3), and males showed negative allometric growth (b < 3). No statistical difference was observed in mean WBW between males and females when LB was used as a covariate (p > 0.05).