Shokoofeh Shamsi

Prof. Shokoofeh Shamsi

Charles Sturt University, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 June 2022 in Veterinary Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MZMina Ziarati
Mina Ziarati
MZMohammad Jalil Zorriehzahra
Mohammad Jalil Zorriehzahra
FHFatemeh Hassantabar
Fatemeh Hassantabar
ZMZibandeh Mehrabi
Zibandeh Mehrabi
Manish DhawanManish Dhawan
Manish Dhawan
Shokoofeh ShamsiShokoofeh Shamsi
Shokoofeh Shamsi
Fish and aquatic-derived zoonotic diseases have caused considerable problems in the aquaculture industry and fisheryworldwide. In particular, zoonotic diseases can pose widespread threats to humans. With the world's growing population and potential global trade of aquaculture and fish, the risk of environmental contamination and development of fish and aquatic-derived zoonoses in humans are increasing. The important causes of zoonoses include bacteria, parasites, viruses, and fungi. The zoonotic bacterial agents are divided into two main groups: Gram-positive (Mycobacteriaceae, Streptococcaceae, Erysipelothricaceaefamilies) and Gram-negative (Aeromonadaceae, Vibrionaceae, Pseudomondaceae,Enterobacteriaceae,and Hafniaceaefamilies). The premier parasitic agents include cestodes (tapeworm; e.g.,Diphyllobothrium spp.), trematodes (fluke; e.g., Opisthorchis spp.), and nematodes (round worm;e.g., Anisakis spp.). In addition, protozoan organisms such as Cryptosporidium spp. are also considered fish-derivedzoonotic pathogens.Two groups of fish-associated fungi causing basidiobolomycosis and sporotrichosisalso pose a zoonotic risk for humans. The majority of the fish-derived zoonotic diseases are transmitted to humansmainly via the consumption of improperly cooked or raw fish or fish products. Therefore, the incidence of zoonotic diseases can be reduced by properly processing fish and fish products, e.g., by thermal (heat/freezing) treatment. The prevalence of zoonotic agents in fishes varies seasonally and should be regularly monitored to evaluate the prevalence of pathogens in both wild and cultured fish populations. This reviewfocuses on the fish zoonotic agents/diseases and their control and prevention.

21 February 2011 in Medical Journal of Australia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Shokoofeh ShamsiShokoofeh Shamsi
Shokoofeh Shamsi
ABAndrew R Butcher
Andrew R Butcher
Click on the article title to read more.

1 October 2005 in Molecular and Cellular Probes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Domenico OtrantoDomenico Otranto
Domenico Otranto
GTG. Testini
G. Testini
FLF. De Luca
F. De Luca
MHM. Hu
M. Hu
Shokoofeh ShamsiShokoofeh Shamsi
Shokoofeh Shamsi
RGRobin Gasser
Robin Gasser

6 October 2020 in Parasitology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAmene Raouf Rahmati
Amene Raouf Rahmati
BKBehzad Kiani
Behzad Kiani
AAAsma Afshari
Asma Afshari
EMElham Moghaddas
Elham Moghaddas
MWMichelle Williams
Michelle Williams
Shokoofeh ShamsiShokoofeh Shamsi
Shokoofeh Shamsi

1 June 2016 in International Journal of Food Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Shokoofeh ShamsiShokoofeh Shamsi
Shokoofeh Shamsi
JSJaydipbhai Suthar
Jaydipbhai Suthar

26 May 2023 in Parasitology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shokoofeh ShamsiShokoofeh Shamsi
Shokoofeh Shamsi
DBDiane P. Barton
Diane P. Barton
A review was conducted to identify the most common causative agents of anisakidosis, the methods used for identification of the causative agents, and to summarize the sources of infection, and patients’ demographics. A total of 762 cases (409 articles, inclusive of all languages) were found between 1965 and 2022. The age range was 7 months to 85 years old. Out of the 34 countries, Japan, Spain, and South Korea stood out with the highest number of published human cases of anisakidosis, respectively. This raises the question: Why are there few to no reports of anisakidosis cases in other countries, such as Indonesia and Vietnam, where seafood consumption is notably high? Other than the gastrointestinal tract, parasites were frequently found in internal organs such as liver, spleen, pancreas, lung, hiatal and epigastric hernia, and tonsils. There are also reports of the worm being excreted through the nose, rectum, and mouth. Symptoms included sore throat, tumor, bleeding, gastric/epigastric/abdominal/substernal/lower back/testicular pain, nausea, anorexia, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, intestinal obstruction, intussusception, blood in feces, hematochezia, anemia, and respiratory arrest. These appeared either immediately or up to 2 months after consuming raw/undercooked seafood and lasting up to 10 years. Anisakidosis commonly mimicked symptoms of cancer, pancreatitis, type I/II Kounis syndrome, intussusception, Crohn’s disease, ovarian cysts, intestinal endometriosis, epigastralgia, gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hernia, intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, and appendicitis. In these cases, it was only after surgery that it was found these symptoms/conditions were caused by anisakids. A range of not only mainly marine but also freshwater fish/shellfish were reported as source of infection. There were several reports of infection with >1 nematode (up to >200), more than one species of anisakids in the same patient, and the presence of L4/adult nematodes. The severity of symptoms did not relate to the number of parasites. The number of anisakidosis cases is grossly underestimated globally. Using erroneous taxonomic terms, assumptions, and identifying the parasite as Anisakis (based solely on the Y-shaped lateral cord in crossed section of the parasite) are still common. The Y-shaped lateral cord is not unique to Anisakis spp. Acquiring a history of ingesting raw/undercooked fish/seafood can be a clue to the diagnosis of the condition. This review emphasizes the following key points: insufficient awareness of fish parasites among medical professionals, seafood handlers, and policy makers; limited availability of effective diagnostic methodologies; and inadequate clinical information for optimizing the management of anisakidosis in numerous regions worldwide.