Adrian Shulman

Dr. Adrian Shulman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 January 2017 in Journal of Ovarian Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEliana Muskin Wintner
Eliana Muskin Wintner
AHAnat Hershko-Klement
Anat Hershko-Klement
KTKeren Tzadikevitch
Keren Tzadikevitch
YGYehudith Ghetler
Yehudith Ghetler
OGOfer Gonen
Ofer Gonen
AWAmir Wiser
Amir Wiser
IVF cycles which result in only one good quality embryo, and a second poor quality embryo present a dilemma when the decision involves transferring two embryos. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a poor quality embryo has a negative effect on a good quality embryo when transferred along with a good quality embryo. We retrospectively evaluated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles involving single embryo transfers (SET) and double embryo transfers (DET). Embryo quality was divided into poor “P” and good “G” quality. The main outcome measures were: live birth, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy ratio. Six hundred three women were included. The study group consisted of 180 (29.9%) patients who had a double embryo transfer (DET) with one poor quality embryo and one good quality embryo (P + G). Control 1 group included 303 (50.2%) patients who had DET with two good quality embryos (G + G), and control 2 group consisted of 120 (19.9%) patients who had a single embryo transfer (SET) with one good quality embryo (G). Live birth rates were not significantly different when compared between study groups: 30.8% in the SET group (G), 27.2% in the (G + P) group and 33.7% in the (G + G) group. The SET group had the highest implantation rate (33.9%) compared to the DET groups (21.8% (G + P), 25.4% (G + G)) (P =0.022). The clinical pregnancy rate was 33.3% in the SET group (G), 33.3% in the (G + P) group, and 39.3% in the (G + G) group (P =0.39). The miscarriage rate was comparable in all groups. A poor quality embryo does not negatively affect a good quality embryo, when transferred together in a double embryo transfer.

1 February 2015 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAnat Hershko Klement
Anat Hershko Klement
ABArie Berkovitz
Arie Berkovitz
AWAmir Wiser
Amir Wiser
OGOfer Gonen
Ofer Gonen
KAKeren Amichay
Keren Amichay
ASAdrian Shulman
Adrian Shulman

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAnat Hershko Klement
Anat Hershko Klement
ASAdrian Shulman
Adrian Shulman
Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is no longer a single, omnipotent ovulation triggering option. Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, initially presented as a substitute for hCG, has led to a new era of administering GnRH agonist followed by hCG triggering. According to this new concept, GnRH agonist enables successful ovum maturation, while hCG supports the luteal phase and pregnancy until placental shift.

16 November 2015 in Gynecological Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RTRina Tamir
Rina Tamir
SASarit Allouche
Sarit Allouche
AWAriel Weissman
Ariel Weissman
EHEinat Haikin Herzberger
Einat Haikin Herzberger
SOSuzi Oberman-Farhi
Suzi Oberman-Farhi
AWAmir Wiser
Amir Wiser
To evaluate the effect of dilation and curettage (D&C) and misoprostol as treatments for spontaneous miscarriage (SM) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) parameters in the subsequent IVF cycle.

14 July 2015 in Gynecological Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NSNivin Samara
Nivin Samara
DRDaniel Reis
Daniel Reis
נמנתנאלה מילר
נתנאלה מילר
YGYehudith Ghetler
Yehudith Ghetler
ABArie Berkovitz
Arie Berkovitz
AWAmir Wiser
Amir Wiser
Controlled parameters like timing of antagonist start, duration of antagonist and the optimal leading follicle diameter for HCG triggering had no effect on treatment outcomes.