Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) represent an important component of geriatric acute hospital care for frail older people, secured by a multidisciplinary team who addresses the multiple needs of physical health, functional ability, psychological state, cognition and social status. The primary objective of the pilot study was to determine feasibility for recruitment and retention rates. Secondary objectives were to establish proof of principle that CGA has the potential to increase patient safety. The CGA pilot took place at a University hospital in Western Sweden, from March to November 2016, with data analyses in March 2017. Participants were frail people aged 75 and older, who required an acute admission to hospital. Participants were recruited and randomized in the emergency room. The intervention group received CGA, a person-centered multidisciplinary team addressing health, participation, and safety. The control group received usual care. The main objective measured the recruitment procedure and retention rates. Secondary objectives were also collected regarding services received on the ward including discharge plan, care plan meeting and hospital risk assessments including risk for falls, nutrition, decubitus ulcers, and activities of daily living status. Participants were recruited from the emergency department, over 32 weeks. Thirty participants were approached and 100% (30/30) were included and randomized, and 100% (30/30) met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen participants were included in the intervention and 14 participants were included in the control. At baseline, 100% (16/16) intervention and 100% (14/14) control completed the data collection. A positive propensity towards the secondary objectives for the intervention was also evidenced, as this group received more care assessments. There was an average difference between the intervention and control in occupational therapy assessment − 0.80 [95% CI 1.06, − 0.57], occupational therapy assistive devices − 0.73 [95% CI 1.00, − 0.47], discharge planning −0.21 [95% CI 0.43, 0.00] and care planning meeting 0.36 [95% CI-1.70, −0.02]. Controlling for documented risk assessments, the intervention had for falls − 0.94 [95% CI 1.08, − 0.08], nutrition − 0.87 [95% CI 1.06, − 0.67], decubitus ulcers − 0.94 [95% CI 1.08, − 0.80], and ADL status − 0.80 [95% CI 1.04, − 0.57]. The CGA pilot was feasible and proof that the intervention increased safety justifies carrying forward to a large-scale study. Clinical Trials ID: NCT02773914 . Registered 16 May 2016.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) for frail older people in Swedish acute hospital settings – the CGA-Swed study. In this study protocol, we present the study design, the intervention and the outcome measures as well as the baseline characteristics of the study participants. The study is a randomised controlled trial with an intervention group receiving the CGA and a control group receiving medical assessment without the CGA. Follow-ups were conducted after 1, 6 and 12 months, with dependence in activities of daily living (ADL) as the primary outcome measure. The study group consisted of frail older people (75 years and older) in need of acute medical hospital care. The study design, randomisation and process evaluation carried out were intended to ensure the quality of the study. Baseline data show that the randomisation was successful and that the sample included frail older people with high dependence in ADL and with a high comorbidity. The CGA contributed to early recognition of frail older people’s needs and ensured a care plan and follow-up. This study is expected to show positive effects on frail older people’s dependence in ADL, life satisfaction and satisfaction with health and social care.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) practices multidimensional, interdisciplinary, and diagnostic processes as a means to identify care needs, plan care, and improve outcomes of frail older people. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze frail older people’s experiences of receiving CGA. Through a secondary analysis, interviews and transcripts were revisited in an attempt to discover the meaning behind the participants’ implied, ambiguous, and verbalized thoughts that were not illuminated in the primary study. Feeling “respected as a person” is the phenomenon participants described on a CGA acute geriatric ward, achieved by having a reciprocal relationship with the ward staff, enabling their participation in decisions when engaged in communication and understanding. However, when a person was too ill to participate, then care was person-supportive care. CGA, when delivered by staff practicing person-centered care, can keep the frail older person in focus despite them being a patient. If a person-centered care approach does not work because the person is too ill, then person-supportive care is delivered. However, when staff and/or organizational practices do not implement a person-centered care approach, this can hinder patients feeling “respected as a person”.

