In recent decades, drugs used to treat malaria infection have been shown to be beneficial for many other diseases, including viral infections. In particular, they have received special attention due to the lack of effective antiviral drugs against new emerging viruses (i.e., HIV, dengue virus, chikungunya virus, Ebola virus, etc.) or against classic infections due to drug-resistant viral strains (i.e., human cytomegalovirus). Here, we reviewed the in vitro/in vivo and clinical studies conducted to evaluate the antiviral activities of four classes of antimalarial drugs: Artemisinin derivatives, aryl-aminoalcohols, aminoquinolines, and antimicrobial drugs.
To provide insight into the dynamics and source of residual viremia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients successfully treated with antiretroviral therapy, 14 intensely monitored patients treated with indinavir and efavirenz sustaining HIV RNA at 5 years were studied. Abacavir was added to the regimen of eight patients at year 5. After the first 9 months of therapy, HIV RNA levels had reached a plateau (“residual viremia”) that persisted for over 5 years. Levels of residual viremia differed among patients and ranged from 3.2 to 23 HIV RNA copies/ml. Baseline HIV DNA was the only significant pretreatment predictor of residual viremia in regression models including baseline HIV RNA, CD4 count, and patient age. In the four of five patients with detectable viremia who added abacavir to their regimen after 5 years, HIV RNA levels declined rapidly. The estimated half-life of infected cells was 6.7 days. Decrease in activated memory cells and a reduction in gamma interferon production to HIV Gag and p24 antigen in ELISpot assays were observed, consistent with a decrease in HIV replication. Thus, in patients treated with efavirenz plus indinavir, levels of residual viremia were established by 9 months, were predicted by baseline proviral DNA, and remained constant for 5 years. Even after years of highly suppressive therapy, HIV RNA levels declined rapidly after the addition of abacavir, suggesting that productive infection contributes to residual ongoing viremia and can be inhibited with therapy intensification.
1 June 1996 in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
We studied the distribution and localization of the human papovaviruses JCV and BKV in the central nervous system (CNS) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of HIV-positive patients with and without progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) as compared with HIV-seronegative patients. The presence of JCV-DNA and BKV-DNA was evaluated by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH) on CNS autopsy tissues of AIDS patients with (group A, n = 13) and without (group B, n = 16) PML and of HIV-negative patients (group C, n = 12). PCR for JCV-DNA and BKV-DNA was also performed on CSF samples collected 7-420 days before death in all the 29 AIDS patients. Tissue PCR for JCV-DNA was positive in all the cases in group A, in 44% of the patients in group B, and in 33% of the patients in group C. ISH was positive in all the cases with PML and in three AIDS cases without PML (12%), but negative in all the HIV-negative cases. BKV-DNA was detected in two cases from group A and in one case from group B. CSF was PCR-positive for JCV-DNA in 8 of 13 (62%) AIDS patients with PML, but in none of the HIV patients without PML, irrespective of the presence of JCV-DNA in CNS tissues. No CSF sample was positive for BKV-DNA. Our data demonstrates that JCV-DNA and, rarely, BKV-DNA can be detected in the CNS of immunocompromised patients with and without PML and also in the CNS of HIV-negative subjects. However, only HIV-positive patients with clinically evident PML and JCV-DNA in the brain have PCR-detectable JCV-DNA in their CSF.
HIV infection in Africa is associated with immune activation and a cytokine profile that stimulates CCR5 expression. We investigated whether this immune activation is environmentally driven; if a dominant expression of CCR5 could indeed be detected in African individuals; and if R5 HIV strains would be prevalent in this population. Freshly drawn peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HIV-uninfected African and Italian individuals living in rural Africa, from HIV-uninfected Africans and Italians living in Italy, and from HIV-infected African and Italian patients were analysed. Determinations of HIV coreceptor-specific mRNAs and immunophenotype analyses were performed in all samples. Virological analyses included virus isolation and characterization of plasma neutralizing activity. Results showed that: immune activation is detected both in Italian and African HIV-uninfected individuals living in Africa but not in African subjects living in Italy; CCR5-specific mRNA is augmented and the surface expression of CCR5 is increased in African compared with Italian residents (CXCR4-specific mRNA is comparable); R5-HIV strains are isolated prevalently from lymphocytes of African HIV-infected patients; and plasma neutralizing activity in HIV-infected African patients is mostly specific for R5 strains. Immune activation in African residents is environmentally driven and not genetically predetermined. This immune activation results in a skewing of the CCR5 : CXCR4 ratio which is associated with a prevalent isolation of R5 viruses. These data suggest that the selection of the predominant virus strain within the population could be influenced by an immunologically driven pattern of HIV co receptor expression.