Background: The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) designed to manage frail older people requiring acute medical care, is responsible for diagnostics, assessment, treatment, and planning while addressing a person’s medical, psychological, social, and functional capabilities. The aim was to investigate if CGA had an impact on frail older people’s activities of daily living (ADL) status, self-rated health, and satisfaction with hospital care. Methods: A two-armed design with frail people aged 75 or older who required an unplanned hospital admission were randomized to either the CGA ward or to an acute medical ward. Analyses were made based on the intention-to-treat principle (ITT). The primary outcome was ADL. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and odds ratio. A subgroup analysis was performed due to non-adherence and contamination. Results: One-hundred and fifty-five people participated in the study; 78 in the intervention and 77 in the control. Participants in the intervention group had a higher odds ratio of reporting having received written information and felt that care met their needs during their hospital stay. No additional statistically significant results for the primary or secondary outcomes in the ITT analysis were achieved. Conclusion: Participants felt that the care they received with the CGA ward met their needs. The lack of additional results supporting the CGA could be due to difficulties performing pragmatic intervention trials in clinical hospital settings, and because a CGA during one hospital stay is probably not enough to have long-term effects.

Background: Frail older people are at higher risk of further deterioration if their needs are not acknowledged when they are acutely ill and admitted to hospital. Mental health comprises one area of needs assessment. Aims: The aims of this study were threefold: to investigate the prevalence of depression in frail hospital patients, to identify factors associated with depression, and to compare depression management in patients receiving and not receiving Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Methods: This secondary analysis from the CGA-Swed randomized control trial included 155 frail older people aged 75 years and above. Instruments included Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the ICE Capability measure for older people (ICECAP-O) and the Fugl-Meyer Life Satisfaction scale (Fugl-Meyer Lisat). Depression was broadly defined as MADRS score ≥ 7. Regression models were used to identify variables associated with depression and to compare groups with and without the CGA intervention. Results: The prevalence of a MADRS score indicating depression at baseline was 60.7%. The inability to do things that make one feel valued (ICECAP-O) was associated with a fourfold increase in depression (OR 4.37, CI 1.50–12.75, p = 0.007). There was a two-fold increase in odds of receiving antidepressant medication in the CGA intervention group (OR 2.33, CI 1.15–4.71, p = 0.019) compared to patients in the control group who received regular medical care. Conclusion: Symptoms of depression were common among frail older people with unplanned hospital admission. Being unable to do things that make one feel valued was associated with depression. People who received CGA intervention had higher odds of receiving antidepressant treatment, suggesting that CGA improves recognition of mental health needs during unplanned hospital admissions in frail older people. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02773914. Retrospectively registered 16 May 2016.

Background: When admitted to hospital for unplanned medical needs, the complexity of multiple conditions, including cognitive and mental health, might put older people at greater risk, affecting their survival. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of cognitive impairment versus cognitive impairment with depression and their association with six-month mortality in older people after an unplanned hospital admission in Italy. Methods: In Re.Po.SI. a multi-centre study performed in Italy, standardized web-based case report forms were used to collect data on socio-demographic factors, clinical parameters, diagnoses, treatment history and at discharge, clinical events during hospitalization, and outcome data was collected. A comprehensive geriatric assessment was conducted using Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4), Barthel Index, and Short Blessed Test (SBT). To explore the interrelationship between depression and cognitive impairment, a variable categorized the study population into four mutually exclusive groups. This variable assessed the association between its categories and six-month mortality in a Cox multivariate analysis. Results: One thousand nine hundred fifty six participants were included, with a median age of 80 years (IQR: 73–85). Those who died within six months were likely to be older (82 vs. 79 years), male (56.2% vs. 47.2%), had moderately reduced ability to perform daily activities (82.0 vs. 93.0), exhibited greater illness severity (CIRS-IS: 1.8 vs. 1.6), had more chronically prescribed medications (6.0 vs. 5.0), and had a worse SBT score (10.0 vs. 7.0). When stratified based on cognitive impairment and depression, one-third had neither condition (33.2%), 21.9% had depression, 20.7% had a cognitive impairment, and 24.3% had both conditions. Six-month mortality was higher among people with cognitive impairment only (33.2%) followed by those with both conditions (28.8%), and depression only (22.7%). The unadjusted semi-parametric survival analysis revealed that the hazard ratio (HR) for people with cognitive impairment only was 2.08, for those with both conditions HR was 1.75, and for people with depression only HR was 1.30. Conclusion: While depression alone may contribute to mortality risk, cognitive impairment appears to play a more substantial role in increasing the risk of dying within 6 month from an acute hospitalization. Further research is needed to confirm these finding.